What's new

Sipah e Sahaba had about to reach Parliament

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
x993626_51838752.jpg.pagespeed.ic.2PsH8YlXpE.jpg

@Aeronaut @Oscar @nuclearpak @Leader @Jazzbot @RazPaK @Pak-one and others
 
.
I think they were always there
 
.
both Skaikh Family and Sipah e Sahabah has done nothing for the people of jhang and this such a beautiful area with fertile land and skilled man power is deprived of even basic necessities... all the game of power.. none of them is sincere with people..
 
. .
IS maulvi ko to na bc sardak par ghaseete we le chalo parliament.

Shakal pe hi lanat pardi hui hai.
 
. . . .
Pakistani leader of banned sectarian group gets parliament seat

Pakistan's Election Commission has awarded a parliamentary seat to the leader of a banned sectarian group that activists blame for the deaths of hundreds of people.

Ahmed Ludhianvi will represent the city of Jhang, in Punjab province, the commission ruled.

He came second in the constituency in a general election in May last year but was awarded the seat after the commission ruled that the candidate who came first had been involved in vote rigging and had defaulted on a loan, the commission said in a statement on its website.

Ludhianvi declined to comment on the commission's Wednesday ruling.

He has previously denounced Shi'ite Muslims, who make up about 20 percent of Pakistan's population, but has insisted he does not incite violence.

Activists worry that Ludhianvi's appointment will provide political cover for violent activists from the majority Sunni Muslim community and fuel creeping militancy in Punjab, Pakistan's biggest and wealthiest province and the power base of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.

Tahir Ashrafi, chairman of clerical umbrella group the All Pakistan Ulema Council, told Reuters that he was worried about Ludhianvi's sectarian agenda.

"He ran an election campaign on his anti-Shi'ite agenda, it is not possible that he won't bring it into the Assembly. He will want to use parliament to declare all Shi'ites as heretics," Ashrafi warned.

Ludhianvi was a leader in Sipah-e-Sahaba, a sectarian Sunni group that emerged in Jhang in the mid-1980s with the support of Pakistani intelligence agencies, which fostered militants partly to help battle Soviet invaders in neighbouring Afghanistan, before being banned in 2002.

The group reinvented itself as Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamat, which was banned in 2012. Ludhianvi's Twitter account describes him as patron-in-chief of ASWJ.

The group's offshoot, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, has evolved into one of Pakistan's most feared militant groups. It has claimed responsibility for attacks that have killed hundreds of Shi'ites.

The legislator ousted from the Jhang seat, Sheikh Muhammad Akram, denied the Election Commission's accusations and said he intended to appeal.

(The story corrects "minorities" to "Shi'ites" in translation of quote.)


Pakistani leader of banned sectarian group gets parliament seat| Reuters
 
.
both Skaikh Family and Sipah e Sahabah has done nothing for the people of jhang and this such a beautiful area with fertile land and skilled man power is deprived of even basic necessities... all the game of power.. none of them is sincere with people..
but much better thn ppp and their sister groups..

Who have the problem?
no body .. excluding .. Rawalpindi sanihay k qatilon k.
 
.
Congrats Maulana Ludhyanvi, Its 1 year late but still its time to celebrate. Lot more will be achieved in future, I'm not surprised that many of bugs and cockroaches would not like his presence in parliament but it is right time for his opponents to accept the reality that their time of ruling Pakistan's establishment and parliament is over. Welcome into Naya Pakistan.
 
.
He was disqualified because of him being allegedly convicted and a bank defaulter, not because him rigging the elections.
1102154610-1.gif


Line Number 4 and 5 for you from the same news article you've posted.. ;)
 
.
Line Number 4 and 5 for you from the same news article you've posted.. ;)
If there had been main allegations, then there is a recount, which in this case hasn't been. One can list X.Y.Z,A,B,C in petition but which one is considered relevant and which one is not is shown by the verdict.
 
.
So far in this thread, we have three different stories from three different news sources covering same news, none of them has neglected the rigging part. So there it is of significant importance in Akram Sheikh's disqualification. Admit it.. :azn:


If there had been main allegations, then there is a recount, which in this case hasn't been. One can list X.Y.Z,A,B,C in petition but which one is considered relevant and which one is not is shown by the verdict.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom