I was wondering if you were aware of the following two facts:
First fact. Indira Gandhi created the legendary Bhindrawale to counter BJP influence and that of the Akali (Ba)Dal. And, once an Indian general defected to his camp and the Sikhs declared freedom from Indian occupation, the Indian army invaded and desecrated the holiest shrine of the Sikh religion, the Golden Temple.
She ended up being killed by her guards who were also Sikhs and the followers of the same individual. After this, a Sikh genocide took place where the people of Gandhi's party, the Congress, lynched, murdered and raped Sikhs in a fashion no different than a European pogrom against the Jews, prior to and/or during the world wars.
Second Fact. Rajiv Gandhi invaded Sri Lanka and conducted a Tamil genocide (just as the Indian army did, now, as per the Sri Lankan Tamils' claims) along with the Sinhala whilst trying to destroy the terror group of Prabhakaran (who, they also created themselves like his mother created Bhindrawale, before him).
What was really amazing in this situation was that the Indians had trained these people to secure their Southern Tip by making this pro-India group take over and secure the northern parts of Sri Lanka where they had a majority, although they massacred Sri Lankan Muslims to maintain this majority. The Sri Lankan Muslims are sometimes called "Moors" (due to their historic relation to the Moroccan empires) but they are mostly Tamils. They are identified as a different group due to Tamils and Indian Hindus not trusting them for their support for the Sri Lankan state and the Muslims' respect for Sinhala culture and language (most Muslims are bilinguals while the Tamils don't bother learning the majority Sinhala language).
Anywhoo, the northern part of Sri Lanka had been used as a fueling station by Pakistan while flying to it's Eastern wing, especially when India made itself a no-fly zone for Pakistan (it was put on display during '71 when India felt a threat from West, East but also from the South, which got them shivering).
As it is clear, this was threatening to India not only because of the potential of attacks coming from the South but also the potential for the unification of the two Tamil lands. This is why the Tamils cannot do any port building or development in the Sethusamudram (body of water between Sri Lanka and India) due to a belief imposed by Northern Indian Hindus about Ram and Hanuman (the monkey or "venera" that actually signifies the bigotry the people of the north have towards the darker people of the South). These two fine gentlemen saved Sita from the grips of the devil (or King of Lanka), Ravan in a mythical or highly fantasized epic known as the Ramayana. After her being rescued and being brought back to India, "Divali" is celebrated, (just a small piece of information for those who don't know. I am sure you know, though).
The most ironic part about this tale is that the Hindus of the South don't believe it or want to have anything to do with it because of its underlying discrimination, bigotry and racism due to them being portrayed as the monkey, Hanuman or "venera". Therefore, the CM of Tamil Nadu asked the Hindus of the North, Who is Ram? What school did he go to? We don't know any Ram!
Another reason they don't believe in this 'epic tale' is because of it being a hindrance in connecting to the Ceylon Island. Therefore, Karunanidhi made the statement above, when they weren't allowed to build any bridges over Sethusamudran and connect themselves with the Tamils of Northern Sri Lanka.
The Northern Indian Hindus feel threatened as the Tamils might separate or "unite", which is why they shove this myth down their throats despite them not even knowing who Ram is. They only believe in Shiva. Furthermore, the Tamils feel they have nothing in common with the Hindus of the North and feel that there is no difference between them and the Tamils of the North of Sri Lanka.
So, the Indians created this terror group, the LTTE, which was there to prevent two events from taking place. One, the South part of India ever being attacked and two, the Pakistanis ever using it to go to Bangladesh after India declares itself a no-fly zone. The LTTE went quite far into the Southern parts of Sri Lanka and even when the Indians now reminisce over this "glory", they say, had we had stingers, we could've taken Colombo.
When the LTTE started to become an existential threat for India and the South started to slip away, they thought of a plan. They used the LTTE running havoc in Sri Lanka and the relations between the two nations about to falter as a pretext to attacking a group, they created themselves.
When India attacked the Tamil areas of Sri Lanka, it couldn't fight in guerrilla wars of a heavily forested area, which is why their soldiers ended up going into villages and killing innocent boys, young men and even women and children (since both of them are also used by the Tamil Tigers), simply due to 'suspicion'
When the troops were pulled back because no result could have possibly been achieved, the sentiment amongst the Indian Tamils had already been extremely against Rajiv Gandhi and his government, as a result of this operation. He was eventually killed by an INDIAN Tamil but it was blamed on Sri Lankan Tamils so as to not draw any parallels or relation between the two communities and promote the suppressed sentiments of separation. Even after the recent war, there were Tamils arrested for burning the Indian flag in the streets for what the Tamils called a joint-operation between the Sinhala and the Indians to root out the LTTE and kill it's leader in cold blood. The Tamils (both sides) saw it as betrayal.
In short, as everyone can clearly see and understand, it is the Indian army that has a proven and documented history of creating terror groups that eventually come back to bite them or more appropriately, [their chickens] come home to roost.
Pakistan hasn't even experienced the slightest of what India has when it comes to their idiotic and poorly executed proxy battles.
)....
