Should Rajput Class Destroyers be Transferred to Vietnam and Philliphines

[DrSomnath999]

ONLY

FRANCE ASTER 30 & US NAVY SEA RAM SYSTEM IS CAPABLE TO ENGAGE SUPERSONIC CRUISE MISSILE.

well no other known sytem has been able to replicate it ,if chinese SAM can be able to intercept a subsonic cruise missile it's a great achievement for them, forget supersonic cruise missile & that too brahmos

 

[RA-ONE]

What the current spec of these destroyers.. which are basically Kashin-II's right??

yes you are right but modified with Barak,Brahmos & Dhanush missile system.with space for 1 no Helicopter...

 

[oct605032048]

ONLY

FRANCE ASTER 30 & US NAVY SEA RAM SYSTEM IS CAPABLE TO ENGAGE SUPERSONIC CRUISE MISSILE.

well no other known sytem has been able to replicate it ,if chinese SAM can be able to intercept a subsonic cruise missile it's a great achievement for them, forget supersonic cruise missile & that too brahmos

Just like less than 2 years ago, no one in India believes J20, you are more than welcome to make an advertisement for HHQ9 and HHQ16.

 

[arp2041]

just to bring clarity on this issue, i want to ask exactly what does Indian Navy do with its major decommissioned ships?

 

[SP!TF!R3]

It's just as easy to move the missile on a ship.

1st..as we are MTCR signed state,we can only deliver missiles that has range within 300km.
2nd..BRAHMOS is virtually impossible to stop bcoz of short reaction time,terrain hugging features and highly maneuverability.your logic of subsonic missile is better than supersonic missile is flawed.

 

[Federer]

just to bring clarity on this issue, i want to ask exactly what does Indian Navy do with its major decommissioned ships?

They are either used as Target Practice or Scrapped.

 

[SP!TF!R3]

Just like less than 2 years ago, no one in India believes J20, you are more than welcome to make an advertisement for HHQ9 and HHQ16.

thats because even you,chinese guys don't have any clear specs of your weapons system and not a single report of testing(of any missiles)..so nobody knows that even your missiles are real or just some wooden replicas..get it??

 

[DrSomnath999]

Just like less than 2 years ago, no one in India believes J20, you are more than welcome to make an advertisement for HHQ9 and HHQ16.

well after all great advertisement no one is stiil interested to buy Hq 9 but Chinese interested in RUSSIAN S 400 system

 

[oct605032048]

thats because even you,chinese guys don't have any clear specs of your weapons system and not a single report of testing(of any missiles)..so nobody knows that even your missiles are real or just some wooden replicas..get it??

probably we intercepted a missile and a satellite in the space using some wooden replicas as well.

 

[RA-ONE]

probably we intercepted a missile and a satellite in the space using some wooden replicas as well.

HQ-9 is a unlicensed copy of S-300V. : TVC of HQ-9 is exposed , while TVC of S300V is not exposed.
Any one can hit a Satellite,let me explain if a balastic missile have a range of say 4000 km then it can reach too a altitude of nearly 2000K, and destroy any SAT at that height.

 

[arp2041]

They are either used as Target Practice or Scrapped.

than it is better to transfer the ships to other nations to build a good & enduring friendship (maybe build some enemies too).

 

[oct605032048]

HQ-9 is a unlicensed copy of S-300V. : TVC of HQ-9 is exposed , while TVC of S300V is not exposed.
Any one can hit a Satellite,let me explain if a balastic missile have a range of say 4000 km then it can reach too a altitude of nearly 2000K, and destroy any SAT at that height.

Even India can send a missile to that height. But a satellite is not as big as a 100km*100km target region of AgniV. You want to hit a satellite, you'll have to find it first, then lock the specific orbit of an 7km per second object with an accuracy of centimeter level in the space.

Too intercept a 4000km balastic missile is even more tricky, because it's track is harder to forecast than any satellite. But we did it in the space.

 

[śūnya_0_Zero]

Even India can send a missile to that height. But a satellite is not as big as a 100km*100km target region of AgniV. You want to hit a satellite, you'll have to find it first, then lock the specific orbit of an 7km per second object with an accuracy of centimeter level in the space.

Too intercept a 4000km balastic missile is even more tricky, because it's track is harder to forecast than any satellite. But we did it in the space.

space objects are easier to track than an incoming missile, which can have decoys, MIRVs and intelligent unpredictable paths (unlike satellites, which only have centripedal acceleration under the force of gravity).

it is a stated and accepted fact that A5 has a significantly lower CEP than DF-31 (leave alone the earlier chinese missiles which have CEP is kms, not meters).

 

[SP!TF!R3]

probably we intercepted a missile and a satellite in the space using some wooden replicas as well.

that proves you have asat capability...any report on your anti cruise missile capability???any videos???

 

[danger007]

Fast attack ships works in the near sea which just suits the case when the Indian fish is served on our table.

You don't even have half of USN 7th fleet fire power, and you started feeling like you are mighty..... don't try to be smart, sharks are extremely dangerous....