What's new

Should India Invade Pakistan?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aur hum use state banane ki soch rahe hain. :rofl:

:) ap log abhi tak gora sarkar ki colonialism walay mindset say hee nahi niklay.

bili ko ko bhee bohat tang karo to punja marti ha .
 
.
Former UN diplomat and current Indian MP Sashi Tharoor has described India's "Israel envy" and warned Indians against it in the following words:

Hamas is in no position to repay Israel's air and ground attacks in kind, whereas an Indian attack on Pakistani territory, even one targeting terrorist bases and training camps, would invite swift retaliation from the Pakistani army. And, at the end of the day, one chilling fact would prevent India from thinking that it could use Israel's playbook: The country that condones, if not foments, the terror attacks on India is a nuclear power.

Haq's Musings: India's Israel Envy
 
.
35tnhs.jpg

487712_287569391342206_262534387_n.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRK
. . .
India set up terror training camps on its soil in 71 to exploite the internal issues of East Pakistan by training terrorists.

the civil unrest in Pakistan was duely taken advantage of by India. owing to geographic hurdels and other such factors Pakistan was unable to thwart Indian State terrorism then. Hence Bangladesh (then East Pakistan).came into being.


Anyway its no more 71 neither India has the balls to do anything like that though it had tried alot by supporting BLA terrorists in Balochistan province of Pakistan/ other terrorists in Sindh province in the past and carried out terror attacks in Khyber Pukhtunkhwa in the 80s when Pakistan was busy in first Afghan war.

Even Pakistan was training Separatist of North-East on behalf of China before 1971. You reaped what you sowed.

You have no proof that India is supporting militants, they are the devil created by Pakistan for strategic depth in Afghanistan,now went against their creators.
 
. . .
Even Pakistan was training Separatist of North-East on behalf of China before 1971. You reaped what you sowed.

There had been no hand of Pakistan in Indian North East unrest. its on record that it was Indian own apathy towards NE which had worsened the situation there. Even link to Chinese involvment has weak conviction.

You have no proof that India is supporting militants, they are the devil created by Pakistan for strategic depth in Afghanistan,now went against their creators.

you do have a share though at a lowest level currently only pouring money. i was talking about Indian terrorism in KPK the then NWFP in the 80s and specially in Karachi city where you Indians are known for pushcart/motorcycle bombs.
 
. .
Invasion and occupation is different though.
 
.
I heard that India invaded Pakistan during 1971. If they did, how far?

They never did. It was a CIVIL WAR in EAST.Pakistan... which is Bangladesh now. Indians entered the war on the side of East Pakistanis...

Today's Pakistan, the main Pakistan, was called W.Pakistan and indians were always f*cked there.
 
.
There had been no hand of Pakistan in Indian North East unrest. its on record that it was Indian own apathy towards NE which had worsened the situation there. Even link to Chinese involvment has weak conviction.



you do have a share though at a lowest level currently only pouring money. i was talking about Indian terrorism in KPK the then NWFP in the 80s and specially in Karachi city where you Indians are known for pushcart/motorcycle bombs.

Pakistan gave asylum and training to Mizo and other separatists. After Mujib came he initiated crackdown. Becoming proxy to China cost Pakistan half their country.

Can you explain this 80s things because in 80s you were fighting in Afghanistan.
 
.
I am not a supporter of war . However ,India can & will be able to survive a nuclear attack, what becomes of Pak. All water into Pak flows from India the fallout shall flow back into Pk.

Going to war will help Pak, it shall provide that nation with a platform for all fissiparous orgnisations to set aside their individual agendas and come together.

It may be a better option to up the ante thru other options and keep it up.


my Friend one doesn't build hundreds of nukes for a Hiroshima-Nagasaki type war but for a full fledged
"mutual assured destruction" India is 3.6 times the size of Pak so if it takes 20 nukes to wipe out Pakistan then 70-80 can do the same to India therefore your assertion of a nuclear strike is wrong if there will be a Indo-Pak nuclear war then rest assured it will be
"multiple strikes"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction

on topic : India is no "Israel" & Pakistan is no "Lebanon"
 
.
They never did. It was a CIVIL WAR in EAST.Pakistan... which is Bangladesh now. Indians entered the war on the side of East Pakistanis...

Today's Pakistan, the main Pakistan, was called W.Pakistan and indians were always f*cked there.

Like the Kargil and Siachin. :lol:
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom