What's new

South China Sea Arbitration News & Discussion

no no no I admit both countries have their own right of claiming because of the mess in SCS historically that's why we should negotiate,but clearly now it is a power play,besides why do you think taiwan government claims exactly the same as CCP? are they both wrong?

Taiwan has mixed people. There can be both. One can agree. When you're talking about power. US has much more power to offer than China. Your government really underestimate the USA.
 
.
What a victorious moment indeed for our country but we cannot celebrate just yet.

This is just the easy part I believe. The most difficult part would be on how to enforce it. The pressure is on China though as the international community will be watching closely on this great development in our country's favor.

PH-CHINA-Territorial-Row-infograhics_CNNPH%20(2).png
 
. . .
He forgot to tell you that due to Vietnam war that is why he is living in Canada.

:D
A son of a displaced refugee

Better than China. You're still living in that third world country? hahaha
 
.
LOL says an Indian, who is actually not even recognized by India as its citizen. SO how easy it is for to apply for Indian visa ?
that just explains how immature you are...first of all i don't have to apply for a visa to visit my won country...(may be different in your country)...secondly for fellow NRI's it has never been so easy....apply for OIC and you are good for life :cheers:
 
.
Taiwan has mixed people. There can be both. One can agree. When you're talking about power. US has much more power to offer than China. Your government really underestimate the USA.
We don't underestimate anyone, we are more than anyone to know that US is MUCH MUCH MORE powerful than us, but it doesn't means we will yield, just like Veitnam and philipine won't yeild to china. You can watch the taiwanese channel to see if they are willing to give up the lecacy of our common ancestors, yeah, you can easily convince yourself that we are brainwashed zobie under CCP government, but when the so called "democratic" chinese oppose you, pls think why.
 
.
If you stood in front of me and say shit like that, the only think you will see is a knife to your skull.

Huh, buddy?
I'm quite volatile IRL too but saying things like that is not quite recommended ...
and it is against the rules of PDF even in the conditional form. Please desist.

Good day, Tay.
 
.
This has damaged the reputation of the Permanent Court of Arbitration. Is this surprising? Probably not given the influence of the West on the Permanent Court of Arbitration. However, the rest of the world will see the Permanent Court of Arbitration as political and will set up its own court of arbitration that is apolitical.
This is what essentially happened...

China: The entirety of the SCS is ours.

Asia: No, it is not.

China: Yes it is.

Asia then petitioned for the opinions of outsiders. It does not matter if China was a participant of that petition. What the rest of Asia want was the opinion of other people. It does not matter if the UN can enforce its decision or not. Everybody know the UN cannot. The point here is that Asia want China to know that China is basically alone. No thief can point to other thieves to justify his own actions.

There is no 'damage' other than to China's image.
 
. .
^^^ vtnsx post # 451

Lots of you up there when I said nothing bad about Vietnam, myself.
The rules still exist however. Keep them on your part and report wrongdoing?

Getting banned gives the upper hand to your adversary, you know?
Be them trolls or saints!

Good luck, Tay.
 
. .
Or you can just leave and its Philippines with an S
sorry man but I think that is our right to reclaim the islands and we are not willing to relinquish and I believe you have the same thought too, so that's why CHina and Phlippines government should talk, if both side decide to "enforce" sth then it will end up badly, we have differences, we should hold bilateral negotiation, you see even the taiwan government can't accept this clearly unfair tribunal manipulated by the US, so you can expect why we react like this.
 
. .
:lol:

I like the US spin here except that US never signed something like that. China on the other hand is a signatory to a multilateral pact. Going back on the words when push comes to shove means open violation and a huge egg on china's face :lol:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom