Six Hard-Hitting Facts About the Syrian Conflict to Shut Up Western Apologists

[Hasbara Buster]

Six Hard-Hitting Facts About the Syrian Conflict to Shut Up Western Apologists

The truth about the Syrian mess is clear as day for anyone who cares to look

Originally appeared at Off Guardian

As France, the UK and now Germany obediently line up for war with Russia, feel free to send these to anyone who asks you “but do you think we should just let ISIS keep beheading people?”

1. Bashar al Assad’s secular government in Syria is a major obstacle to US/NATO ambitions to fragment the Middle East, exploit its resources and further encircle Russia, as delineated in several policy documents.

2. US/NATO planned to invade Syria and remove Assad in 2013, and used his alleged use of chemical weapons in Ghouta as an excuse. But the plan was thwarted when a) the chemical weapon attacks were found to have likely been done by western-backed “rebels.” and b) Russia intervened diplomatically to negotiated the decommissioning of Syria’s chemical weapons stocks, thus making any military action unneccessary.

3. US/NATO response to this was to develop ISIS (one of their several proxy jihadist groups fighting Assad) – as a new boogeyman. To arm them and train them while simultaneously developing a fearsome media image for them, in order to eventually justify the invasion of Syria they’d been forced to abandon. This new invasion would allegedly be about defeating ISIS, but would really be a relaunch of the original plan to get rid of Assad. And in truth ISIS would be working with the US/NATO, not against them.

4. This second plan also began to unravel firstly because ISIS and the other jihadists proved less successful at defeating the Syrian army than expected and secondly because Russia unexpectedly intervened and began bombing ISIS and the other NATO-backed proxy armies in the region.

5. Facing the potential final defeat of their plan for domination in the ME the US/NATO has mobilised its sock puppet leaders in Europe to reverse their earlier and wise decisions to stay out of Syria, and send in troops to fight the Syrian Army and Russia.

6. “Our boys” will not be fighting ISIS, whatever the media may tell you. ISIS is on our side. ISIS is NATO. “Our boys” will be fighting alongside ISIS and a ragtag of mercenaries and lunatics and sociopathic mass murderers killing Syrian civilians, soldiers of the Syrian army, and maybe even Russians (all of whom are actually fighting ISIS). Merkel, Hollande, Cameron and all the other smirking morons are obediently lining up for WW3 to defend US imperialism. Because they’re too torpid, corrupt and stupid to know what they are doing.

Six Hard-Hitting Facts About the Syrian Conflict to Shut Up Western Apologists

 

[yugocrosrb95]

People should stop posting this trash...

 

[war&peace]

Congratulate you on sharing such information on PDF...Keep the good work up and don't worry about trolls.
'

 

[Adecypher]

@Hasbara Buster
Sir, in your opinion is NATO ready to sacrifice their soldiers for Assad's removal? Do you see a direct conflict between NATO and Russian troops?

 

[TMA]

People should stop posting this trash...

Why do say it is trash?
It seems to make a lot of sense.

 

[yugocrosrb95]

Why do say it is trash?
It seems to make a lot of sense.

Yeah, jumping to conclussions and making assumptions makes sense, lets blame USA and not Saudi Arabia which is a muslim country because muslism don't blame muslims?!?

 

[oproh]

100% accurate, america and their dogs always spread chaos and havoc to any countries they go.

 

[yugocrosrb95]

100% accurate, america and their dogs always spread chaos and havoc to any countries they go.

...Russia isn't? Look at Georgia, Ukraine and now Syria by prolonging this chaos.

 

[TMA]

Yeah, jumping to conclussions and making assumptions makes sense, lets blame USA and not Saudi Arabia which is a muslim country because muslism don't blame muslims?!?

KSA is also to blame, but they don't have the brains like NATO.

 

[oproh]

...Russia isn't? Look at Georgia, Ukraine and now Syria by prolonging this chaos.

Third world countries like ukraine and georgia has always been chaotic, as for Syria you have to thank america and their dogs like your country croatia for supporting terrorism.

 

[yugocrosrb95]

Third world countries like ukraine and georgia has always been chaotic, as for Syria you have to thank america and their dogs like your country croatia for supporting terrorism.

This post is full of lies...

Ukraine and Georgia aren't third world countries... You're delusional/uninformed.

How is my country supporting terrorism? By giving away weapons to Kurds and supplying them with latest most modern bullpup assault rifle in the world?? lol

 

[Aurangzeb29]

Lets get some things straight...

1. Yeah some truth in that. Americans would prefer Assad to fall, so they can setup a Government that is pro-West so they can do business.

2. No the US/NATO did not plan to "invade" Syria, they planned to bomb the Assad regime because he crossed a "red line" in using chemical weapons. The claim that he used Chemical weapons was proven, but Russia backed him up and vetoed the resolution. In Russian Media they blamed the rebels as usual, because they would never criticise Assad or their proxies.

3. US/NATO didnt "develop ISIS" if you believe that you must be insane. Why would the West create a ultra- radical Islamist group that doesnt listen to orders from anyone, when they can get moderate Rebel group to do the exact same dirty work and setup a democratic Government that they can do business with, sign contracts, have it legally recognised globally, and control it by proxy?

The Danger with creating a group like ISIS or Al-Qaida is that it just takes 1 Radical Islamist in the leadership of these groups to "Kill the leader" and declare themselves Leader and they have effectively hijacked your entire group/project, its called "going rogue" - and the USA would never risk this. Much easier to setup a democracy because there are always corrupt elements you can use to divide and conquer. This is Imperialism rule 101.

USA's real "boots on the ground" are not ISIS, but the KURDS - but problem with Kurds is they are good defenders but not great at attackin and taking over territory outside their areas.

4. Rubbish. ISIS and other Jihadis were butchering their way to Baghdad and Damascus - the Iraqi Army was in full retreat, Assad was on his knees, and that would have been a disaster for USA which is why they intervened and even then it has taken approx 10,000 US airstrikes just to STOP this monster from taking over Baghdad and Damascus.

5. We are not likely to see "boots on the ground" so this theory is still out to dry.

6. More Rubbish. If anyone is responsible for killing the most civilians it is Assad the butcher who killed 7x more civilians than even ISIS. Ofcourse you wont learn that from reading Russian Media which is just a tool of the Kremlin, they give us the same kind of lies as Comical Ali the Iraqi Information Minister.

The other claim that Russia is fighting ISIS is only partly true, because so far they have been hitting the moderate rebels just as hard if not harder than ISIS.

Russia is bombing hospitals, mosques, schools, bridges, bakeries, by and large civilian targets, it is destroying the infastructure as much as it can, because this is how Russia goes to War, this is exactly what they did in Chechenya and more recently in Ukraine.