What's new

Six reasons why India should join Russian air strikes in Syria

Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
8 October 2015 RAKESH KRISHNAN SIMHA
Instead of always being a bystander during events of global import, it’s time India showed some spine
and acted like a responsible power.
Warplanes from multiple countries are screaming through the skies over Syria. On the ground, terrorist
groups are nibbling at Syria’s extremities. It is an environment that India should jump right into. Here
are six good reasons why India needs to send its well-trained and ferocious military to defend
beleaguered Syria.

India needs to show support for an ally
Currently, Russia is conducting airstrikes against ISIS, al-Qaeda and CIA-backed terror groups all by
itself. The Russian Air Force has brought a strong detachment of jet fighters and bombers to Syria, but
the fact remains that it is a solo act. Iran has provided shock troops to fight on the ground, but no
aircraft. India should send at least a squadron of jets for joint air strikes with the Russian Air Force
against terror groups. This is a matter that concerns India’s only strategic partner. When your friend is
in a fight, you enter the fray.

India’s counter-terror expertise can be a game changer
India’s experience in counter terrorism could play a decisive role in combating ISIS as well as CIA
supported terrorist groups such as the so-called Free Syrian Army. The Indian Air Force (IAF) and the
Indian Army have been fighting extremists in Kashmir and eastern India for decades. India also stamped
out separatism in Punjab after a take-no-prisoners campaign that lasted nearly 20-years. Such valuable
counter terror experience is precisely what Russia would appreciate having on its side in the Syrian war.

India’s armed forces will gain invaluable experience
Significant events are happening over Syrian airspace and beyond. Turkish Air Force F-16s that
attempted to come close to the action got a taste of Russian airpower when MiG-29s interceptors –
providing top cover – achieved radar lock on the F-16s. Turkey’s military admitted that as many as
eight Turkish F-16 jets patrolling the Turkish-Syrian border were “painted” by a MiG-29 as well as
surface-to-air missile systems based in Syria in two separate incidents.
This is an eerie replication of the 1999 Kargil War when Indian MiG-29s – which were providing top
cover to IAF jets targeting Pakistani intruders – achieved missile locks on Pakistan Air Force F-16s,
forcing the latter to disengage from the battle.
The airspace over Syria would be an environment that India’s MiG-29 and Sukhoi-30MKI pilots would
relish. Not only would they be right at home in the Syrian cauldron, Indian pilots would also gain
battlefield experience in a 21st century environment involving western air forces. The IAF would also be
able to test its ability to quickly airlift Indian troops into a war zone.
After the bombardment by Russian and Indian aircraft, the Indian Army would savour the prospect of
mopping up the remnants of the ISIS as well as CIA-backed rebel groups.

Fight them in Syria, not at home
There will be plenty of naysayers who will argue India should not enter the mess because they fear the
country will end up on the ISIS radar. But the point is to fight – and exterminate – ISIS in its home
base than in India. ISIS should not be given any breathing space which would allow them to expand out
of the Middle East. India – like Russia – faces a serious threat from these media and technology savvy
terrorist organisations that are able to radicalise its citizens via the internet. India, therefore, has every
right to destroy ISIS in its breeding grounds before it becomes a threat at home.

India’s stock will rise globally
Despite sending spectacular missions to the Moon and Mars and becoming an IT superpower, India is
still known as the land of holy men, tigers and Gandhi. What the country needs is an image makeover.
If India sends its armed forces to Syria, its stock will rise globally as one of the few countries able to
hit the ISIS. We are talking about fighting the world’s most vicious rebel group, whose terror has
achieved the impossible of making al-Qaeda look like a moderate bunch.
There is an ancient Indian saying – the brave shall inherit the earth. India’s leadership needs to bite the
bullet.

India’s entry will be a landmark geopolitical event
The Russian airstrikes in Syria could be the beginning of a more assertive BRICS group. Until now it
was the West which was enforcing no-fly zones and dictating terms. Now the Russian side is doing it –
not against small, defenceless countries but against real terrorists who are a global menace. This is a
significant development because Russia is finally taking decisive military action and has received wide
support internationally.
Importantly, Russian air strikes against opponents of the secular Bashar al-Assad government have
decapitated American foreign policy in the Middle East. People in the Middle East have front row seats
to the wilting of American power in the face of a determined Russia.
India has rarely intervened outside the scope of the United Nations. The country is known as the
reluctant superpower because it rarely ventures into global hot spots. If India sends its mighty defence
forces to support Syria, it would have the weight of over 1.2 billion people saying no to terrorist groups
holding a peaceful and secular country to ransom.
This is history in the making – don’t sit it out.
 
.
India would never oppose the United States. The United States is the puppet master to India's foreign policy.
 
.
India would never oppose the United States. The United States is the puppet master to India's foreign policy.


Even if India was open to antogonising the U.S., there is a very good commonsensical reason for not getting involved - It is not our fight.We have enough on our plate. Just like I appreciate Pakistan's decision to not get involved in Yemen, this too is something similar & with even less sense for us to get involved.
 
. . .
In these days, it's one country's volume of treasuries that dictates one's international prestige not one's capacity to strike on alien soil. The silly reasons like India needs to support ally, landmark geopolitical events or rising global stocks easily sound so illogical in a sense that most of the modern powerhouses gained those qualities without stepping into other's war.

As far as India's game changing counter terrorism expertise is concerned, I am doubtful if India's counter-insurgency forces that are familiar well in jungle warfare are really prepared for a similar sort in Syrian territory where not only the climate and environment vary quite differently but the opposition is supposedly far better trained (mostly battle hardened veterans) and better armed?
 
. .
Rather than sending em to syria I would place some air and land forces in Afghanistan, support Afghanistan's military. Off course if Afghanistan asksfor assistance. Retire a mig here put it over there.
This will calm some nerves down around.
 
.
Indians never had the "balls" to go out of india and fight. Read your history. All great powers of their times invaded india and ruled india.
"moaziz sarif, ap kay system main ya sahulat muyassar nahi hay".............. ap apnay mulk say bahir pangay lainay say baz rahain. warna apki lu*li kat de jay ge"
 
Last edited:
.
Not our dogs, not our fight.
That dogs are looking at our country from far...we must kill that DOG as kutte ki maut... We should not wait for that dog to get into our house.
 
.
Russians are doing good job n let them do... We neither have a wish to show our muscle nor we can afford to fight this isis all along on tax payers money.....
 
.
That dogs are looking at our country from far...we must kill that DOG as kutte ki maut... We should not wait for that dog to get into our house.

And how do you expect them to get to India from Syria/Iraq? Through Iran, Afghanistan and then Pakistan? LOL
 
.
And how do you expect them to get to India from Syria/Iraq? Through Iran, Afghanistan and then Pakistan? LOL

Actually many Indians are willing to be ISIS toilet cleaners. Most South Asians that join ISIS come from India or Bangladesh surprisingly, and not Pakistan
 
.
Indians never had the "balls" to go out of india and fight. Read your history. All great powers of their times invaded india and ruled india.
"moaziz sarif, ap kay system main ya sahulat muyassar nahi hay".............. ap apnay mulk say bahir pangay lainay say baz rahain. warna apki lu*li kat de jay ge"
Not balls not wanted to ...... We did in Myanmar , you started crying ....
 
.
Rather it would make more sense to place a squadron in afghanistan.
Syria is not our interest, whatever happens there?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom