Safriz
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2010
- Messages
- 20,845
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
The advisory is as clear as it can be.
Embassy of India in Moscow: "Thuraya Satphone Service is not permitted in India. Anyone using any prohibited telegraphic device, including Satphone, violates the existing laws and is liable to be penalized under the law.”
Advisory to Republic of Liberia's maritime authority: " It is intimated to all Shipping companies / Shipping agents that use of Thuraya, Irridum and other such Satellite is banned in Indian waters and seafarers should not us the same."
Embassy of India in Germany: "11.Satellite telephone services like Thuraya and Irridium are not permitted in India. Unauthorised use of satellite telephone services will be prosecuted under section 6 of Indian Wireless Act and section 20 of Indian Telegraph Act."
And similarly you can find advisories to every country. How much more clearer can it be? Also, as I said earlier on this thread, the culprits were fully aware of the illegality, since they dumped the phones into the water when they saw the ICG approaching them. Even their lawyers will have a hard time arguing that they were unaware of the law. Which by the way is no excuse, since 'Ignorantia juris non excusat '. Seafarers (or anybody else) are expected to know the laws governing their profession.
The argument is becoming circular...
The "Vagueness" s in definition of the law...
The wording bans "Use" of sat phones and one may think that "Carrying" the phones while on transit or a visit to India may be fine as long as they are not using the Equipment..
But if you read the actual law it also bans "Carrying" any satellite phone while on indian soil that includes indian airports and indian waters regardless of its being used or not..Even a switched off Satellite phone will land you in trouble..
thats why my stance that even the guidelines are vague and can land people in trouble.