shekh haseena's gift to Modi

[Shamain]

this is exactly what I was explaining to an Indian just in my post above. they have not only justified but celebrated those killings and strangely Hasina has chosen to look away from those incidents and thought it will give her more coverage and provide approval ratings in India if she refuses to meet the Pakistani players or shares 71 war memorabilia
her choice, her country and her people
who are we to judge?

Yes ,probably iwas writing my post when u had posted the comment before mine, so ihad missed it, otherwise iwudnt have repeated it.

 

[nForce]

Geography does not restrict two countries from reaching out to each other. If that were the case US wouldn't had been our largest trading partner.



You can name your arrogance whatever you like, frankly speaking no body in Pakistan gives a damn about Modi or Modi's India. The only time we hear is when there are talks about terrorism and Indian hand in it. Till now Pakistan was taking hits and continue to be blamed and bashed but now things are becoming different. I bet you haven't seen Pakistan this proactive and vocal about Indian sponsored terrorism inside Pakistan. SAARC countries are fully aware why Pakistan cannot and is hesitant where India is involved, this is also true vice versa. There wont be a SAARC without Pakistan, anything else would be a bilateral agreements between two countries and India cannot stop Pakistan for having that with any country. Russia has started opening up to Pakistan despite Indian annoyance and pressure. Do you believe the world resolves around Indian whims and wishes? Think again!

India is nowhere near that position where it could simply dictate terms to other countries in the region.

I think SAARC has lost its relevance. As @Horus was saying, Pakistan should try making friends in middle east and sever attachments with South Asia. We have this new BBIN thing going on.

 

[bongbang]

I understand that. I have no problem with you guys celebrating 1971. you guys had some genuine grievances and I have said many times about them. But what is this thing about sticking all the time in 1971

A simple apology will help

becoming a satellite state of India. Like an independent BD with no influence and interference from India is possible. Or isn't it? With Haseena sucking up to India for creation of BD is an embarrassment for both people who either fought for 1947 or 1971.

There is no vessel state. Its the mind orgasm of Pakistanis and Jamatis. Bangladesh story is they themselves fought for the country and Indians had supporting role. They dont show anyone before 1947 in bad light. Both 1947 and 1971 leaders are hero.

 

[Areesh]

A simple apology will help



There is no vessel state. Its the mind orgasm of Pakistanis and Jamatis. Bangladesh story is they themselves fought for the country and Indians had supporting role. They dont show anyone before 1947 in bad light. Both 1947 and 1971 leaders are hero.

Apology part was alread ydone by Musharraf.

As for if you think BD is not vessel state of India. Then great. Best of luck to your country.

 

[Sky lord]

I understand that. I have no problem with you guys celebrating 1971. you guys had some genuine grievances and I have said many times about them. But what is this thing about sticking all the time in 1971 and becoming a satellite state of India. Like an independent BD with no influence and interference from India is possible. Or isn't it? With Haseena sucking up to India for creation of BD is an embarrassment for both people who either fought for 1947 or 1971.

Probably similar reason to why you can't get past Kashmir.

 

[Areesh]

Probably similar reason to why you can't get past Kashmir.

There is a huge difference between Kashmir and 1971. But whatever floats your boat.

 

[Sky lord]

There is a huge difference between Kashmir and 1971. But whatever floats your boat.

Kashmir is an older dispute , 3 generations old and even more water under the bridge.

Sauce from the goose should be good enough for the gander.

And when did Pakistan ever sincerely apologize to. Bangladesh and own up to its mistakes ?

 

[Green Angel]

Why MODI don't take selfie with Hasina....

 

[Areesh]

Kashmir is an older dispute , 3 generations old and even more water under the bridge.

Sauce from the goose should be good enough for the gander.

And when did Pakistan ever sincerely apologize to. Bangladesh and own up to its mistakes ?

Kashmir is a living dispute and we are a party to it.

Musharraf apologized when he visited BD during his tenure.

 

[Shamain]

Well tho ido know any kind of idiocy can be expected from indians, but this whole statement that india brags abt and gloats over shamelessly for last 40 years that after ww11 itwas the biggest unilateral surrender etc etc whatevr nonsense is so wrong. The 90000 figure always quoted in itself was always wrong. The headcount of armymen was no more than 43000 ,rest of the people were west pakistani civil servants and civilians. How on earth that figure became surrender and largest surrender. I believe one day even hell will freeze over but indians wont even grow a pea sized brain.

There is no concept of country in Islam. Bangladesh wasnt a free country under Pakistan. We are well off now. There is peace and human ddevelopment


Dont think too much its dangerous

Bongadonga, Mach ka?

Apology part was alread ydone by Musharraf.

As for if you think BD is not vessel state of India. Then great. Best of luck to your country.

Why on earth shud pakistanis apologize to these idiiot bengalis and indians when figures quoted werent correct?? 3million, even bengalis laugh at the exggerated figure,is it even possible.
Aaj tak bangladesh nay kisi ko war crimes ki investigation hee nahi karnay dee keuu????

Did those inhumane bengalis and ******** apologized for killing west pakistanis before pak army had started military op in east pakistan?? Did they apologize for killing innocent men, women their kids,uni girls staying in hostels who were west pakistanis. Killing,maiming them??
Kisi nay aaj tak us bloodshed ki baat nahi ki.
Did u even hear abt the methods used thru which those west pakistanis kids were killed by terrorist india and bangladesh. U wish not to hear.

Did these shameless bengals ever admitted that after war was over these terrorist indian soldiers had molested bengalis own bengladeshi women?? Did they ever tell?

 

[Indus Falcon]

I am sorry for disappointing you
thee thing is Modi admires his BSF and that love is not lost if its deployed along Pakistan or Bangladesh.
only difference is that on Pakistani side BSF has to earn its money and gets shot back where as on the Bangladeshi side its chill out and relaxing shooting practice without any reaction.

Sir, we don't just shoot back anymore. We gift them 105mm's and then you should see them run with their tails between their legs.

 

[Mr.Nair]

lol thats what u think. In south asia curiously its the indian economy which is today 1.7 trillion out of 2.63 that u claim. And pakistan is not interested in india. The future natural resources and oil lies in the west of pakistan so why not? Also pakistan's own geographical location is very good and we can will transit to countries like we give to china who has just invested 46 billion in our country. And as far as resources r concern we have our own resources by which we can sustain by ourselves for the next 100-150 years. We are basically an indigenous country.

So i dont see any reason why we should not say goodbye to south asia for long term future.

Indian economy is 2.3 trillion as per imf 2015 and not 1.7 dollars

Economy of India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Bang Galore]

Geography does not restrict two countries from reaching out to each other. If that were the case US wouldn't had been our largest trading partner.

There is a difference between a land locked country & one separated just by an ocean though distance does play a part even there. What was being spoken here was about trade & transit, not diplomatic relations. Your ability to do trade with Nepal & Bhutan is severely limited as is your usefulness to those countries. Bangladesh is theoretically possible but that is now clearly a country that has chosen to prioritise relations with India.

You can name your arrogance whatever you like, frankly speaking no body in Pakistan gives a damn about Modi or Modi's India. The only time we hear is when there are talks about terrorism and Indian hand in it. Till now Pakistan was taking hits and continue to be blamed and bashed but now things are becoming different. I bet you haven't seen Pakistan this proactive and vocal about Indian sponsored terrorism inside Pakistan. SAARC countries are fully aware why Pakistan cannot and is hesitant where India is involved, this is also true vice versa. There wont be a SAARC without Pakistan, anything else would be a bilateral agreements between two countries and India cannot stop Pakistan for having that with any country. Russia has started opening up to Pakistan despite Indian annoyance and pressure. Do you believe the world resolves around Indian whims and wishes? Think again!

Actually this is a very good reason of why SAARC will not work, Pakistan cannot get past its obsession with India & has nothing to offer. no one is interested to hear your whining about India. There are both bilateral relations as well as groupings that are formed, what do you think BBIN is about?

As for Pakistan's accusation of terrorism against India, I have heard not one comment from a single 3rd party about their belief in that. Pakistan claims it has evidence but does not produce it. A bit like a child turning in a blank sheet after a painting class and when asked what it was to say the following :

A:It's a cow in a meadow.

Q: Where is the grass?
A: The cow has eaten it all up.

Q:Where is the cow then?
A: What will it do there after having eaten the grass, it has moved on elsewhere.....

That is pretty similar to Pakistan claims on evidence against India.

India is nowhere near that position where it could simply dictate terms to other countries in the region.

Nope. No term dictation, just mutual interest. All other SAARC countries have decided that their interests with India should not be vetoed on account of Pakistan's problems with India.

 

[Sky lord]

Kashmir is a living dispute and we are a party to it.

Musharraf apologized when he visited BD during his tenure.

Living dispute for Pakistanis , the rest of the world has moved on. Kashmir has been taken off the UN list of territorial disputes..it is no longer an issue, or were you not aware ?

All musharraf said was " both nations wounded " that is not enough, Why should it pain the aggressor? Bangladesh has still not received one penny in compensation nor have the Pak population left in Bangladesh been allowed to immigrate back to Pak.

Anyway pointless to talk to you, Pak holds on to grudges for ever but expects others to overlook its own bad behavior time and again.

 

[black-hawk_101]

BD might become a state of India. As they are moving towards India a lot.