What's new

Sino-India relations heading towards dead end: Mishra

Durrani

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Sino-India relations heading towards dead end: Mishra

By Iftikhar Gilani

NEW DELHI: India-China relations are heading towards a dead end, India’s former national security adviser Brajesh Mishra said on Saturday.

Participating in a seminar on China’s Internal Scene at the Observer Research Foundation (ORF), Mishra, who held lengthy negotiations with the Chinese during the previous Atal Bihari Vajpayee regime, said the Chinese were keen to settle a boundary dispute with India, but felt the government in New Delhi lacked the political will to do so.

He said significant progress would have been made if the Vajpayee-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government had returned to power five years ago.

Mishra said India had two good opportunities to solve the boundary problem; during the prime ministership of Jawarharlal Nehru, and of Indira Gandhi in 1980. “There was no political problem then, but we created the problems ourselves,” he said. Saying that the situation now was grave, Mishra said steps should be taken to see that no conflicts arise between China and India.

He suggested that negotiations and dialogues with China, especially in the fields of culture and science and technology, should continue to give the impression of some kind of a normalisation process.
 
.
Sino-India relations heading towards dead end

thats obvious
 
. .
this is what majority here would love to see...(just my opinion..i would love to be wrong this time)

but " jahan baat TAKA ki ho wahan aur cheejein peechhe chhoot jati hain.." ..too many $$$ at stake for each country..so no deadend for now mr. mishra..:cheers:
 
. . .
Major problem is India providing Shelter to Dalai Lama's group.

Dalai Lama's group should go to USA. Otherwise, it shows that India is supporting Tibet independence!
 
.
Major problem is India providing Shelter to Dalai Lama's group.

Dalai Lama's group should go to USA. Otherwise, it shows that India is supporting Tibet independence!
Major problem is we can't just through out an old man who came to us for help that would be un ethical.
 
. .
Sino-India relations heading towards dead end: Mishra

By Iftikhar Gilani

NEW DELHI: India-China relations are heading towards a dead end, India’s former national security adviser Brajesh Mishra said on Saturday.

Participating in a seminar on China’s Internal Scene at the Observer Research Foundation (ORF), Mishra, who held lengthy negotiations with the Chinese during the previous Atal Bihari Vajpayee regime, said
point 1:the Chinese were keen to settle a boundary dispute with India, but felt the government in New Delhi lacked the political will to do so.

point 2: He said significant progress would have been made if the Vajpayee-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government had returned to power five years ago.

Mishra said India had two good opportunities to solve the boundary problem; during the prime ministership of Jawarharlal Nehru, and of Indira Gandhi in 1980. “There was no political problem then, but we created the problems ourselves,” he said. Saying that the situation now was grave, Mishra said steps should be taken to see that no conflicts arise between China and India.

He suggested that negotiations and dialogues with China, especially in the fields of culture and science and technology, should continue to give the impression of some kind of a normalisation process.

Read the emboldened lines. Brajesh Mishra, though a brilliant bureaucrat, is still a loyal member of the BJP - a political party. Hence these comments are to be taken in the light of political developments in the country. They do not hold weight in diplomatic circles - that power and authority rests with the person holding a diplomatic position at present.

Comments by Brajesh Mishra are for internal political reasons. It would have been a different story IF he was still the NSA.
 
.
Should China accept Kashmir and Sikh independence leaders?

DLLM should go to USA.

are u comparing a saint to some bunch of terrorists who dont even care for ppl. and by the way
1.India recognizes Tibet as an integral part of China
2.Tibetans in exile are not allowed to engage in political activities in India

Hope that answers your question :what:
 
.
Read the emboldened lines. Brajesh Mishra, though a brilliant bureaucrat, is still a loyal member of the BJP - a political party. Hence these comments are to be taken in the light of political developments in the country. They do not hold weight in diplomatic circles - that power and authority rests with the person holding a diplomatic position at present.

Comments by Brajesh Mishra are for internal political reasons. It would have been a different story IF he was still the NSA.

True :cheers:
 
.
are u comparing a saint to some bunch of terrorists who dont even care for ppl. and by the way
1.India recognizes Tibet as an integral part of China
2.Tibetans in exile are not allowed to engage in political activities in India

Hope that answers your question :what:

One side's freedom fighters are another's terrorists!

Dalai Lam, 14th is Western Whites and Black Indian interest, but not Chinese interest!

Who says Kashmir and Sikh activists are not freedom fighters?
 
.
One side's freedom fighters are another's terrorists!

Dalai Lam, 14th is Western Whites and Black Indian interest, but not Chinese interest!

Who says Kashmir and Sikh activists are not freedom fighters?

Care to explain the illegitimate demands and activities which they have done and for what cases they are wanted in china
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom