alaungphaya
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2012
- Messages
- 2,176
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
So... still no proof then.
Surely the burden of proof is on the accuser?
If the Burmese have nothing to hide then they should open up the area for international journalists. Why is it not open? What are the Burmese hiding?
That said fake video's and photo's do not support the Rohingya cause, those idiots that are using these should realize that they are hurting the credibility of the news about a real ongoing ethnic cleansing that has been going on for decades. Apparently these poor Rohingya's who are virtual slaves in their land do not have access to mobile phones or camera's to record the atrocities. But Ronigya's that are coming over to Bangladesh, they are telling first hand accounts of what happened. Rohingya's need to get better organized about recording the crimes and then disseminate them. This is the least they can do to take their message to the world community.
But regardless of how inept Rohingya's are about recording the crimes committed by Burmese on them, the biggest proof we have for this ethnic cleanisng is about 300,000 (official) to 500,000 (unofficial) Rohingya refugee's sitting in Bangladesh and not willing to go back, despite the pretty bad condition of living at the refugee camps. And there are another 500,000 to 700,000 Rohingya's living as refugees in regional and other countries (India, Pakistan, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia etc.).
Since Burmese cannot and will not open up the area, we have to go by what Rohingya's are saying that the death toll so far has been about 20,000 people killed. The burden of proving that this is false is on the Burmese.
Surely the burden of proof is on the accuser?