Six wars China is sure to fight in the next 50 years

[oiltrader]

Umm, you do know vk_man were talking about shale oil, not methane....

He and the article were claiming 126 trillion barrel of shale oil, that's impossible as 126 trillion barrel mean the mineable volumn of
20.16 trillion 20.2x10^12 square meters(1 trillion barrel per 160 billion sq m) while the geological figure of bazhenov was 1 millions square kilo meters (convert to 1.0x 10^12, 1 sq km = 1 million sq m) the different is 20 times bigger, that's the geological point of view

And not all those in area have 1:1 oil in place ratio hence you would expect some land were simply rocks but no shale oil in it so. The figure is simply impossible

Where are your assumptions for reservoir thickness ,porosity factor?or the oil bearing capacity of the rocks?

Assumptions on oil bearing capability of source rocks ,reservoir cap etc.

 

[faisal6309]

Idk who says this...but India definitely wants peace. Steps are being taken...and yah Pakistan should also stop its terrorist factory to stop all this.

After surrounding by enemies India want to go for peace now

And stop blaming Pakistan for producing terrorists. Our neighbors are safe because we are fighting them. That's why they are against our army. What if we let them go and do Jihad in India, Indian occupied Kashmir and Indian occupied Punjab etc.

 

[jhungary]

Where are your assumptions for reservoir thickness ,porosity factor?or the oil bearing capacity of the rocks?

Assumptions on oil bearing capability of source rocks ,reservoir cap etc.

The mining area was from the original quote from vk_man
The mineable volumn is according to US EIS report on international energy outlook

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Oil in place is from figure in IEA

 

[India_rocks]

After surrounding by enemies India want to go for peace now

And stop blaming Pakistan for producing terrorists. Our neighbors are safe because we are fighting them. That's why they are against our army. What if we let them go and do Jihad in India, Indian occupied Kashmir and Indian occupied Punjab etc.

Why are there attacks like 26/11 in India why bullets are being fired at LOC , why ? Cuz Pakistan army is giving cover fire to terrorists so that they can reach Indian before winter arrives...

 

[jhungary]

The mining area was from the original quote from vk_man
The mineable volumn is according to US EIS report on international energy outlook

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Oil in place is from figure in IEA

And indeed 126 trillion barrel is nearly impossible, that would plummet the oil market as this area alone can support the world oil consumption for 5000 years counting today oil consumption rate is 95 million barrel per day, lol....

 

[faisal6309]

Why are there attacks like 26/11 in India why bullets are being fired at LOC , why ? Cuz Pakistan army is giving cover fire to terrorists so that they can reach Indian before winter arrives...

If you think so then wait and see if they arrive in winter. It seems like you are on of those Indian extremists.

 

[vostok]

The bolded part

These words were beyond my quote. But that's not important.
Here's a picture that shows the current status.

http://www.balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=344307&download=2&type=.png
The U.S. has had 2 heavy icebreakers capable of walking in the winter in the Arctic. At the moment, there is only one - 1976 launched, which is currently undergoing a major renovation. It is planned to build another one - but it is unknown whether it will at all.
So if the U.S. will collaps, Alaska will have no choice except to some extent integrated into the Eurasian Union.

 

[Jackdaws]

This time it will be 1962 again not 1967.You have no Russia to back you.





Forgotten 800 year of rule of Islam on India.



Well,Indian army proved itself to be impotent. Atleast when Russia was behind you ,you had the guts to fire on us like 1967 and did not run away like 1962. But looking at how indian impotent army reacted,it will be repeat of 1962. No more Russia behind you.Plus your nation is ally of West and Wahabbis.

Yes Yes - go ahead. Will only talk about it? Or do you have the balls to do it?

 

[jhungary]

These words were beyond my quote. But that's not important.
Here's a picture that shows the current status.

http://www.balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=344307&download=2&type=.png
The U.S. has had 2 heavy icebreakers capable of walking in the winter in the Arctic. At the moment, there is only one - 1976 launched, which is currently undergoing a major renovation. It is planned to build another one - but it is unknown whether it will at all.
So if the U.S. will collaps, Alaska will have no choice except to some extent integrated into the Eurasian Union.

Umm...

When china do recover lost terrorities from Russia with US help, and Russia broken up into South Ossetia is the west, Chechen republic in the souh east, ural trans Mongol SGZ in the south, I will make sure to allow the Siberia to join the Alaskan Incorperated territories, then you will see Russia and alaska reunited

Day dreaming is not the sole Propertius right reserve for Russian only, we can also day dream

A world when Russia broken into 4, when the Jewish, Muslim, homosexual and Russian orthodox have their own piece of "Russia" wouldn't it be great?

 

[IND151]

Possibility of Indo-China war is low as of now; however we must retain the DOD capability on eastren border while maintaining superiority on western border.

 

[vostok]

Umm...

When china do recover lost terrorities from Russia with US help, and Russia broken up into South Ossetia is the west, Chechen republic in the souh east, ural trans Tibet zone in the south, I will make sure to allow the Siberia to join the Alaskan Incorperated territories, then you will see Russia and alaska reunited

Day dreaming is not the sole Propertius right reserve for Russian only, we can also day dream

A world when Russia broken into 4, when the Jewish, Muslim, homosexual and Russian orthodox have their own piece of "Russia" wouldn't it be great?

Who in 1935 believed that the Great British Empire would be bankrupt and will desintegrate in 10-15 years?
Who in 1980 was believed that the mighty Soviet Union, extended communist ideology to half of the world will fall apart in 10 years?
America - bankrupt. And it left not much time.

 

[Sashan]

That because we bringing $$$ to the US, keeping them from collapsing. Can't you even open your curry eyes out yet?

@Zakii @Oscar - please do note this racial quote.

 

[jhungary]

Who in 1935 believed that the Great British Empire would be bankrupt and will desintegrate in 10-15 years?

Fact is

British Empire were always not Bankrupt as you said. Basically the only colony British Lost after 1935 is India, Iraq/Iran, Palestine and Hong Kong. Show me fact that support the British Empire is all but bankrupt and destroy?

Did Britian has no control on Ascention Island in the Mid Atlantic?
Did Britain has no control on Falkland Island in South Atlantic?
Did Britain has no control on Gibraltar in the Mediterranean?
Did Britain has no control on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean??

YOu have to be stupid to say British Empire desintegrated. Let me show you a map with British and its oversea territories

Who in 1980 was believed that the mighty Soviet Union, extended communist ideology to half of the world will fall apart in 10 years?

Literally everyone is predicting the soviet doom is gonna go after the fail invasion in afghanistan. Even the Chinese Said so, basically the only one who does not believe or do not want to believe the Soviet is over the the Russia itself

There is even a page in Wikipedia on prediction the fall of soviet russia, check it out yourselve

Predictions of Soviet collapse - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

America - bankrupt. And it left not much time.

Lol come back to me when America bankrupt, hint, it will not be this year tho. Hahaha

Wrose, Russia is just named LESS PEACEFUL than rouge states North Korea

lol, seriously, according to an international study, Russia is BEHIND NORTH KOREA in peaceful life. Russian Ranked 155, North Korea Ranked 154. Yet you are claiming Russia will absort United States.....Really funny

Russia 155th in 2013 Global Peace Index | World | RIA Novosti

Report: Russia Less Peaceful Than North Korea | News | The Moscow Times

Russia 155th in 2013 Global Peace Index | Russia & India Report

Oh my god, Russian is even worse then the Rouge States, if i were you, i will pray for your own survival before you pray for a collaspe US......

 

[vostok]

Fact is

British Empire were always not Bankrupt as you said. Basically the only colony British Lost after 1935 is India, Iraq/Iran, Palestine and Hong Kong. Show me fact that support the British Empire is all but bankrupt and destroy?

Did Britian has no control on Ascention Island in the Mid Atlantic?
Did Britain has no control on Falkland Island in South Atlantic?
Did Britain has no control on Gibraltar in the Mediterranean?
Did Britain has no control on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean??

YOu have to be stupid to say British Empire desintegrated. Let me show you a map with British and its oversea territories

Literally everyone is predicting the soviet doom is gonna go after the fail invasion in afghanistan. Even the Chinese Said so, basically the only one who does not believe or do not want to believe the Soviet is over the the Russia itself

There is even a page in Wikipedia on prediction the fall of soviet russia, check it out yourselve

Predictions of Soviet collapse - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Lol come back to me when America bankrupt, hint, it will not be this year tho. Hahaha

Wrose, Russia is just named LESS PEACEFUL than rouge states North Korea

lol, seriously, according to an international study, Russia is BEHIND NORTH KOREA in peaceful life. Russian Ranked 155, North Korea Ranked 154. Yet you are claiming Russia will absort United States.....Really funny

Russia 155th in 2013 Global Peace Index | World | RIA Novosti

Report: Russia Less Peaceful Than North Korea | News | The Moscow Times

Russia 155th in 2013 Global Peace Index | Russia & India Report

Oh my god, Russian is even worse then the Rouge States, if i were you, i will pray for your own survival before you pray for a collaspe US......

In 1944, the pound ceased to be a world currency - the dollar has replaced it. Britain has maintained military bases on small islands, but has lost vast areas , almost all the income from which went into the coffers of Britain. Britain became the world's creditor, not the debtor - just like the United States in recent years. Britain ceased to be a world powerhouse , has lost supremacy at sea and in the end, even the loss of political independence.
And I can assure you that, until Gorbachev came to power, in the West no one believed that the Soviet Union will fall apart.
What do you mean Afghanistan? USSR army controlled a much larger area than it is now doing the U.S. Army. Soviet army did not need support of half the world to fight in Afghanistan. Unlike the U.S. Army, the army of the USSR confronted terrorists, trained, armed and financed by the U.S., not just a bunch of Bedouins who made the U.S. Army to sit on the a$ and afraid to shove nose from their bases - otherwise you will immediately shot in the back by your afgans servants.
USA - bankrupt . Their debt exceeded their GDP. Prisoners rate per capita is higher than it was in the USSR during the gulag . One-third of the U.S. population somehow receive food assistance from the state. If it is - is not bankrupt , I do not know what it is bankrupt.

 

[jhungary]

In 1944, the pound ceased to be a world currency - the dollar has replaced it. Britain has maintained military bases on small islands, but has lost vast areas , almost all the income from which went into the coffers of Britain. Britain became the world's creditor, not the debtor - just like the United States in recent years. Britain ceased to be a world powerhouse , has lost supremacy at sea and in the end, even the loss of political independence.
And I can assure you that, until Gorbachev came to power, in the West no one believed that the Soviet Union will fall apart.
What do you mean Afghanistan? USSR army controlled a much larger area than it is now doing the U.S. Army. Soviet army did not need support of half the world to fight in Afghanistan. Unlike the U.S. Army, the army of the USSR confronted terrorists, trained, armed and financed by the U.S., not just a bunch of Bedouins who made the U.S. Army to sit on the a$ and afraid to shove nose from their bases - otherwise you will immediately shot in the back by your afgans servants.
USA - bankrupt . Their debt exceeded their GDP. Prisoners rate per capita is higher than it was in the USSR during the gulag . One-third of the U.S. population somehow receive food assistance from the state. If it is - is not bankrupt , I do not know what it is bankrupt.

lol

You are starting to get stupid.

quote from Predictions of Soviet collapse

Predictions of Soviet collapse - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

George Orwell (1946 prediction)

the Russian regime will either democratize itself or it will perish

George Kennan-1947

[T]he main element of any United States policy toward the Soviet Union must be a long-term, patient but firm and vigilant containment of Russian expansive tendencies... Soviet pressure against the free institutions of the Western world

George F. Kennanis something that can be constrained by the adroit and vigilant application of counter-force at a series of constantly shifting geographical and political points, corresponding to the shifts and manoeuvres of Soviet policy

Leon Trotsky - 1936

In order better to understand the character of the present Soviet Union, let us make two different hypotheses about its future. Let us assume first that the Soviet bureaucracy is overthrown by a revolutionary party having all the attributes of the old Bolshevism, enriched moreover by the world experience of the recent period. Such a party would begin with the restoration of democracy in the trade unions and the Soviets. It would be able to, and would have to, restore freedom of Soviet parties. Together with the masses, and at their head, it would carry out a ruthless purgation of the state apparatus. It would abolish ranks and decorations, all kinds of privileges, and would limit inequality in the payment of labor to the life necessities of the economy and the state apparatus. It would give the youth free opportunity to think independently, learn, criticize and grow. It would introduce profound changes in the distribution of the national income in correspondence with the interests and will of the worker and peasant masses. But so far as concerns property relations, the new power would not have to resort to revolutionary measures. It would retain and further develop the experiment of planned economy. After the political revolution – that is, the deposing of the bureaucracy – the proletariat would have to introduce in the economy a series of very important reforms, but not another social revolution.

If – to adopt a second hypothesis – a bourgeois party were to overthrow the ruling Soviet caste, it would find no small number of ready servants among the present bureaucrats, administrators, technicians, directors, party secretaries and privileged upper circles in general. A purgation of the state apparatus would, of course, be necessary in this case too. But a bourgeois restoration would probably have to clean out fewer people than a revolutionary party. The chief task of the new power would be to restore private property in the means of production. First of all, it would be necessary to create conditions for the development of strong farmers from the weak collective farms, and for converting the strong collectives into producers’ cooperatives of the bourgeois type into agricultural stock companies. In the sphere of industry, denationalization would begin with the light industries and those producing food. The planning principle would be converted for the transitional period into a series of compromises between state power and individual “corporations” – potential proprietors, that is, among the Soviet captains of industry, the émigré former proprietors and foreign capitalists. Notwithstanding that the Soviet bureaucracy has gone far toward preparing a bourgeois restoration, the new regime would have to introduce in the matter of forms of property and methods of industry not a reform, but a social revolution.

Let us assume to take a third variant – that neither a revolutionary nor a counterrevolutionary party seizes power. The bureaucracy continues at the head of the state. Even under these conditions social relations will not jell. We cannot count upon the bureaucracy’s peacefully and voluntarily renouncing itself in behalf of socialist equality. If at the present time, notwithstanding the too obvious inconveniences of such an operation, it has considered it possible to introduce ranks and decorations, it must inevitably in future stages seek supports for itself in property relations. One may argue that the big bureaucrat cares little what are the prevailing forms of property, provided only they guarantee him the necessary income. This argument ignores not only the instability of the bureaucrat’s own rights, but also the question of his descendants. The new cult of the family has not fallen out of the clouds. Privileges have only half their worth, if they cannot be transmitted to one’s children. But the right of testament is inseparable from the right of property. It is not enough to be the director of a trust; it is necessary to be a stockholder. The victory of the bureaucracy in this decisive sphere would mean its conversion into a new possessing class. On the other hand, the victory of the proletariat over the bureaucracy would insure a revival of the socialist revolution. The third variant consequently brings us back to the two first, with which, in the interests of clarity and simplicity, we set out.[8]

You want more?

only fool would think USSR will never collaspe, people called it mile ahead and long time ago, only the ignorant russia still think SSR is feastible.