Either,both...playing on words are absolutely no sense.I just notice that Arunachal is integral part of both Chinas.
Lol we are ruling over what you claim is 'your' integral part ....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Either,both...playing on words are absolutely no sense.I just notice that Arunachal is integral part of both Chinas.
sure we can command you, you are not 2 years old, right, you have seen some of the world right?
You don't want to take orders? Fine, then work harder as a nation, or else you will just be like the countless other protesting fools, you know their names? Neither do i cause they are dead and irrelevant. The world only remembers the strong.
As a smaller power, you will be taking it laying down, or you can challenge us, but that's never a good idea. The last nation to stand up to a great power, well Ukraine's kinda divided, so....
Whatever Indian occupied China's territory and both of the two countries being enemies each other naturally.
To clear things up:
Both the PRC and the Republic of China (ROC) believe in the "One China Policy".
The disagreement is whether the PRC or the ROC is the true representative of all "China".
All the major nations on Earth, as well as the United Nations and international law, consider the PRC to be the true representative of China. In international events and organizations, the ROC uses the name "Chinese Taipei".
The bottom line is you can only recognize one as the true representative of China, either the PRC or the ROC.
If India formally recognized the ROC that would mean the immediate cutting of all ties to the PRC. And if India and the PRC no longer legally recognized each other, border clashes could easily lead to a repeat of the 1962 War.
Personally I do not believe India has the guts to do this, we will see though. I would be quite interested to be proved wrong.
Either way, there will be some interesting times ahead.
India recognized One China based on some agreements ..... Now that those agreements are being violated the stance will be changed.
we have habit of giving away a lot without getting anything in return .
We did it with China when it was at its weakest ...we did it with Pakistan at the time of signing Shimla pact ...
( We released 90,000 POW and many of our soldiers are still languishing in Pakistan jails since 1974 ....)
we have to stop this ... !
I agree with you regarding the Indian POWs languishing in Pakistani Jails, We should have used that opportunity to free them. I have little info. regarding the agreements between India and Pakistan after 1971 regarding POWs.
Atleast India should have asked for the Azad Kashmir, this would have solved our Central Asian Dilemma which we are facing now.
In the Past India is a poor country who cannot afford war for a long time. A country projects its power based on its Military might backed by Economy. Back in 1960's and 1970's India is not a strong country.
China not only supported Pakistan's nuclear program But time and again armed Pakistan to teeth.
Today the threat is very clear Chinese are in Azad Kashmir and are building their capabilities, what is more alarming is that Pakistani Establishment is completely collapsed and they will accept any conditions of China which is seen as a savior.
What ever defense equipment we are seeing in Chinese Arsenal will end up in the hands of Pakistanis once if there is any friction or war like scenario.
I think this is the right time for us to establish strategic, military and economic relations with Japan and Taiwan.
Japanese are waiting for the invitation of Indian Navy to do Malabar exercises and the stop gap visit of Taiwanese VP is a signal that Taiwan is ready for deeper co operation with India.