Senior Israeli archaeologist casts doubt on Jewish heritage of Jerusalem

[Cherokee]

what real and substantial proof is there for existance of moses,jesus and muhammad.

What is proof of Existence of Ganesha , varaha , matsya etc ?? .

Moses , jesus and Mohammed are far more plausible then these .

Get the drift ??

Don't attract trolls to bash Hinduism .

 

[BeyondHeretic]

What this means is that , it does not belong to us and yet we are still here

 

[Alshawi1234]

Academically speaking, there are enough evidence to SUPPORT that it did exist through archeology, friendly and hostile sources.

Our problem is, how can some random people who CLAIM to be Jewish come and try to "reclaim" a state which the Jews lived in 2000 years who. The majority of Jewish-Israel's today cannot trace their ancestry to the natives of ancient Israel, aka Zion.

They get slaughtered in Europe, and take their revenge on the Palestinians.

 

[BeyondHeretic]

Academically speaking, there are enough evidence to SUPPORT that it did exist through archeology, friendly and hostile sources.

Our problem is, how can some random people who CLAIM to be Jewish come and try to "reclaim" a state which the Jews lived in 2000 years who. The majority of Jewish-Israel's today cannot trace their ancestry to the natives of ancient Israel, aka Zion.

They get slaughtered in Europe, and take their revenge on the Palestinians.

True , the creation of israel is similar to the story of liberia in africa , they didn't get slaughtered in europe but the europeans created israel so that one day all jews might god willing return to israel , not knowing the wont

 

[KingMamba]

what real and substantial proof is there for existance of moses,jesus and muhammad.

Prophet Muhammad pbuh body is in ksa you dunce, Jesus pbuh was recorded in roman accounts which had nothing to do with christianity at the time and even Jews say he existed they just dont follow him. As for moses it slips my mind but I am sure there is something for him as well, since cherokee already told you off I will restrain myself from anything further. Take a hike

 

[punit]

What is proof of Existence of Ganesha , varaha , matsya etc ?? .

Moses , jesus and Mohammed are far more plausible then these .

Get the drift ??

Don't attract trolls to bash Hinduism .

diff is for us the fig are mythical and symbolical in nature. While abrahmic religion considers their's to be of flesh and blood.

 

[INDIC]

What a funny thread. People are even disputing well-documented history of Jews.

 

[punit]

Prophet Muhammad pbuh body is in ksa you dunce, Jesus pbuh was recorded in roman accounts which had nothing to do with christianity at the time and even Jews say he existed they just dont follow him. As for moses it slips my mind but I am sure there is something for him as well, since cherokee already told you off I will restrain myself from anything further. Take a hike

dont explode urself in anger. Chill. Religion and their stories should be taken with bucket of salts. So those askng for archeological proof may also ask for letter of contract given by god(?) to his prophet/avatars else why should one accept their claims of being prophet/avatars

 

[Hack-Hook]

Jews do have a heritage in Jerusalem, that is not in doubt. If someone does not believe their stories they can just refer themselves to Roman accounts of their wars. Romans had no reason to make things up. Besides their heritage is not the real problem here, the problem was the fake Jews of Europe as many have pointed out.

Oh yeah and Solomon's temple did exist once and Al Aqsa was built on its former location, so that is why they cannot find ruins. Although I read somewhere they were digging under the mosque, don't know how much truth is in that.

well ,there is no evidence of Al-Aqsa mosque was built over a temple , but there is evidence of it were built over the ruins of another mosque .

The mosque was originally a small prayer house built by the Rashidun caliph Umar, but was rebuilt and expanded by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik and finished by his son al-Walid in 705 CE. After an earthquake in 746, the mosque was completely destroyed and rebuilt by the Abbasid caliph al-Mansur in 754, and again rebuilt by his successor al-Mahdi in 780. Another earthquake destroyed most of al-Aqsa in 1033, but two years later the Fatimid caliph Ali az-Zahir built another mosque which has stood to the present-day.

you can dig there as much as you like the only thing you will find is remains of several other mosque. no temple at all

By the way , before those times there is only evidence of a church there that was destroyed even before Islam in the wars of Persians and Roman

 

[KingMamba]

well ,there is no evidence of Al-Aqsa mosque was built over a temple , but there is evidence of it were built over the ruins of another mosque .


you can dig there as much as you like the only thing you will find is remains of several other mosque. no temple at all

By the way , before those times there is only evidence of a church there that was destroyed even before Islam in the wars of Persians and Roman

Actually I misspoke, it was rather the temple mount and not the mosque itself. When Caliph Umar captured Jerusalem he went searching for the spot from where Prophet Muhammad PBUH made the hijrah and had a man who was a Jewish convert along with him. So when they came to the spot that is where the temple mount was built, and that is why some orthodox Jews want to tear down the temple mount of recreate solomons temple there. However when Caliph Umar made the temple mount there was nothing on the spot at all.