What's new

Some snaps of OplotM & VT4 testing in Pakistan

Kid,

the old school stabilization is just one of the many things that are still being used in Chinese mbts. Need i remind you that your folks have still not mastered the thermal image technology? The best they have in VT-4 is still uncooled, and touches 8-12M at best, which barely makes it second generation.

Uncooled thermal imagers will not last a day in Tamewala, Cholistan region. Thats what happened to the first trial as well.


I can take you to kindergarten when it comes to tanks and armor. I am opening another thread and inviting you to come and discuss things there. Lets see if your patriorism helps you there or not.
Now comes to name calling? You simply failed to demonstrate any of your nonsense pointed towards VT-4. Your knowledge of VT-4 is primitive and all what you mention is other than your opinion. Seeing how you try to avoid any of my points without any concrete proof or backing more or less demonstrate your rubbish opinion. Keep the headburt. It does not change the fact of VT-4 superiority.
 
.
I advise you dont talk nonsense when you know nothing about VT-4. More or less demonstrate of your limited understanding of VT-4 when you claim VT-4 is inferior. Typical western mindset that knowing little equivalent to inferior.


Even a so called modern Leopard 2 tank steering is so primitive compare to VT-4. Not to mention other inferior tanks. Digital automatic transmission eliminate the previous difficult handling and steering a tank and make anybody who knows how to drive an automatic car, knows how to drive VT-4. This is not possible for Leopard, Abram M1A2, Al Khalid and Oplot-M.

Oplot-P with Atlay subsystem will be on par or better then Type-99 so how VT-4 is comparable to it??

China now is not capable to built systems on par with west so kindly stop spreading lies here.
 
.
Now comes to name calling? You simply failed to demonstrate any of your nonsense pointed towards VT-4. Your knowledge of VT-4 is primitive and all what you mention is other than your opinion. Seeing how you try to avoid any of my points without any concrete proof or backing more or less demonstrate your rubbish opinion. Keep the headburt. It does not change the fact of VT-4 superiority.

Unless your name is "Kid", you shouldnt be offended.


VT-4 is anything but superior, though it is a decent system with usual hiccups.

VT-4 using uncooled optics is a FACT

VT-4 using a copy of t-72s 2E28 liac stabilization system is also a fact

VT-4 using t-72 style AZ type autoloader is a fact too

Need i continue more?
 
.
VT-4 I think in the end will win as it will offer more TOT as well as better discounts by Chinese
 
.
Oplot-P with Atlay subsystem will be on par or better then Type-99 so how VT-4 is comparable to it??

China now is not capable to built systems on par with west so kindly stop spreading lies here.

Yes yes, it is fits your fantasy. Go ahead and live in your denial. The mighty of western europe has yet to build a true 5th gen fighter jet with stealth shaping and workable internal weapon bay. Chinese Destroyer 055 with the latest S-band AESA that eliminates dedicated fire control and have an integrated mass. This is something US even yet to deploy on their destroyer. The VLS is the world first hot and cold launch combo VLS system unrival in the world. The electric magnetic propulsion system already install in Type 096 SSN which western has only so far started on drawing board only.

Your hated for China and biased towards western are well known. There is no much truth on your comment.



Unless your name is "Kid", you shouldnt be offended.


VT-4 is anything but superior, though it is a decent system with usual hiccups.

VT-4 using uncooled optics is a FACT

VT-4 using a copy of t-72s 2E28 liac stabilization system is also a fact

VT-4 using t-72 style AZ type autoloader is a fact too

Need i continue more?
You have yet to prove what you say with facts. Just becos you say so and its is? At least I provide video and proof of its stabilizing and high advance automatic transmission steering of VT-4 tank. You? Just your big mouth. :enjoy:
 
. .
Yes yes, it is fits your fantasy. Go ahead and live in your denial. The mighty of western europe has yet to build a true 5th gen fighter jet with stealth shaping and workable internal weapon bay. Chinese Destroyer 055 with the latest S-band AESA that eliminates dedicated fire control and have an integrated mass. This is something US even yet to deploy on their destroyer. The VLS is the world first hot and cold launch combo VLS system unrival in the world. The electric magnetic propulsion system already install in Type 096 SSN which western has only so far started on drawing board only.

Your hated for China and biased towards western are well known. There is no much truth on your comment.





Being a pragmatic person doesnt let me hate any country or personality. Think whatever you like to think.

You have yet to prove what you say with facts. Just becos you say so and its is? At least I provide video and proof of its stabilizing and high advance automatic transmission steering of VT-4 tank. You? Just your big mouth. :enjoy:

t-72 style autoloader is still there..

VT4-%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%9A-Gunner-Station-4-1024x576.jpg
 
.
@Dazzler T-84 has a future according to my calculation citing our past ties with Kharkiv Morozov Machine Building Design Burea regarding supply of 6TD-2 Engines and i heared they are going to supply 1500hp, new engine for AK-2.
 
. .
@Dazzler T-84 has a future according to my calculation citing our past ties with Kharkiv Morozov Machine Building Design Burea regarding supply of 6TD-2 Engines and i heared they are going to supply 1500hp, new engine for AK-2.

The problem is ToT, while Chinese are quite happy to share with us the technology as they did in case of Alkhalid, Ukrainians are not at ease with this. Still, PA has asked them for a serious bargain this time around. They know PA does not mess around. They just handed over the engines for AK-1 almost 15 days prior to the contract deadline which is a sign that they are damn serious to fulfill the contract.

Lets see how things turn up.
 
.
t-72 style autoloader is still there..

VT4-%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%9A-Gunner-Station-4-1024x576.jpg
Once again shown your desperation. From this photo and you can concluded its a T-72 auto loader? You simply just try any means to prove your fantasy point without any concrete backing?

Let me once again shown you the so called better stabilizing from Chinese tank. 5 score out of 5 hits and the tank never even needs to slow down to aim and shot becos the FCS and stabilizing are so superior.
Remember, this Chinese version is just a mediocre Type 96 tank , its not even Type 96B . Not to mention comparable to VT-4. Yet is superior on the move shooting trump anything Russian can throw at. You can claim its only T-72 but so as the Chinese with a mediocre Type 96 tank. This is not Type 99. You can imagine, we Chinese got even better stuff behind us.

 
.
Yes yes, it is fits your fantasy. Go ahead and live in your denial. The mighty of western europe has yet to build a true 5th gen fighter jet with stealth shaping and workable internal weapon bay. Chinese Destroyer 055 with the latest S-band AESA that eliminates dedicated fire control and have an integrated mass. This is something US even yet to deploy on their destroyer. The VLS is the world first hot and cold launch combo VLS system unrival in the world. The electric magnetic propulsion system already install in Type 096 SSN which western has only so far started on drawing board only.

Your hated for China and biased towards western are well known. There is no much truth on your comment.




You have yet to prove what you say with facts. Just becos you say so and its is? At least I provide video and proof of its stabilizing and high advance automatic transmission steering of VT-4 tank. You? Just your big mouth. :enjoy:

China can't make a Type-26 quality hull even now, that is reality, just making large ship hulls don't make them modern and advance, Oplot-P is in class of Type-99 and VT-4 is just upgrade over MBT-2000 which was low quality export version which Oplot is certainly not, with High end Western systems it will be more capable then any Chinese Tank currently in service.

Good thing is that people who are in control in China are very sensible people and they don't boost things like you, they tell truth about their stuff to Pakistan and we both work to make it better when it comes to Pakistan oriented products.
 
.
China can't make a Type-26 quality hull even now, that is reality, just making large ship hulls don't make them modern and advance, Oplot-P is in class of Type-99 and VT-4 is just upgrade over MBT-2000 which was low quality export version which Oplot is certainly not, with High end Western systems it will be more capable then any Chinese Tank currently in service.

Good thing is that people who are in control in China are very sensible people and they don't boost things like you, they tell truth about their stuff to Pakistan and we both work to make it better when it comes to Pakistan oriented products.
Sorry, for you low quality post. I dont know where did you get the idea China cant even build a hull quality better than Type 26 hull. Maybe in your dream but not reality. Clearly your poor update of latest Chinese military technology is hampering your judgement. I forgive you . :enjoy:
 
.
There is only one solution for PA , design its own tank according to its regional requirement. Unfortunately , all tank manufacturer live in cold zone and there machine according to there regional requirements.
We have dried mountain to muddy marshy plains. Specification from from Afghan border to Indian border , a area like Rann of Kutch with intense hot an open battle ground.

Good read
https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/pakistan-army-tanks.asp
Pakistan Army Tanks of Military History - From the First to the Last

Consistently at odds with its neighbor India, Pakistan has been keen in maintaining a healthy stock of capable combat tanks throughout the decades.
 
Last edited:
.
Once again shown your desperation. From this photo and you can concluded its a T-72 auto loader? You simply just try any means to prove your fantasy point without any concrete backing?

Let me once again shown you the so called better stabilizing from Chinese tank. 5 score out of 5 hits and the tank never even needs to slow down to aim and shot becos the FCS and stabilizing are so superior.
Remember, this Chinese version is just a mediocre Type 96 tank , its not even Type 96B . Not to mention comparable to VT-4. Yet is superior on the move shooting trump anything Russian can throw at. You can claim its only T-72 but so as the Chinese with a mediocre Type 96 tank. This is not Type 99. You can imagine, we Chinese got even better stuff behind us.


Now i am having doubts over your sanity..

From your own footage..

Watch from 36:18.. the AZ style autoloader and its two piece ammo being loaded is in action.

Now please, dont come with another super duper explanation.


here is t-72 autoloader at work.. compare both.

 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom