Let's look at simple facts.
Pakistan had almost the same Hindu Sikh population in 1941 as the Muslim population in India.
See where are we now.
What does it point to?
Almost complete ethnic cleansing in Pakistan and an increasing Muslim population share in India.
If this hard data doesn't tell you the difference, I can't help it.
Absolutely. For you, your environment changed post conversion and that resulted in the formation of Pakistan (and you happened to be in the Western wing) in parts of India that happened to have higher Muslim population.
It had nothing to do with any past history of these Dharmic lands, just the Muslim population share and the TNT bases on Islam and how that makes one a separate nation.
BTW, I have nothing against your trying to associate with the pre-Islamic past on the part of some of you. That is an improvement over the majority Jahiliyah crowd.
Also I understand why you would necessarily have to go through stage 2 that I have outlined before some of you graduate to a stage 3 in a few decades from now.
So, we have had our say I guess.
That is because of the massive destruction wrought by primitive uncivlized barbarian invaders that indulged in massive destruction and rapine, plunder, slavery and forced conversion of your ancestors.
Did Pakistan have things like stoning people to death, chopping of limbs, rape of captured women as booty, camel piss drinking, marring and raping 9 year old girls, blowing up in market places to get your 72 earlier or did it come to you with your heroic invaders?
Have these been found at your archaeological sites?
What is sure is that none of this had anything to do with Islam.
No?
According to the UN estimates following were the pre-1947 percentages of Hindu and Sikh population in areas of Pakistan.
W. Punjab: 9% Hindu, 11% Sikh
Sindh: 10% Hindu, 5% Sikh
NWFP: 2.5% Hindu, 2.5% Sikh
Baluchistan: 3% Hindu
Over 50% of these figures migrated to India around the time of partition. Stop deliberately spreading false and incorrect information.
Also, Pre-1947 region of present-day Pakistan only had 15% non-Muslims, out of which half were Sikhs. Many of remaining half that were Hindus were actual migrants from the region of present day India during the British rule. For example, most of the Hindus in pre-1947 Karachi had migrated from Gujarat/Rajasthan during British rule because of Karachi's economic boom then.
And the lands of Pakistan were never Dharmic since the earliest historic times in any sense of the way and history proves it beyond any reasonable doubt. In any case Dharmic, Indic, Hindutva etc are racist terminologies which are used to spread the farce of a so-called superior supra-religion like the German Aryan race theory.
The Two nation Theory was not based on religion alone. It is primarily an Indian spread misinformation. The Two Nation Theory comprised the following major elements:
Religious differences
Governing differences
Civilizational differences
Cultural differences
Societal/Social differences
Economic differences
Political differences
You can live with your stages from being racists to supra-racists, as if any of us bothers.
Compare the massive destruction wrought by primitive uncivilized barbarian invaders that indulged in massive destruction and rapine, plunder, slavery and forced conversion etc with the deaths that occurred in Mahabharata and calculated by purest of the pure Indian Hindus - 1.66 Billion people. Can you imagine. From Rig Veda to other scriptures to Mahabharata, war is the primary element that is discussed and you have the temerity to accuse others of mass murder.
What is thankfully certain is the fact that there is no link of the Indus valley Civilization with Vedic or Hindu culture and since the earliest times Hinduism has never been a majority religion in Pakistan.
