'Shadinota' Class corvette news and discussion.

[Nike]

Show me a scientific article or research paper which states this - that you have boldly claimed.
''Ships with 3500 ton displacement are inappropriate for littoral warfare period.''
You have based your entire argument on this ridiculous statement,which if taken as true along with your'e second statement ''almost all future naval conflicts will be played out in the continental shelf or littoral areas. I am afraid you don't get it'',means that all the big naval planners of the world don't get it but somehow you do.Without even any research or professional experience to speak of.Who is the joker here?As for USN it has now cancelled LCS programme as a failure,will build no more and has replaced it with 4000 tonne frigate programme.But ofc u know better than usn,because oh wait mighty bangladeshi navy has a few small junk ships nobody gives a damn about.

Well, in Gulf War Lynx ASW helicopter perform wonder by destroying many small vessels of Iraq Navy using their sea skua missiles. In age of network centric warfare most of littoral operation against small and agile vessels mostly will be done using aircraft or helicopter guided by larger vessels who had good radar, sonar and other Navigation systems.

Back to Sandhinota class

This vessels is at best become surface warfare patrol corvettes. No ASW equipment at all, not even hull mounted sonar, and rack for CAPTAS, and triple mounted torps launcher.

 

[Bilal9]

Thank you for realising at last the guy is a moron.

He actually thinks that the Indian Navy would have any chance when China starts sending it's CBVG's into the Indian Ocean next decade.

What I found amazing is that not only does this guy NOT understand the premise of basic naval warfare, he demeans anyone presenting a counterpoint. People will have differing viewpoints - that's a given, but this guy has no credibility when he disrespects other people's viewpoints without stating why (or even presents no sources or proof to back up his own). I am free from his future 'viewpoints' at least.

One thing I always wonder about is why someone would take the trouble to 'invade' India....

 

[Flynn Swagmire]

But ofc u know better than usn,because oh wait mighty bangladeshi navy has a few small junk ships nobody gives a damn about.

Sir, its Ramadan! Else, I would have talked some sweet words about your suppa pawwa 2012 country too.

Anyway, peoples will have different opinion. Its nature...

 

[AUSTERLITZ]

You have shot your credibility right in the foot with a statement like 'oh wait mighty Bangladeshi navy has a few small junk ships nobody gives a damn about'.

How are YOU a 'add water - get instant expert' and I am not? Some demeaning attitude!

Tell us how you became a think tank analyst with this type of attitude and immaturity. In hindsight it now seems correct that @Genesis gave up talking to you and I have wasted my time as well writing long posts.

You have earned a place in my ignore list. Good day.

Very simple,you make ludicrously bold claims.Have no scientific research or professional opinion articles to back it up,you think you know better than the world's naval planners.No one can take you seriously,if you have the guts - show articles to back up your claim.
I only made demeaning statement about bangladeshi navy because you try to bring up bangladeshi navy and littoral waters in every post despite the fact that BN is not an enemy of india nor is it a threat.So why should we care?And yes calling it junk might be harsh,but its the truth.

 

[gslv mk3]

What "strong" indigenous aviation and naval Industry does India have

Is this a joke ?