What's new

Son Of Arjun Frightens Indians

Nahraf

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
1,508
Reaction score
0
Armor: Son Of Arjun Frightens Indians

Son Of Arjun Frightens Indians

August 20, 2010: India has begun working on its next generation battle tank. Called the FMBT (Future Main Battle Tank), this vehicle aims to build on the success of the last Indian designed tank, the Arjun. This worries many Indian taxpayers, and soldiers. That's because the government recently ordered another 124 Arjuns. That came about because recent competitive tests between the Indian designed Arjun and Russian T-90 tank resulted in an unexpected victory by the Arjun. The Indian Army was compelled (by pro-Arjun politicians) to conduct a field test between the domestically designed (and largely rejected) Arjun tank, and the Russian T-90 (now considered the army's primary tank). Fourteen of each tank were used, and the results were classified. But journalists had no trouble getting unofficial reports that the Arjun managed to best the T-90 in tests of mobility, endurance and gunnery.

This was unusual because, until now, the Arjun was considered an expensive and embarrassing failure. Development of the Arjun began in the 1980s, and until four years ago, the army had received only five of them, for evaluation purposes. The evaluation did not go well. Originally, the Arjun was to have replaced thousands of Russian tanks, but after so many delays, the army only reluctantly accepted 128 Arjuns (equipping the 140th Armored Brigade). The new test reports resulted in renewed pressure on the army to buy more Arjuns. This pitted the Defense Ministry weapons development and procurement bureaucrats against the generals. The bureaucrats won this one. But the battle continues. That's because the recent tests assume that the Arjun has really fixed all the problems it was having with its electronics. In this case, it was the fire control system. But Arjun has also had problems with its engine, and that fact that its size and weight prevents it from being used with current tank transporters. Thus the FMBT is to be lighter (50 tons) and based on what works in the Arjun and other modern tanks. The FMBT is expected to replace older Russian tanks.

Meanwhile, last year, an Indian factory delivered the first ten (of a thousand) T-90 tanks to the Indian Army. The Russian designed armored vehicles are being built in India under license. Many of the components are Indian made, and some of the electronics are imported from Western suppliers. The Indian-made T-90s cost about $3 million each. India has already bought 700 Russian made T-90 tanks, at a cost of $3.5 million each. The FMBT is expected to cost over $5 million each. The high price is due to a lot of high tech. This includes an active defense system to defeat anti-tank missiles, a much more powerful engine, lots of electronics and a hermetically sealed crew department to provide protection against chemical weapons and radiation. All this stuff is tricky to develop, just the sort of thing DRDO excels as screwing up. This is mostly the fault of the DRDO bureaucrats, who are not very good at using all the technical and manufacturing talent India has.

Four years ago, India adopted the Russian T-90 as its new main battle tank. By 2020, India will have 2,000 upgraded T-72s, over 1,500 T-90s, and few hundred other tanks (including a few Arjuns). This will be the most powerful armored force in Eurasia, unless China moves ahead with upgrades to its tank force. The border between China and India is high in the Himalayan mountains, which is not good tank country. India's tank force is mainly for use against Pakistan.

The T-90 is a highly evolved T-72. Originally, the T-90 was done as a fall-back design. The T-80 was supposed to be the successor to the T-72. But like the T-62 and T-64 before it, the T-80 didn't quite work out as planned. So the T-72, with a much improved turret and all manner of gadgets, was trotted out as the T-90. Weighting 47 tons, it's 23 feet long, 11 feet wide and 7.5 feet high. Same package, better contents. And with well trained crews, it can be deadly. The Arjun is a larger vehicle (59 tons, 34.9 feet long and 12.7 feet wide).

The FMBT will probably be more similar in size to the T-90. Indian armor experts, both military and civilian, are hoping the FMBT is based more on the T-90 than the Arjun. But the most worrisome aspect of the FMBT project is DRDO (Defense R&D Organization), which also developed Arjun. It's feared that the DRDO wonks have not learned from the many errors made with the Arjun. Journalists are digging to find out how legitimate the field tests between the T-90 and Arjun were. It's feared the competition was fixed, something that is not unknown in Indian defense matters. While military procurement is political in all countries, India has had more than its share of problems here. The hope is that the FMBT will not be another DRDO disaster.
 
.
Not surprising this article is from stratergypage :D

But i wonder where do they get these weasel statements from?

The Indian Army was compelled (by pro-Arjun politicians)
 
.
Not much discussion on this topic from 2 days shows the quality (worst) of this article…and that we Indian members here have learned to ignore Bull**** :azn:
 
.
I just want to know why the Indian army would be against having a domestic tank. It should be the other way around. Even if it has a few problems they can be learned away with time. It is just a better option hands down to go with home grown armor. I still think not all the facts are on the table about the Arjun. What we know are so called leaked documents by the media and a half hearted and long delayed nod to 124 tanks. It would be good to have a official army response to the tank (I am not very well informed on this project).
 
.
Domestic tank means no bribe, simple as that.
 
.
I just want to know why the Indian army would be against having a domestic tank. It should be the other way around. Even if it has a few problems they can be learned away with time. It is just a better option hands down to go with home grown armor. I still think not all the facts are on the table about the Arjun. What we know are so called leaked documents by the media and a half hearted and long delayed nod to 124 tanks. It would be good to have a official army response to the tank (I am not very well informed on this project).

Whatever gave you the idea that the IA is against an indigenous tank? The IA waited for nearly 30 years for the indigenous tank to be made available. When it came, it was loaded with problems which had to be resolved. You guys in the meanwhile went and got the T-80 UDs. There was no option really but to go for the T-90s. Budgetary constraints forced us to get the watered down versions of the T -90s with the understanding that subsequent incremental improvements be carried out as and when the finances permitted which is what is being done now. The Arjun, now has had all the kinks worked out of its system and is a worthwhile tank, however its weight limits its operation to certain terrain types only. The FMBT will have many of the new technologies developed during the evolution of the Arjun and certain improvements on them. Arjun is a tank to reckon with and the FMBT shall be better.
 
.
Domestic tank means no bribe, simple as that.

that is pure cr@p and you know that, lets us not have the typical DRDO - save our jobs nonsense here. do we really enjoy the luxury of opting for a sub standard and glitch ridden product in the subcontinent? What was Arjun 5 years ago?
 
. .
The article praises Arjun and sees faults in drdo production line so whats the fuzz ......we should be thanking the author
 
. . . .
Not surprising this article is from stratergypage. But i wonder where do they get these weasel statements from?

You should read te weasel statement they use about Pakistan and China. I always thought that many contributors to this website are Indians.
 
.
Whatever gave you the idea that the IA is against an indigenous tank? The IA waited for nearly 30 years for the indigenous tank to be made available. When it came, it was loaded with problems which had to be resolved. You guys in the meanwhile went and got the T-80 UDs. There was no option really but to go for the T-90s. Budgetary constraints forced us to get the watered down versions of the T -90s with the understanding that subsequent incremental improvements be carried out as and when the finances permitted which is what is being done now. The Arjun, now has had all the kinks worked out of its system and is a worthwhile tank, however its weight limits its operation to certain terrain types only. The FMBT will have many of the new technologies developed during the evolution of the Arjun and certain improvements on them. Arjun is a tank to reckon with and the FMBT shall be better.

The idea came when I could not find any official response from the Army about their decision to buy 124 tanks. I totally agree with the rest of your analysis. The article says exactly what you list in a biased way. The important point was that Arjun was earmarked to be the MBT. Now it is not. And the decision to get 124 tanks was made after a lot of "no's" by the army. So I would say who would you think is at fault here. The Army not giving the obviously better Arjun a chance or The DRDO who did not perform for the Army?
 
.
The idea came when I could not find any official response from the Army about their decision to buy 124 tanks. I totally agree with the rest of your analysis. The article says exactly what you list in a biased way. The important point was that Arjun was earmarked to be the MBT. Now it is not. And the decision to get 124 tanks was made after a lot of "no's" by the army. So I would say who would you think is at fault here. The Army not giving the obviously better Arjun a chance or The DRDO who did not perform for the Army?

See, the excellent performance of the Arjun is a recent phenomenon. By that time the IA had already got the T-90s in the required numbers with more in the production line. I mean how long could they wait? The Arjun when it did come, was heavier than planned. At 60 tons, the existing tank transporters could not carry them. They could also not use most of the bridges in the forward areas as only highways have a road classification of 60. This called for a complete overhaul of the entire logistic system including the railway flatcars. The sheer weight of the Arjun made it unfit for use in most of the terrain types available and therefore unfit for use as MBT. It was because of this reason that the IA is not overly keen on inducting these in large numbers. the cost of upgrading the logistics chain to be able to support the Arjun is staggering. Ultimately, a compromise was reached and 124 tanks ordered just to ensure economic viability of the Arjun production line. The IA is very clear, it will be the FMBT which will populate the next generation of armoured formations in India. The so-called son of Arjun. We wanted the Arjun but that was not to be.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom