Mav3rick
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2008
- Messages
- 6,946
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Not required since CAG does the audit every year and submits it in parliament.
Basically, still plenty of time to report a crash due to malfunction.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not required since CAG does the audit every year and submits it in parliament.
End of the day, it was "NOT SUNK", it "SANK".End of the day it was Sunk, was it not ? Does it matter how ?
https://defencelover.in/indian-navy-veteran-reveals-brilliant-plan-sink-pns-ghazi/
Which Foreign minister said that ?
Italian journalist said 170 killed, rest being treated in Army hospital.
I would rather trust my govt. than yours.
CAG is one of the most reliable institutions in India. Almost all the scams you hear about have been exposed by CAG.
Should rephrase that to how many operational aircraft does the IAF have.
Likewise, what's PN's submarine strength now.
End of the day, it was "NOT SUNK", it "SANK".
But you being, who you are will not understand the difference.
Basically, still plenty of time to report a crash due to malfunction.
You won the war yet your Navy still needed to find solace in mythical claims. Imagine if you had lost the war like nowYour lost half the country and the Submarine, and yet you "win" ?
Indian foreign minister said that. One Italian journalist said that who happens to be a writer for Indian news agencies as well and has basically no journalistic footprint compared to major and reliable neutral sources such as RT, AJ, BBC, etc. I'm not asking you to trust "my" government I'm asking if you're blindly trusting yours and why you're ignoring neutral assessment.
CAG can be reliable to you I'm talking about neutrality. Worry not truth will come out, and with evidence.
You won the war yet your Navy still needed to find solace in mythical claims. Imagine if you had lost the war like now
Personally I don't know but again it proves our point that it is much easier for the IAF to hide operational losses since you have not provided any independent source. The onus of whose providing is on youSo how many operational aircrafts does IAF have ?
Personally I don't know but again it proves our point that it is much easier for the IAF to hide operational losses since you have not provided any independent source. The onus of whose providing is on you
Lol now you are claiming the submarine. The submarine was laying mines around the Indian coast and got hit by it's own mine.Or you think such coincidence are normal
Provide proof that Indian foreign minister said that.
Italian journalist is a neutral source in my book.
https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201903011072868518-indian-mig-shot-down-pak-f16/
I am confident its just a matter of time before the truth comes out. Same as osama :wink:
Historically India has not hidden its losses. Like we declare losses at the LOC in real time while Pakistan Army does not officially declare most of the time, " to preserve the morale of the forces".Personally I don't know but again it proves our point that it is much easier for the IAF to hide operational losses since you have not provided any independent source. The onus of whose providing is on you
The aircraft went down in Indian Occupied Kashmir. A region were Indian forces have mastered the art of hiding their war crimes. Hiding the loss of one aircraft means nothingAF will find it IMPOSSIBLE to hide losses
The aircraft went down in Indian Occupied Kashmir. A region were Indian forces have mastered the art of hiding their war crimes. Hiding the loss of one aircraft means nothing
Are you conducting a survey or something.So how many operational aircrafts does IAF have ?
All the claims you are making are found only in Indian media. All truly independent media sources have completely distanced themselves of India's mythical claims. The episode of 27th has forever changed my view of the Indian media. It sometimes puts conspiracy theory websites to shame. For God's sake try to get your news from news from sources other than .inFor a moment, see the incident from a neutral viewpoint and you shall see the light