Should we boycott amir khan and Shahrukh khan for their statement bringing bad fame to country?

[paritosh]

Wow, Telling that country is not worth living (Totally False) is expressing opinion and exercising boycott right is wrong. The champions of free speech.

He has voiced his opinion about a lot of issues in India. In my opinion he has done a lot of justice to his elevated position as an opinion leader for the masses.
Now when he says that he wants to leave the country for intolerance, you guys want to boycott the films to send a message?
There are so many people who do not like the idea of personal liberties being taken for granted and are protesting against the possibility of regressing as a society.
I agree that giving up citizenship is cowardly, but what I do not like is the fact that we want to fight an argument on our intolerance by expressing intolerance.
It's not the British Raj that we are boycotting, it's an Indian movie star who has been celebrated for his contribution towards the society for decades, boycott seems excessive. Cessation of dialogue is what leads away from democracy, like it or not.

 

[Dubious]

Is he next to be told off?

Rishi Kapoor keen to visit Pakistan | The Indian Express

 

[ranjeet]

That's not what people are saying around here...dismissing sentiments.
Why do you want people to prove their patriotism at every step? Intolerance is on the rise, you can't admit every concern as anti-national sentiment!
Everybody is free to be critical of anybody I hope you don't consider it a crime to hate Modi.



Very well put. Over-reacting is a classic sign of intolerance.

No one care about patriotism, it's about the whole drama about intolerance. one Akhlaq dies and people start losing their mind. Where as no one gave two squirts of p!ss about Tuktuki Mondal. Why? Just because the incident happened in Secular land of West Bengal? or the perpetrators were muslims? or the victim was a minor hindu girl?

 

[Koovie]

Hi Friends,

We listened to the statements of Amir Khan and Shahrukh Khan. They can not be called anti national but they are certainly something which bring bad fame to to country and most important of all is that they are false. The whole world is radicalized. Europe, America and other western countries are no Exception Forget about Arab Countries. There is no other place better than india. India is the most peaceful country today inspite of all this false propaganda. These our so called celebrates have got a lots of fame, money and love from country. Even though they never miss any opportunity to insult country. Their loyalty is more for Dawood and less for country.

I have a simple question. Can we boycott them? We have made them Heros and we can make them Zero. We have to take a principle stand. Boycott everything related to them. Their movies, Their Programs and the goods they advertise. I listen that some one told snap deal that we shall cancel all the deals with you if you keep Amir as your Brand ambassador.

I have decided that I am not going to watch any movie of Amir Khan or Shahrukh Khan in theater. If they have the right to express their (Dishonest) Opinion than we too should have the right to boycott them.

How many of you are agree with me or disagree with me? I want to know your frank opinion.

India is the best place to live now? India is a developing nation with tons of problems.
If India was the best place or the safest, you would have different statistics.. may it be per capita income, HDI, deaths from "simple" diseases, poverty, immigration into India etc etc etc

Clean up your head and get back to reality son.

And you talk about radicalization... yet you want to boycott people for their opinions?

Kinda ironic, isnt it?

 

[Airdef95]

where?


yup with more intolerance:

Shiv Sena hits out at Aamir Khan, says he appears to be a hero in Satyamev Jayate and talks about leaving India - IBNLive

Shiv Sena hits out at Aamir Khan, says he appears to be a hero in Satyamev Jayate and talks about leaving India - IBNLive

Om Puri demands apology from Aamir Khan for ‘intolerance’ remark | The Indian Express

City NGO demands apology from Aamir Khan for ‘unsafe India’ remark | punjab$ludhiana | Hindustan Times

Aamir Goes From Hero No. 1 to Villain No. 1


Maybe they should stop airing his movies out of india for money Why ask foreign audience to see something they cant tolerant just for money and name fame (india going global)?

I agree ... Salman khan's new movie is in our theaters right now.... Our media should highlight our neighbor's request and the movie thus should be banned in our cinemas...
Hope that'd be a friendly gesture from our side....

 

[Myth_buster_1]

Lol we have characters who bash Pakistan military and wright novels about it and Indians call it freedom of speech. And when Indian celebrities express their thoughts about situation in India they are labeled traitors.... Lol Indian democracy my foot. .

 

[ghazi52]

 

[jamahir]

Where as no one gave two squirts of p!ss about Tuktuki Mondal. Why? Just because the incident happened in Secular land of West Bengal? or the perpetrators were muslims? or the victim was a minor hindu girl?

you should cease your anti-muslim anti-progressive propaganda.

below is the complexity of tuktuki's case...

from ( Tuktuki Mondal case underlines the deep religious fault lines in India | Business Standard On The Beat )...

Mondal made a sudden appearance in the local police station and was subsequently produced before the magistrate. In her statement, Mondal claimed that she was physically abused by her father and she had no desire to return to her parents. To make the situation even more murky, an elopement angle allegedly involving a Muslim boyfriend has been hinted at but there is no clear evidence either way.

The Hindu activists are convinced that the police are lying to serve powerful political interests. Some have even suggested that Mondal is trying to protect her parents from wrath of domineering Muslims allegedly active in her district. Liberals, citing the exact same evidence, are equally convinced that this is another instance of the Hindu Right communalizing the assiduously secular environment of Bengal for narrow electoral gains.

But hypocrisy aside, why are liberals so willing to believe the official version in this particular instance. Is it because they condone abduction or rape as long as the alleged offender is a Muslim as many on the Hindu Right implicitly believe? The very idea is absurd and deserves no further consideration. Rather, it is the Hindu Right’s attempt to link every alleged crime committed by a Muslim directly with Islam which leads to the liberal reflex reaction. Because it is no longer about an individual Muslim but the larger community and protecting minorities is the first principle of modern liberalism.

A Hindu accused of criminality is merely an individual who is depraved and no reflection of the religion he purportedly professes. But the same consideration does not extend to a Muslim especially if he is accused of sexual crimes against Hindu girls. He automatically transmogrifies into an Islamic warrior discharging his religious duties. A Muslim does not rape a Hindu girl for the same reasons as a Hindu —it is intrinsically linked to his duties as the sword of Islam. Or as some crudely argued at the height of debate about Love jihad: Muslims have a higher ‘propensity’ to rape . It is hardly surprising that many Hindu activists have linked this incident to religious conversion and theocratic fascism of the states likes Pakistan. Tuktuki Mondal is another Rinkie Kumar or else why would a Muslim allegedly rape a Hindu girl? Indeed, unfair as it may be in particular instances, It is hard to take Hindu activists seriously when they simply cannot countenance a Muslim girl falling in love with a Hindu boy except as a giant conspiracy designed to alter India’s demographics.

and look at the nri sanghi brigade talking about tuktuki... ( note that "india today" magazine is sympathetic to sangh hence the title )...

why don't these nri sanghis admit that security and conditions for ladies ( tuktuki's case does not apply here ) were much better under the communists??

did these saffroni females demonstrate similarly whenever sanghis in india have done gentlemanly "moral policing" against ladies??

and did they protest sanghi atrocities against hindu ladies who only wanted to be with muslim or christian men?? did they protest against the fake conspiracy theory called "love jihad" ( love jihad in india - reality exposed by operation juliet )??

those two females in the picture need some lessons in how to be feminine.

 

[ranjeet]

you should cease your anti-muslim anti-progressive propaganda.

below is the complexity of tuktuki's case...

from ( Tuktuki Mondal case underlines the deep religious fault lines in India | Business Standard On The Beat )...





and look at the nri sanghi brigade talking about tuktuki... ( note that "india today" magazine is sympathetic to sangh hence the title )...

View attachment 274815

why don't these nri sanghis admit that security and conditions for ladies ( tuktuki's case does not apply here ) were much better under the communists??

did these saffroni females demonstrate similarly whenever sanghis in india have done gentlemanly "moral policing" against ladies??

and did they protest sanghi atrocities against hindu ladies who only wanted to be with muslim or christian men?? did they protest against the fake conspiracy theory called "love jihad" ( love jihad in india - reality exposed by operation juliet )??

those two females in the picture need some lessons in how to be feminine.

You better watch her interview rather than reading these jihadi material. you fake feminist.

 

[HariPrasad]

India is the best place to live now? India is a developing nation with tons of problems.
If India was the best place or the safest, you would have different statistics.. may it be per capita income, HDI, deaths from "simple" diseases, poverty, immigration into India etc etc etc

Clean up your head and get back to reality son.

And you talk about radicalization... yet you want to boycott people for their opinions?

Kinda ironic, isnt it?

You have taken a very narrow and materialistic view t judge the place like india. You are too immature to discuss the beauty of a country where 1.27 crore people live happily and peacefully in very limited resources, our festivals, colors, love, education, value system, family system, social system, peaceful coexistence, our ability to handle complex issues, how india is the least vulnerable country to ISIS like terrorist organization etc etc. You can not go beyond, GDP, Per capita income and HDI.

Now when he says that he wants to leave the country for intolerance, you guys want to boycott the films to send a message?

See i have answered this many time. and need not repeat it again and again. Search the forum.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

You have taken a very narrow and materialistic view t judge the place like india. You are too immature to discuss the beauty of a country where 1.27 crore people live happily and peacefully in very limited resources, our festivals, colors, love, education, value system, family system, social system, peaceful coexistence, our ability to handle complex issues, how india is the least vulnerable country to ISIS like terrorist organization etc etc. You can not go beyond, GDP, Per capita income and HDI.



See i have answered this many time. and need not repeat it again and again. Search the forum.

I told you before, intelligent debate is not for you

 

[HariPrasad]

I told you before, intelligent debate is not for you

yes I know stupids have different definition of rational debate. Stupids never grow up and never learn. Only their age increases.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

yes I know stupids have different definition of rational debate. Stupids never grow up and never learn. Only their age increases.

It is a proven fact that you really, really, really are a moron. I'm not saying this to insult you. It's just a fact.

 

[HariPrasad]

It is a proven fact that you really, really, really are a moron. I'm not saying this to insult you. It's just a fact.

Why did you wrote really only 3 time write it 10 times. That will strengthen your argument 3.33 times more. Idiot of avval Number. Saying you a moron is infact the insult of Moron.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

Why did you wrote really only 3 time write it 10 times. That will strengthen your argument 3.33 times more. Idiot of avval Number. Saying you a moron is infact the insult of Moron.

See, I quoted a fact and you responded with an insult. This is the sorry state of affairs here.