What's new

Some Geographical Advantage Points of Pakistan That May Effect The Outcome of Future War in Kashmir!

This,,Despite being a defence site.
There r hardly any natural divides between India n Pakistan.
Btw Pakistan does have geographic advantages on other borders,,, but alas thr history shows they were never competent enuff to take advantage.

I think you quote the wrong person .
 
.
.
The case of the Khalistanis is the enemy of my enemy is a friend. Rest a lot of them don't like Pakistani or muslims very much. Baqi ache bure log har jaga hote hain.
We love the Chamb Jaurian region, always had an upper hand there.


I would suggest to organise a Khalsa Battalion/Unit in PA,with recruits taken from the globe and locally.
 
.
Lahore and Sialkot both are very hard for India.
Going By sudar ji Report
Lahore 18 hour away For our Strikes corps
Indian Northern Command Almost 70 % of your Entire Army Alone

Nevertheless We Will Strike were You are Most vulnerable Militarily
Sindh op hammer .gif
 
.
China has already started building bases in the atols of South China Sea, can the US stop them!
EYi6qC7WAAIIlv-


The case of the Khalistanis is the enemy of my enemy is a friend. Rest a lot of them don't like Pakistani or muslims very much.
In the UK we have a different view. The Khalistani ideology is much stronger in UK and Canada. Would love to recruit these boys.
soldiers.png


Going By sudar ji Report
Lahore 18 hour away For our Strikes corps
Indian Northern Command Almost 70 % of your Entire Army Alone
I think this time we have the Panu Akil cantonment and Shahbaz airbase with F16s to counter such moves. This Jaiselmir salient is surrounded by Pakistan ,have you noticed.
 
. . .
I think this time we have the Panu Akil cantonment and Shahbaz airbase with F16s to counter such moves. This Jaiselmir salient is surrounded by Pakistan ,have you noticed.
India Has Specially deployed Operationally For this

  • 861 Regiment (BrahMos Block I, deployed in north Rajasthan area)
  • 862 Regiment (BrahMos Block II, deployed in south Rajasthan area)

Main Is How Many number Strike corps You can Deploy in war
you have Only V corps for Whole Sindh We can Deploy
2+ corps against One

And Both this Corps have Rapid Mechanized And Armour-ed brigade's

With all the bases and toys ,has the US stopped China?

Have a look at this as well.
So You Posted A low Flame bait content You Wasted my time

And one in video is ITBP not IA

 
.
All "bulges" are only an asset if the PA mobilizes first & decides on taking offensive action via these inroads. Defence of bulges is very hard as you're technically surrounded by the enemy from 3 sides, hence making your position untenable and resulting in inevitable loss of territory. This was witnessed when the Phuklian Salient (Akhnoor Dagger) was easily taken by IA 26 Div elements against weak opposition (36 Punjab Coy + Rangers) - weak because you can't risk encirclement of a huge force. The PA 15 Div instead setup a defensive line along Head Marala, where they could meet Zoru's men frontally.

In case of Shakargarh Bulge, there was inevitable loss of land due to the same constraints, hence PA I Corps had laid down a couple of minefield layers and assembled a weak armoured brigade to delay the enemy advance (which was BTW done by a whole Corps) at strongpoints such as Harar Kalan. The main towns that were to be held at all costs were Zafarwal and Shakargarh - successfully done so, as their defence was easier considering the arc of defense was manageable. So while we lost significant territory due to passive defence, the road connection b/w Zafarwal & Shakargarh remained intact. You can say we traded space for time - same done in Gadra - Nayachor; it's extremely vulnerable to capture.

Present-day Haveli District (notable for Haji Pir Pass) was also lost due to the same geographical constraints, in '65.

Sehjra was also overrun due to same reasons.
 
.
Going By sudar ji Report
Lahore 18 hour away For our Strikes corps
Indian Northern Command Almost 70 % of your Entire Army Alone

Nevertheless We Will Strike were You are Most vulnerable Militarily
View attachment 634475

PAF is larger than your airforces northwestern command so what is your point?

Your tanks would overheat in that environment. Desert territory would be useless for either side. Cities such as Sialkot, Lahore, Amristar, etc hold a much greater value.
 
.
Think out of the box!! Think UAVs, EWs etc....

Take the air superiority; locate the enemy locations via land/air based radars, air assets etc.; and then employ UAVs, long range artillery, MRLs etc. to decimate them even when they're in the move....

The more your enemy uses the Russian/Israeli/French etc. systems the merrier....
 
.
Think out of the box!! Think UAVs, EWs etc....

Take the air superiority, locate the enemy locations via land/air based radars, air assets etc., and then employ UAVs, long range artillery, MRLs etc. to decimate them even when they're in the move....

Thats what im saying. Most of the IAF airbases are in the northwest region. about 12-13 bases in total. They should be hammered premptively with cruise/ballistic missile and air strikes. At the same time armored thrusts into armristar/east punjab front and infantry/taliban thrusts into the jammu/kashmir valley. Destroy their air force and cut off all routes to the valley, capture amristar to deal a huge pyschological blow to the core of the indian military (sikhs), then make their life hell in the Kashmir valley with street to street gun battles. We will see then who will fight like men.
 
. .
Key here would be a total rethink in strategy for pakistani armed forces. The strategy should be to inflict as much loss as possible on IAF bases in the north west region BEFORE their forces can react. This requires us to be proactive rather than reactive as we were in Feb last year. We much align our resources ie missiles and aircrafts to strike at predetermined air bases. Thermobaric warheads would allow for a much larger destruction radius against protected aircraft hangars. Missiles should strike first followed by fighter jets. Airbases close to the border can be followed up with UCAV's. Once aircrafts are taken out focus should quickly fix to destroying SAMS and army targets.

All this will require our forces to be fluid in war. Aircrafts change positions on airbases esp once attacked. Multiple waves following up will get rid of this issue.

I estimate following resources would be needed for the first few initial strikes
-A100 MBRL: Positioned to strike air bases close by such as pathankot
- NASR: same as above
-Ghauri/shaheen 1: Would take the bulk of airbases beyond 100km from the border within the northwest region
-Babur:Same as above
-Raad : Same as above
- Jf-17/F-16/Mirages: Launch standoff weapons to destroy any remaining aircraft targets
- Buraq/UCAVS: Launch guided missiles to destroy air crafts located at bases close to the border sub 100km

If we assume 12 IAF airbases in the northwest theatre then x15 ballistic missiles and x15 cruise missiles for each base would be about 360 missiles total. 15 fighter jets for each base targets we would need 180 Fighter jets and UCAV's for these initial strikes. All resources we have already available.

This strategy would allow us to use our geographical disadvantage to our complete advantage. Since Pakistan would only have to make airbases in northwest india inoperable whereby India would have to make every airbase in Pakistan inoperable.
 
.
Your tanks would overheat in that environment. Desert territory would be useless for either side. Cities such as Sialkot, Lahore, Amristar, etc hold a much greater value.
Hyderabad & Karachi is most Valuable
We Do Major Exercises For T-90 for this reason
Reason We Don't gone For Heavy Category Western tank same reason And T-90




Research about Were All Arjuns deployed all 118 of them

llks.jpg
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom