What's new

Featured SHC declares constitution of sugar inquiry commission, its report illegal

ghazi52

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Messages
103,030
Reaction score
106
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
SHC declares constitution of sugar inquiry commission, its report illegal

Ishaq Tanoli
17 Aug 2020


5f3a59d255534.jpg


The written verdict was issued by a division bench headed by Justice K. K. Agha while hearing a set of petitions filed by sugar mils in Sindh. — PPI/File


The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday declared the constitution of the sugar inquiry commission — formed to probe the recent crisis of the commodity in the country — and its report illegal.

The court directed the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to conduct separate and independent investigations into the crisis.

The written verdict was issued by a division bench headed by Justice K. K. Agha while hearing a set of petitions filed by sugar mils in Sindh.

On June 23, Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills and around 19 other mills in the province had moved the SHC against the report of the inquiry commission and pleaded to quash the report.

The petitioners had contended that the commission was not constituted in accordance with the relevant law and included members who had already made up their minds against the sugar mills as they were also members of an earlier inquiry committee constituted for the same purpose.

In the written order issued today, the SHC listed eight reasons for quashing the report, including the "failure to follow mandatory rules of business" and "the failure to gazette the notification of the commission within due time".

The court stated that the commission's constitution was "incomplete", "biased" and denied the petitioners the opportunity to be heard.

The SHC also noted the "prejudice caused to the petitioners by the report, the action plan and letters which were sent by the adviser on accountability and interior to various statutory bodies and violation and interference in the relevant schemes of law and the Constitution by the executive".

"We hereby declare the impugned notification of March 16, 2020 and the impugned report of May 21, 2020 and all subsequent and consequent orders of the respondents [...] to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect, with regard to the petitioners, and quash the impugned report and all such actions and orders."

The SHC also stopped the federal government and all other government departments from directly or indirectly taking any action based on the findings of the report.

The court directed the NAB chairman to open an independent inquiry under the National Accountability Ordinance (NAO) to determine if any acts of corruption had been committed by any of the petitioners, without the reference of the report.

Further, it asked the FBR chairman to open an independent inquiry in accordance with the relevant tax laws to determine whether any "illegality" had been committed by any of the petitioners, without the reference of the report.

Similarly, the high court asked the director of the FIA to also conduct an independent inquiry under the Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 to determine if money laundering had been committed by any of the petitioners, without the reference of the report.

It also directed the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP), the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) and the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) to "fulfil their respective mandates in accordance with the law, with respect to the petitioners and the sugar industry".

The court also directed that copies of the order be forwarded to the NAB chairman, the FBR chairman, the FIA director general, the CCP chairman, the SECP chairman, the SBP governor and the Sindh chief secretary.

Meanwhile, Attorney General Khalid Jawed Khan said that the government will approach the Supreme Court against the high court's judgement.


Govt orders formal investigations against 'sugar cartel'

On July 28, the federal government had ordered the relevant departments to launch formal investigations in light of the report and where necessary take "penal, corrective and mitigating measures" against the "sugar cartel" implicated in the commission's report.

Adviser to the Prime Minister on Accountability and Interior Shahzad Akbar had written letters to CCP, Sindh chief secretary, Punjab chief secretary, SBP, FIA, SECP and FBR to "undertake a comprehensive investigation" into the matter.

All recipients of the letters, barring the chief secretaries of Sindh and Punjab, were directed to wrap up the investigation and submit a report to the federal government within 90 days.


Sugar probe report


The sugar inquiry commission, which was headed by FIA chief Wajid Zia and included officials from other institutions, was set up on the orders of Prime Minister Imran Khan to investigate the reasons behind the soaring price and shortage of the commodity in the country.

The commission's report, which was made public by the government in April, exposed multiple wrongdoings within the sugar industry and implicated key government and opposition political figures, including PTI leader Jahangir Tareen, PML-Q MNA Moonis Elahi, federal minister Khusro Bakhtiar and PML-N President Shahbaz Sharif's son.

The report detailed how over the years sugar mill owners had manipulated the market to make windfall profits amounting to billions of rupees, shedding light on the nexus between these owners and various government officials that led to unregulated practises bypassing laws and often exploiting the farmers.

It also revealed how the ‘sugar cartel’ comprising 88 mills had cheated sugarcane growers and consumers at every step starting from the procurement of cane, production of sugar, sale in the local market and export, all of which led to price hike of sugar as well as billions of rupees of tax evasion.


https://www.dawn.com/news/1574918/s...f-sugar-inquiry-commission-its-report-illegal
 
.
The government intentionally botched it to help her financier.

What is with this government and failure to follow laws, sops and conventions. They cannot produce a simple notification without playing dirty politics with it.

Shameful !!
 
.
SHC declares constitution of sugar inquiry commission, its report illegal

Ishaq Tanoli
17 Aug 2020


5f3a59d255534.jpg


The written verdict was issued by a division bench headed by Justice K. K. Agha while hearing a set of petitions filed by sugar mils in Sindh. — PPI/File


The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday declared the constitution of the sugar inquiry commission — formed to probe the recent crisis of the commodity in the country — and its report illegal.

The court directed the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to conduct separate and independent investigations into the crisis.

The written verdict was issued by a division bench headed by Justice K. K. Agha while hearing a set of petitions filed by sugar mils in Sindh.

On June 23, Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills and around 19 other mills in the province had moved the SHC against the report of the inquiry commission and pleaded to quash the report.

The petitioners had contended that the commission was not constituted in accordance with the relevant law and included members who had already made up their minds against the sugar mills as they were also members of an earlier inquiry committee constituted for the same purpose.

In the written order issued today, the SHC listed eight reasons for quashing the report, including the "failure to follow mandatory rules of business" and "the failure to gazette the notification of the commission within due time".

The court stated that the commission's constitution was "incomplete", "biased" and denied the petitioners the opportunity to be heard.

The SHC also noted the "prejudice caused to the petitioners by the report, the action plan and letters which were sent by the adviser on accountability and interior to various statutory bodies and violation and interference in the relevant schemes of law and the Constitution by the executive".

"We hereby declare the impugned notification of March 16, 2020 and the impugned report of May 21, 2020 and all subsequent and consequent orders of the respondents [...] to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect, with regard to the petitioners, and quash the impugned report and all such actions and orders."

The SHC also stopped the federal government and all other government departments from directly or indirectly taking any action based on the findings of the report.

The court directed the NAB chairman to open an independent inquiry under the National Accountability Ordinance (NAO) to determine if any acts of corruption had been committed by any of the petitioners, without the reference of the report.

Further, it asked the FBR chairman to open an independent inquiry in accordance with the relevant tax laws to determine whether any "illegality" had been committed by any of the petitioners, without the reference of the report.

Similarly, the high court asked the director of the FIA to also conduct an independent inquiry under the Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 to determine if money laundering had been committed by any of the petitioners, without the reference of the report.

It also directed the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP), the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) and the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) to "fulfil their respective mandates in accordance with the law, with respect to the petitioners and the sugar industry".

The court also directed that copies of the order be forwarded to the NAB chairman, the FBR chairman, the FIA director general, the CCP chairman, the SECP chairman, the SBP governor and the Sindh chief secretary.

Meanwhile, Attorney General Khalid Jawed Khan said that the government will approach the Supreme Court against the high court's judgement.


Govt orders formal investigations against 'sugar cartel'

On July 28, the federal government had ordered the relevant departments to launch formal investigations in light of the report and where necessary take "penal, corrective and mitigating measures" against the "sugar cartel" implicated in the commission's report.

Adviser to the Prime Minister on Accountability and Interior Shahzad Akbar had written letters to CCP, Sindh chief secretary, Punjab chief secretary, SBP, FIA, SECP and FBR to "undertake a comprehensive investigation" into the matter.

All recipients of the letters, barring the chief secretaries of Sindh and Punjab, were directed to wrap up the investigation and submit a report to the federal government within 90 days.


Sugar probe report


The sugar inquiry commission, which was headed by FIA chief Wajid Zia and included officials from other institutions, was set up on the orders of Prime Minister Imran Khan to investigate the reasons behind the soaring price and shortage of the commodity in the country.

The commission's report, which was made public by the government in April, exposed multiple wrongdoings within the sugar industry and implicated key government and opposition political figures, including PTI leader Jahangir Tareen, PML-Q MNA Moonis Elahi, federal minister Khusro Bakhtiar and PML-N President Shahbaz Sharif's son.

The report detailed how over the years sugar mill owners had manipulated the market to make windfall profits amounting to billions of rupees, shedding light on the nexus between these owners and various government officials that led to unregulated practises bypassing laws and often exploiting the farmers.

It also revealed how the ‘sugar cartel’ comprising 88 mills had cheated sugarcane growers and consumers at every step starting from the procurement of cane, production of sugar, sale in the local market and export, all of which led to price hike of sugar as well as billions of rupees of tax evasion.


https://www.dawn.com/news/1574918/s...f-sugar-inquiry-commission-its-report-illegal

SHC at it again.
First they tried to stop the government from acting on the report.

Now even a kid knows whenever a solid evidence is brought forward as in case of this report, and the court can see no other way to help the corrupt. They do make these excuses.

In short this Zardari court meant ' HOW DARE AN INVESTIGATION WAS ORDERED AGAINST OUR PEOPLE '.

SHAMEFUL!!!
 
. . . .
IHC rejects sugar millers' plea against inquiry commission's report



ihc-rejects-sugar-millers-plea-against-inquiry-commission-s-report-1597754735-2748.jpg

https://nation.com.pk/NewsSource/inp

August 18, 2020

Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Tuesday rejected intra-court plea filed by association of sugar millers against report and constitution of the inquiry commission.

The IHC, while announcing verdict on the plea, upheld the earlier decision of Chief Justice Athar Minallah and allowed authorities to continue their action against people responsible for sugar crisis.

Two-member bench comprising Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb and Justice Lubna Saleem Pervaiz announced the reserved verdict. The court stated that constitution and report of commission, formed to identify those responsible for the sugar crisis, cannot be declared null and void merely on suspicion of technical issues.

On the other hand, Sindh High Court on Monday declared report of Sugar Inquiry Commission null and void.

SHC, while accepting plea of owners of sugar mills, ordered that government can launch inquiry against the mills but report of commission should not influence the investigation.

It is pertinent to mention here that Sugar inquiry commission had claimed that sugar mills belonging to the families of the country's top politicians including PML-N's Shehbaz Sharif, PTI's Jahangir Tareen and Khusro Bakhtiar,

PML-Q's Moonis Elahi and PPP's Asif Ali Zardari were among the beneficiaries of the crisis.

In its forensic report - issued on May 21 - the commission had accused the sugar mill owners of earning illegal profits to the tune of billions of rupees through unjustified price hikes, benami transactions, tax evasion, misuse of subsidy and purchasing sugarcane off the books.

To stop government action, owners of the mills approached Sindh High Court, which stopped the federal government from taking actions against the sugar mills owners.

Later, federal government approached Supreme Court (SC) to challenge order of Sindh High Court (SHC). SC dismissed the stay order granted by the SHC and allowed the government to take action against sugar mills.

The top court granted three-week time to the SHC to issue verdict over the matter. The SC also directed the government to not take unnecessary steps against sugar millers.
 
.
Supreme Court suspends SHC judgement declaring sugar commission, its report illegal

Hearing of the case has been adjourned for a month


Hasnaat Malik
September 02, 2020


A file photo of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. PHOTO: EXPRESS


A file photo of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. PHOTO: EXPRESS


ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) suspended on Wednesday the Sindh High Court's (SHC) judgement that declared the sugar inquiry commission and its report illegal.

A three-member special judge bench led by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Gulzar Ahmed also issued notices to the respondents over the federal government's petition.
The hearing of the case has been adjourned for a month.

Last week, Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) Khalid Javed Khan, on behalf of the federal government, filed a petition against the ruling on August 17. He stated that the SHC quashed the fact-finding report as well as the notifications for the inquiry commission under the Pakistan Commissions of Inquiry Act, 2017.
The government’s petition maintained that the SHC quashed the fact-finding report and the notifications on technical grounds, as the summary for constituting the commission was initiated by the interior ministry rather than the Cabinet Division. The petition further stated that the notifications were published belatedly in the official gazette.

This was despite the fact that the summary for appointing all seven members of the commission was duly approved by the federal cabinet and none of the sugar manufacturers, including the respondents, ever did or could claim lack of knowledge of the proceedings of the commission.
The petition further maintained that the commission also fully interacted with the Pakistan Sugar Mills Association (PSMA), of which the respondent manufacturers were members. They could not show any prejudice whatsoever owing to the fact that the summary was initiated by the Interior Division, which in any case merged in the final approval of the cabinet, nor due to any delay in the publication of the notification in the gazette, the petition upheld.


“It is submitted with profound respect and humility that the bench grossly erred in law and facts and based the judgement on the completely unjustified assumption that the aggrieved party, in this case, is the group of manufacturers of sugar,” the petition said.
In a surprising move, the Sindh High Court had on August 17 quashed the sugar inquiry commission's report declaring it illegal.

A two-judge SHC bench led by Justice KK Agha announced the judgement , stating that the notification regarding the constitution of sugar commission was illegal.

The decision was, however, not to prevent authorities including the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) and Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) from proceeding against sugar mill owners in accordance with law, and without any reference to or reliance on the report.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom