South China Sea Forum

[cochine]

Sewage treatment on Yongxing island:

whats hoa-indonesian? whats that? Natuna is in the West China Sea

where is west china sea ?

There is Natuna Sea where:

Indonesia-China Tensions in the Natuna Sea: Evidence of Naval Efficacy Over Coast Guards?

http://thediplomat.com/2016/06/indo...evidence-of-naval-efficacy-over-coast-guards/

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

where is west china sea ?

There is Natuna Sea where:

Indonesia-China Tensions in the Natuna Sea: Evidence of Naval Efficacy Over Coast Guards?

http://thediplomat.com/2016/06/indo...evidence-of-naval-efficacy-over-coast-guards/

West China sea is also what the Vietnamese would call the West Vietnamese Sea

 

[cochine]

West China sea is also what the Vietnamese would call the West Vietnamese Sea

west china sea doesn't exist, you are yoker.

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

west china sea doesn't exist, you are yoker.

if West China sea does not exist, then the East Vietnam Sea doesnt too.

Hence, u're a joker yourself.

 

[cochine]

if West China sea does not exist, then the East Vietnam Sea doesnt too.

Hence, u're a joker yourself.

Vietnam's East Sea is existed along with the history of Vietnam.

East Sea stated in Cửu Đỉnh nhà Nguyễn ( 阮朝九鼎)

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

Vietnam's East Sea is existed along with the history of Vietnam.

East Sea stated in Cửu Đỉnh nhà Nguyễn ( 阮朝九鼎)

View attachment 337847

i can only recognise the CHINESE words 'East Sea'- from where does it states 'East Vietnam Sea'?

 

[cochine]

i can only recognise the CHINESE words 'East Sea'- from where does it states 'East Vietnam Sea'?

the "East Sea" is in easterner sea territory a of Vietnam.

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

the "East Sea" is in easterner sea territory a of Vietnam.

From where does it state 'East Vietnam Sea'. posting a picture of a cauldron with the word 'East Sea' on it doesnt prove anything- that could even be a Chinese artifact(in fact, i think it is).

In fact the 'East Sea' on that cauldron is refering to the East Sea here above

 

[cochine]

From where does it state 'East Vietnam Sea'. posting a picture of a cauldron with the word 'East Sea' on it doesnt prove anything- that could even be a Chinese artifact(in fact, i think it is).

You can see it when visit Nguyen Dynasty Citadel in Hue city, in Vietnam. It is Vietnam National history heritage.

 

[CAPRICORN-88]

You can see it when visit Nguyen Dynasty Citadel in Hue city, in Vietnam. It is Vietnam National history heritage.

Don't distort Chinese history. ANNAM as it was called then was a quasi-state and like the Southern Han Kingdom in Quangzhou served at the pleasure the Middle Kingdom's Emperor. Look at the Palace and all the writing in the walls, they are Chinese as Nguyen were all Chinese. Whenever there was a change in dynasty, these quasi-state maystill be loyal to the former Emperor and that was until the newly installed Emperor right it by sending his troops to crush the rebels.

On the other hand, the Kampa Kingdom was annihilated and annexed by ANNAMESE King and hence we have Khmer Annamese in the South who still viewed Imperial China and her King in Hue as occupier.

Russia eyes military deal, transfer of technology to Philippines

September 25, 2016 Joel Dizon Nation 0

Transfer of technology!!! Where did I heard that term so very often?

India of course!!!

Imagine India who does not even have the technology to build a supersonic windtunnel now wanted to built a hypersonic Mach 7 Brahmos for Russia. The missile will disintegrate in mid-flight.

Now Indian fanboy claimed that France will also transfer their technology to India as well just because India finally signed up for 36 Rafales after luring the French with an initial order for 126.

I take such news with a pinch of salt because I know one thing most of you do not. NO Advanced especially Western powers will ever transfer you their technology.

 

[GS Zhou]

VNA editor staff did same what The Phil star did to prevent misunderstanding when West Philippine sea is new name called by Philippine authourities. Its permitted.

Do you know what Senator Antonio Trillanes IV said to media ?

"“This issue of China’s reclamation and dredging activities has grave national and regional security implications. It is high time that we assess our country’s preparedness for any contingency,” said Trillanes, chairman of the Senate committee on national defense and security, in a statement on Tuesday...

and "“may have significantly changed the physical features of these disputed areas, which in turn, could bring larger geopolitical consequences such as providing a stronger basis for China’s territorial claim, thereby diminishing the Philippines’ assertion of sovereignty.”

Read more: http://globalnation.inquirer.net/12...-reclamation-in-disputed-waters#ixzz4LF0OXssx



He didn't mentioned the word "West Philippine sea" or "South China Sea' in his statement. Editor staff of Philippine Star and VNA does their job fairly.

I don't care what the PH officer is talking about. That is not the core of our debate.

The core of our discussion is, when some media (Media A) is quoting the article from another media (Media B), Media A needs to make clear indication about which part of the article is coming from the original author (Media B), which part is coming from the editor of Media A.

Like in the case about your VN media post the article from the Reuters, the mark "Editor's note" is required when you want to say "...... the South China Sea (Editor's note: xxx Sea)", because the original Reuters article has NO intension to call South China Sea with another name, so you need to tell your readers the name "xxx Sea" is actually coming from your own editors, not coming from Reuters.

I believe I've been clear enough in this case. I'll stop the education. As I said already, such silly tricks you and your media is playing with could only humiliate your own country.

 

[yusheng]

Chinese defence facilities are installing

 

[yusheng]

September 19 to 21, the PLAN South China Sea Fleet landing ship drilled known as the "new hovercraft bison" landing craft for combat based courses assessment

 

[cochine]

I don't care what the PH officer is talking about. That is not the core of our debate.

The core of our discussion is, when some media (Media A) is quoting the article from another media (Media B), Media A needs to make clear indication about which part of the article is coming from the original author (Media B), which part is coming from the editor of Media A.

Like in the case about your VN media post the article from the Reuters, the mark "Editor's note" is required when you want to say "...... the South China Sea (Editor's note: xxx Sea)", because the original Reuters article has NO intension to call South China Sea with another name, so you need to tell your readers the name "xxx Sea" is actually coming from your own editors, not coming from Reuters.

I believe I've been clear enough in this case. I'll stop the education. As I said already, such silly tricks you and your media is playing with could only humiliate your own country.

dont forget that some chinese member on this forum said that " south china sea " does mean that there is south sea of China.

To prevent that in future china could say that VNA has said "south china sea" in his report, so Vietnam VNA has accepted there is sea belong to China.

In fact South China Sea or India Ocean is called by westerner for navigation only.

We do know well about mentality of Chinese. so why VNA is very carefully handling with this matter.

 

[grey boy 2]

1000 tons class "Seawater Desalination facility" started to operate in (永兴岛)Yongxing Island
三沙永兴千吨海水淡化厂10月1日投入使用。南海网记者高鹏摄