What's new

Singapore PM: Japan should admit mistake, China and Korea should stop repeatedly asking for apology

The Japanese are fooling around with history
They are using dirty double standard tactics trying to climb onto the bed where Amercans sleep

Abe's Apology: For Americans, Not for Asians
Why did Abe offer apologies specifically to Americans, but not to Japan’s Asian neighbors? In a word: national interest.

By David Eunpyoung Jee
May 05, 2015

In the heart of Washington D.C., trees along Massachusetts Avenue, where Embassy of Japan is located, were decorated with three flags: the District of Columbia, the United States, and Japan. Anyone could literally see that Washington was prepared to welcome Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Numerous standing ovations during his speech before the U.S. Congress demonstrated how close the United States and Japan are each other.

In addition to the celebration of friendship between the United States and Japan, another remarkable point of Abe’s visit came when he officially conveyed his “eternal condolences to the souls of all American people that were lost during World War II.” In contrast, during a speech in Harvard University, Abe chose not to acknowledge Japanese involvement in the sexual slavery of Asian women during the Pacific War. Why is Japan so two-faced? What makes Japan apologize to Americans but remains reluctant to admit its past wrongdoings despite constant demands from Asian countries? In a word — national interest.

What does Japan gain from a robust alliance with the United States? Japan is expected to gain from building better relations with United States in two aspects: economy and defense. On the economic front, Japan is expected to gain from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Japan’s GDP per capita is estimated to grow by 1.5 percent as TPP enhances Japanese trade volume and boosts foreign direct investment. Second, a good relationship with United States provides Japan with defense benefits. The recently revised U.S.-Japan Defense Guidelines allow Japan to play a more active military role hand-in-hand with the United States. The new defense guidelines give Japan more freedom of military action, which had been restricted by San Francisco Peace Treaty. Since the benefits from the alliance with United States outweigh the sentimental costs to Japanese people of conveying apologies for American casualties, Japan has no reason to hesitate in expressing condolences and delivering apologies to the Americans.

In the same way, as long as the benefits of fixing relations with Asian countries do not outweigh the sentimental costs of conveying apologies, which would require the Japanese people’s acknowledgement of what their grandfathers have done wrong, Japan will have no reason to extend clear apologies. Currently, it seems that Japan chooses not to apologize and acknowledge sexual slavery and massacres during World War II because the benefits from Asian countries are not considered significant enough.

According to the World Trade Organization (WTO), Japanese exports to China and the Republic of Korea account for approximately 25 percent of its total exports, but it could be considered negligible compared to the costs for the Japanese to admit what their grandfathers have done. It seems Japan is unlikely to apologize until Japan’s ties with Asian countries provide as many or more benefits than Japan gets from the U.S.-Japan alliance.

Abe’s U.S. visit shows that national interests can induce official apologies from Japan for its past wrongdoings. Many Asian countries, China and the Republic of Korea in particular, are not satisfied with Japanese apologies for their military actions during World War II and demand a more wholehearted apology from Japan via official channels. Unfortunately, it is unlikely that the Japanese will admit to the shameful deeds of their ancestors unless they get something in return, such as economic and defense benefits.

Therefore, there is a lesson that we can derive from U.S.-Japan relations. Appealing to sentiment has not been working, and it will not work in the future, but appealing to national interest will absolutely work. Asian countries should understand that emphasizing how useful and lucrative they could be to Japanese national interest, is the only way to gain official apologies from Japan. In the international arena, relationships are not about who is good and who is bad — it is all about give and take.

David Eunpyoung Jee is a Korea Foundation Associate Researcher of the Asia-Pacific Security Program at the Center for a New American Security. He previously served as a military officer at the operation center of Republic of Korea Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Abe’s Apology: For Americans, Not for Asians | The Diplomat
 
. .
And you should mind your own. He is in Asia Pacific, and his recommendations were very good, depicting the scene as it is.

@Nihonjin1051 My friend, I was disappointed that you upvoted this. Especially when Japan is essentially taking exactly the reverse stance. It is going all across the region, and not minding its own business.

And anyways my friend, it would be wise to follow Lee Hsien Loong's words.

Also, what views do you personally hold about the Nanjing Massacre?



Only you missed the first part completely. To get a society wide apology for Nanjing and comfort women. And a pointed apology, for these issues.



No. It will. It is never too late. Only the apology should be nation wide, felt by the society, and honest. It must also not skirt any issue.




Apology to Malaysia doesn't mean much. More than 95% of all damage and hurt was done to the people of Korea and China. It is they who need an apology and a honest one at that. Not the general rhetoric of Murayama statement, where half of the LDP is turning over ambiguous at even that mild thing.

A point blank, direct recognition of horrors. The location that would be most suitable will be Abe at the Nanjing Massacre Memorial.

I will ask you only 1 question who gives a damn
This is a east Asian matter & we should not interface in it
 
.
PM's words have logistic problem....If Japan has made sincere apology, why should SK and China repeatedly ask?
At least the people of Nanjing won't forgive if Japan's current PM doesn't go to the Nanjing Massacre Hall to make a formal speech.
@Nihonjin1051 I bet you don't have the guts to visit Nanjing Massacre Hall like most Japanese.

I will ask you only 1 question who gives a damn
This is a east Asian matter & we should not interface in it
It's about humanity. Nazi didn't interfere with most Asian countries, could India be a friend with Nazi?
 
.
PM's words have logistic problem....If Japan has made sincere apology, why should SK and China repeatedly ask?
At least the people of Nanjing won't forgive if Japan's current PM doesn't go to the Nanjing Massacre Hall to make a formal speech.
@Nihonjin1051 I bet you don't have the guts to visit Nanjing Massacre Hall like most Japanese.


It's about humanity. Nazi didn't interfere with most Asian countries, could India be a friend with Nazi?

Of course India will offer its Diplomatic support if asked if the Germans or the Japanese try to deny the crimes they have commited but with Economic powers like China & Korea already pressuring Japan why would you need our support
 
.
Of course India will offer its Diplomatic support if asked if the Germans or the Japanese try to deny the crimes they have commited but with Economic powers like China & Korea already pressuring Japan why would you need our support
It's not about diplomatic support, man. Just show some humanity towards WWII victims.
Millions of Japanese deny crimes, they think Unit 731 and Nanjing Massacre are fabricated...Not Germans.
 
Last edited:
. .
The problem of Japanese aggression did not start in world war 2 - the earliest incursions started during the Tang dynasty and as usual, the Koreans bore the brunt of it. This incursion was easily swept aside by the smaller but more advanced Tang navy in the battle of Baekgang.

Battle of Baekgang - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The second big invasion was during the Ming dynasty and this one was massive. The korean countryside was littered with dead until Ming dynasty intervention recaptured most of the Korean peninsula and culminated in a decisive battle at Noryang point with Ming admiral Chen Lin and Korean admiral yi Sunsin smashing the Japanese fleet.

Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–98) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here is Hideyoshi's standing order for the war:

"mow down everyone universally, without discriminating between young and old, men and women, clergy and the laity—high ranking soldiers on the battlefield, that goes without saying, but also the hill folk, down to the poorest and meanest—and send the heads to Japan"

There is actually a little know monument to that war in Kyoto that is still there today, the morbidly named 'Mound of ears'

Mimizuka - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If even the atrocities commited near 500 years ago are still remembered, do the Japanese right wingers expect China to let go of the massacres during WW2?




 
.
It's not about diplomatic support, man. Just show some humanity towards WWII victims.
Millions of Japanese deny crimes, they think Unit 731 and Nanjing Massacre are fabricated...Not Germans.

To correct you, Japanese kids learn about the war, and there is special mention of what happened in Mukden, Nanjing, even reference to Comfort women. The only ones who deny that Nanjing took place are conspiracy theorists and outlier groups.
 
.
I know about the Nanjing Massacre and accept that it happened. It was a dark and unfortunate episode.
Most evidence of Nanjing Massacre was actually photos by Japanese military journalists and western volunteers.
To correct you, Japanese kids learn about the war, and there is special mention of what happened in Mukden, Nanjing, even reference to Comfort women. The only ones who deny that Nanjing took place are conspiracy theorists and outlier groups.
The words you teach in history books I have seen...That way of narratives of history won't tackle the historic issue forever.
 
Last edited:
.
Here is Hideyoshi's standing order for the war:


I prefer this quote by the Lord Hideyoshi,

“Sheer effort enables those with nothing to surpass those with priviledge and position.”

Toyotomi_Hideyoshi_by_madart84.jpg


Most evidence of Nanjing Massacre was actually photos by Japanese milltary

Indeed, they were a dark period. The way our soldiers treated civilians after capturing the Chinese capital was too brutal.
 
.
.
I prefer this quote by the Lord Hideyoshi,

“Sheer effort enables those with nothing to surpass those with priviledge and position.”
How would you feel if Chinese one day turn that same "effort" to Japan?
China has for vast majority in history, been stronger and militarily more powerful.
If historically, China adapt the same logic, Japan would not be here today.

Going by that logic, Japan think that China would try to invade the US in the future?
 
.
It's not about diplomatic support, man. Just show some humanity towards WWII victims.
Millions of Japanese deny crimes, they think Unit 731 and Nanjing Massacre are fabricated...Not Germans.

No Indian will ever deny that these things happened trust me,sure we Indians troll you Chinese almost everyday on this forum but on many issues like this I assure you Indian people support the Chinese People

I prefer this quote by the Lord Hideyoshi,

“Sheer effort enables those with nothing to surpass those with priviledge and position.”

Toyotomi_Hideyoshi_by_madart84.jpg




Indeed, they were a dark period. The way our soldiers treated civilians after capturing the Chinese capital was too brutal.

I am gonna paste this on my wall,hell if a quote man
 
.
Singapore PM: Japan should admit mistake, China and Korea should stop repeatedly asking for apology


281.jpg


My Japanese friends are too nice and elegant, so i'm telling it for them. :yu:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Back
Top Bottom