HAIDER
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 21, 2006
- Messages
- 33,771
- Reaction score
- 14
- Country
- Location
wellllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ... I respect his personal opinion...... if majority choose this....respect them..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
wellllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ... I respect his personal opinion...... if majority choose this....respect them..
wellllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ... I respect his personal opinion...... if majority choose this....respect them..
Impact of such action could be felt by Indian workers in Muslim countries.... Modi is not fool.SC has already put a law in place.
No amplified Azaan from 10 PM to 6 AM.
It is the duty of the present government to enforce it.
Why the Modi government is silent on this?
Votes?
Its about 3 years of his inaction ...And counting..
I feel sorry for you if you expected anything better here mate.
Law should be enforced...if no petition under SC consideration...There is a SC verdict on this already.
Law should be enforced...if no petition under SC consideration...
Indeed. If you try to discuss with him on a topic "how gravity works", he will even bring Modi's name somewhere from the space in that discussion.
Maybe you need to revisit some of them again. You will find a whole lot of things changed there.
To each his own then. I cannot argue about your personal preferences mate but let's just say that I do not agree on many points you've made above.@The Eagle
Do you see my point here?
I have.
And nothing I've seen has made me change my mind.
Allow me to spell it out for you, embarrassing as it might be with Pakistanis looking on.
We are a boorish people burdened by massive insecurities abiut a number of things. Both in relation to Muslims and Pakistanis regionally, and the world in general globally.
Pakistanis do not hold a candle to us when it comes to abusive bigotry, low IQ lack of class, and general prickly boorishness and lack of tolerance and fair play.
In such a scenario better the tolerable enemy than the bilious compatriots.
To each his own then. I cannot argue about your personal preferences mate but let's just say that I do not agree on many points you've made above.
Do you see my point here?