Thorough Pro
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2008
- Messages
- 13,232
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
2450 km specifically for nuclear launch pads in Andaman and nicobar
Shaheen 3 true range
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shaheen 3 true range
First time I have seen an Indian want to fight, I have only seen them run or get beats.Please ask. Be brave.
Darna nahin hai. Ladna hai.
Cheers, Doc
First time I have seen an Indian want to fight, I have only seen them run or get beats.
You can tell a lot with the size and shape of engine output. Fuel used, thrust output and so on. Pakistan need to develop supercomputer to crunch and see the possibilities / capabilities of material science. Otherwise Pakistan won’t see much advancements in missile technology, same can shaped round missiles and solid fuel smoke.I am sorry to state this but the fact that most of our missiles have stabilization fins and that too no grid fins, speaks to the generation of our rocket engines. I would like to see our top class missiles operate with rocket motors and internal gyroscopic stabilizers that are advanced enough to not warrant such WWII (Scud-type) technologies.
2450 km specifically for nuclear launch pads in Andaman and nicobar
If your statement is true kashmir & Siachin would be part of Pakistan.
Go easy on whatever you're smokingDo you mean 2450 to Anamana and Nicobar and from where?
If you think Pakistan wants only Kashmir you are deluded.. What stragetic value does it hold. Pakistan has already taken Gilgat and Azad Kashmir from you to cut you off from central Asia but JK is not that valuable but what lays beyond that has always been the game it is not Kashmir and never was but to restore the legacy of Ghor
Go easy on whatever you're smoking
Do Pak have an SSBN program ?
No we don't need itDo Pak have an SSBN program ?
These stabilization fund are for greater accuracy' ànd what's the benefits of grid fins, please explain it bro?? ONLY one tactical ballistic missile had a grid fin that's was Soviet toucka, which was retired long agoI am sorry to state this but the fact that most of our missiles have stabilization fins and that too no grid fins, speaks to the generation of our rocket engines. I would like to see our top class missiles operate with rocket motors and internal gyroscopic stabilizers that are advanced enough to not warrant such WWII (Scud-type) technologies.
I agree grid fins have limited utility for missiles of these classes. My only point was to state that even within the fin world grid fins are the newer iterations. I would prefer no fins. The point stays that our missile have old tech like fins that have over the years been phased out my most countries who develop modern missiles.No we don't need it
These stabilization fund are for greater accuracy' ànd what's the benefits of grid fins, please explain it bro?? ONLY one tactical ballistic missile had a grid fin that's was Soviet toucka, which was retired long ago
i think we still not using TVC on our BMs that's why our BMs used STABILIZATION FINS to correct their trajectories in early flightI agree grid fins have limited utility for missiles of these classes. My only point was to state that even within the fin world grid fins are the newer iterations. I would prefer no fins. The point stays that our missile have old tech like fins that have over the years been phased out my most countries who develop modern missiles.
i think we still not using TVC on our BMs that's why our BMs used STABILIZATION FINS to correct their trajectories in early flight
i know far better than you and what you're trying to say, i didn't understandYou know some parts of the missiles but not entirely but it was a decent out-put this time around