What's new

Soon Nepal will come under the care of China!

Theory of Dravidian justification of cruel actions.

No it was not Dravidian superiority it was the case of basic human rights being violated on Tamils by Sinhalese forces....

I am quoting one point which was the turning point in SL history not India or any other foreign country.....

"In 1956 Prime Minister S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike passed the "Sinhala Only Act", an Act which replaced English with Sinhala as the only official language of the country. This was seen as a deliberate attempt to discourage the Sri Lankan Tamils from working in the Ceylon Civil Service and other public services. The Tamil speaking minorities of the Ceylon (Sri Lankan Tamils, Indian Tamils and Sri Lankan Moors) viewed the Act as linguistic, cultural and economic discrimination against them. Many Tamil speaking civil servants/public servants were forced to resign because they weren't fluent in Sinhala. This was a prelude to the 1956 Gal Oya riots and the 1958 widespread riots in which thousands of Tamil civilians perished. The civil war was a direct result of the escalation of the confrontational politics that followed."
 
India is using the so called Indian origin Madhesi's in Nepal to intervene of it's sovereignty and internal affairs.. As it has done in the past with other neighboring sovereign nations.. Comprende ?

India is using the so called Indian origin people to intervene in the National politics in US, Canada, UK etc- which every country does- just few days ago- UK PM said It won't be long before there would be Indian origin PM in UK and there is nothing wrong in that- even you as a Srilankan would want Australian citizenship and vote there- doesn't mean Australia should throw you out-
 
Do you have some problem in mind ? I asked you what is strategic imp, plz explane. now you are replying " The exact strategic importance that india enjoy for years and years..." . Again what The exact strategic importance that india enjoy for years and years ? plz explain.
Thats a problem if u dont know what exactly india was enjoying.. i rather stay quite cuz it hutrs u anyways...
But u are always to google it.. if its continuesly bothering u.
 
Thats a problem if u dont know what exactly india was enjoying.. i rather stay quite cuz it hutrs u anyways...
But u are always to google it.. if its continuesly bothering u.
yes you rather stay quite, otherwise got stick on you a$$.
 
Like defending from Gurkhas?
Defending from RAW agents who are all over nepal dominating in nepal's politics.
Arresting anyone u want from nepal it wont happen if china dominating.. Nepal will be free from it.. and no one will ever kill anyone like how RAW help to kill royal family..

yes you rather stay quite, otherwise got stick on you a$$.
I would say exactily say the same thing but hey i rather stay straight then look gay as u sound like.
 
Defending from RAW agents who are all over nepal dominating in nepal's politics.
Arresting anyone u want from nepal it wont happen if china dominating.. Nepal will be free from it.. and no one will ever kill anyone like how RAW help to kill royal family..
R&AW killed a family that was pro India? Seriously?

And these are scholars in geopolitics. :rofl:
 

That was uncalled for- please delete your post-

You should understand his problem think of yourself in his shoes before making such comments-
 
Last edited:
If u still unable to grasp some realities then no one can help u.

I'm afraid it's you're who is in denial of realities

So you mean you are saving your a$$ getting fuuked by china ?? Dont worry your destiny is getting fuuking either By US or India or China or by everyone all together. By the way what is your job in .Au ? something similar. Oh I forget who will put his DDD in a bluudy dirty black A$$ hole

Listen you illiterate little shyt .. First of all try and convey what ever babble you're trying to convey to readable English.. This is not the public sewer in the slum you call home.. This is a international forum

India was never No-2 in any association- even when It got its independence and was weak- It didn't associate with world powers It didn't have to- It had 2million troops who had won the WW2 for allies-

When the chance came It went inside East Pakistan in opposition to US and China- 1.3 billion make b!tches- not otherwise-

So comparing India and Srilanka is ridiculous-

Never compared the two.. Just reminded you of realities, Sovereignty cannot be measured by the size of the population or geographical size

India has always been and will be a subordinate state for the foreseeable future.. It's an artificial nation created by the colonists.. India never had 2 million troops that won the WWII it was 2 million British subjects of British India that participated under the Union Jack that fought for HM the Queen


Again in real politik India was and will be a subordinate country for the global powers.. During the cold war to Russia in an failed attempt by Nehru and Indira Gandhi to distance it self from it's colonial legacy and now to the West specifically to the US to be used asa regional counter weight to China, It's true competitor
 
Last edited:
I'm afraid it's you're who is in denial of realities



Listen you illiterate little shyt .. First of all try and convey what ever babble you're trying to convey to readable English.. This is not the public sewer in the slum you call home.. This is a international forum



Never compared the two.. Just reminded you of realities

India has always been and will be a subordinate state for the foreseeable future.. It's an artificial nation created by the colonists.. India never had 2 million troops that won the WWII it was 2 million British subjects of British India that participated under the Union Jack that fought for HM the Queen

Sovereignty cannot be measured by the size of the population or geographical size

Again in real politik India was and will be a subordinate country for the global powers.. During the cold war to Russia in an failed attempt to distance it self from it's colonial legacy and now to the West specifically to the US to be used as a regional counter weight to China, It's true competitor
I afraid you are the one who never traveled to Nepal, or not even talked to any Nepali.
 
I afraid you are the one who never traveled to Nepal, or not even talked to any Nepali.

I'm afraid you have no right to talk for me.. You know nothing about me.. You're just another faceless entity in a online forum

I have traveled to Nepal and to India a multitude of times.. Still have exchanges with few Nepali friends and colleagues i keep in touch with.. And it's not a pretty picture they're opinion about Indian role in the recent developments

So I guess it's you who need a dose of reality and try get get some real information from the people other than gutter journalism that is called India media these days
 
I'm afraid you have no right to talk for me.. I have traveled to Nepal and to India a multitude of times.. Still have exchanges with few Nepali friends and colleagues i keep in touch with.. And it's not a pretty picture they're opinion about Indian role in the recent developments

So I guess it's you who need a dose of reality and try get get some real information from the people other than gutter journalism that is called India media these days

No right?, Please god give me mercy, how I dared to talk with such angel. :rofl:

Diagnosis Another case of Indophobia.
 
India has always been and will be a subordinate state for the foreseeable future.. It's an artificial nation created by the colonists.. India never had 2 million troops that won the WWII it was 2 million British subjects of British India that participated under the Union Jack that fought for HM the Queen

Sovereignty cannot be measured by the size of the population or geographical size

Again in real politik India was and will be a subordinate country for the global powers.. During the cold war to Russia in an failed attempt to distance it self from it's colonial legacy and now to the West specifically to the US to be used as a regional counter weight to China, It's true competitor

1. Every Country is an artificial construct so your point about India being an artificial nation is irrelevant at best and disingenuous otherwise.

2. India has no need to be a subordinate power - we have our own agenda which we pursue, it is again irrelevant whether west sees us a counter weight to China or not - India has an independent foreign policy and at the moment it is in alignment as that of West in Asia - Pacific while being out of sync with that of West in many other matters like Climate Change, Tariff Barriers, Market Access, Subsidies, IPR etc. If one cares to take a comprehensive view of India Foreign Policy one would be surprised to note that India and China are collaborating on great many fronts against West on the substantial matters which would decide the future - they are not just glamorous enough to be commented on in popular media.

3. Indian sovereignty is sacrosanct and inviolate - West and China lobby in India to promote their interest and so does India in West to influence policy making favorable to India but ultimately onus lies solely with India. If one carries any misconceptions on this matter then it is their folly.

Regards
 
No right?, Please god give me mercy, how I dared to talk with such angel. :rofl:

Diagnosis Another case of Indophobia.

Yeah the usual last mundane line when run out of counter argument.. Happens here quite often.. You're not an exception.. Then again as one of the few sensible mature Indian posters here mentioned quite often.. Majority of you'll are ignorant collage kids with the first taste of internet nationalism
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom