What's new

Security agencies see RAW-NDS nexus behind terror acts

Yeah Sure Kid I Know Better things In diplomacy than you.If Pakistan even tried to even fart in general Population of India

you can say CPEC goodby Forever Not even china will give support then Pakistan
And you will never get to dubai and Iran Qatar and Kuwait by sea... do you get my point...b... If You Want I Can Send You the map..
 
.
And you will never get to dubai and Iran Qatar and Kuwait by sea... do you get my point...b... If You Want I Can Send You the map..
I am sorry , i hate to get involved while children play but i can not resist.
What exactly can stop us from going to the aforementioned ports?:)
 
. .
I wont blame them,thats what was being fed to them all these days.
But think with an open mind.even if we both agree for a second that RAW was involved.
Touch your heart and tell me..
With more money to spend and more recrusts in Pakistan or as you say in Afghanistan to recruit than IsI can get in India,who will suffer more.

Or even if we take both the agencies have equal resources in each others countries.look at the size difference.if we bomb each other inch by inch.by the time you destroy 20 % of India,Pakistan will be bombed 100% just bbecause of the size difference.or even with population wise it will be the same.

Pakistan has to deside if it wants peace and prosperity ,proxis will not bring peace the sooner your establishment understands the better.


You Better Watch It The Fault Lines In Your Country Are So Much That If We Started Indian Will Descend Into Never Ending Chaos.It Is Easier To Find Valuable Proxies in India Than It Is To Find In Pakistan
 
. .
I am older then you my dear but i digress , what are you going to block the route with?
All we need to do is blo
Point 5353 haha India already Nullified it by capturing 3 Post surrounding 5240, 4251 and 4875 :rofl::rofl::rofl: It.Ponit 5353 was captured by india in 1971 Pakistan only recaptured it in 1999 Loosing 3 other subsequent post
You cannot even Point this peak on MAP Let alone in reality gawaar :lol::lol::lol:
"5353 is the point over which the LoC goes"
"Fact is, our troops had never occupied that"


The argument that Point 5353 was never held by India has been regularly used by the Army public relations apparatus to rebut the charge that operational incompetence and strategic errors led to its occupation by Pakistan during the Kargil war. The claim is, in fact, true. India did not hold Point 5353 before the war broke out. What has not been reported widely is that this statement of fact rebuts nothing, for no one ever claimed that the peak was physically held by India before the war. Indeed, reports that appeared in Frontline and Business Line made quite clear that the peak was not held by either side in the build-up to the conflict.:enjoy::enjoy::lol::lol:
http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1720/17200340.htm
Uhoh, he's posting tabloids again. Listen little child, until 1999, 5353 was always with indus 8. Those little hills you mentioned are tiny compared to this one, your own generals said that 5353 was the king peak but at the end of the 1999 war, india had to settle for the handouts of those tiny hills you are so vainly proud of. :lol:
 
.
Point 5353 haha India already Nullified it by capturing 3 Post surrounding 5240, 4251 and 4875 :rofl::rofl::rofl: It.

Point 5353 was captured by India in 1971 Pakistan only recaptured it in 1999 Loosing 3 other subsequent post
You cannot even Point this peak on MAP Let alone in reality gawaar :lol::lol::lol:
"5353 is the point over which the LoC goes"
"Fact is, our troops had never occupied that"


The argument that Point 5353 was never held by India has been regularly used by the Army public relations apparatus to rebut the charge that operational incompetence and strategic errors led to its occupation by Pakistan during the Kargil war. The claim is, in fact, true. India did not hold Point 5353 before the war broke out. What has not been reported widely is that this statement of fact rebuts nothing, for no one ever claimed that the peak was physically held by India before the war. Indeed, reports that appeared in Frontline and Business Line made quite clear that the peak was not held by either side in the build-up to the conflict.:enjoy::enjoy::lol::lol:
http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1720/17200340.htm


Mean while
Over 4,000 soldiers killed in Kargil: Sharif:lol::lol::D

http://www.thehindu.com/2003/08/17/stories/2003081702900800.htm


Awww You Are So Cute

No one appeared to be in any doubt about just where Point 5353 was during the Kargil war itself. The Press Trust of India (PTI) put out official responses to Pakistan claims that Point 5353 was on its side of the LoC on July 28, 1999. "The maps signed by the Indian and Pakistani DGMOs (Directors General of Military Operations) in 1972 clearly indicate that it belongs to India," the PTI despatch noted. On July 30, a PTI depatch repeated the assertion in a report on fighting around Point 5353: "In this se ctor, Pakistan claims some mountains to be a part of this territory whereas the maps signed between the Directors General of Military Operations in December 1972, are contrary to this claim."


http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1720/17200340.htm

 
.
Sea blockage kid...did not notice when your sub was kicked out....and under sea test by pak
Sea b
I am older then you my dear but i digress , what are you going to block the route with?
Accept my apologies if I disrespect your elderly .. if someone try to destroyed cepec or hurt Pakistan or Pakistani people ..then we will do what is need to be done... we have every right to protect our motherland.even now Europeans are convince what India is try to do is full time nonsense
 
.

He was Politician he was Not even Know were to Point 5353 on Map In fact 14 corps captured Point 5070 during 2003 Op Prakram
It is amusing to see point 5353 come up. Neither Indian nor Pakistani Governments are worrying about it. Know why?

1. Because it was exchanged. India got naughty and occupied 6 peaks on and across the LoC. 3 of them surrounding 5353, peak 5240 and 2 other peaks. Pakistan had two peaks inside Indian territory but cut off. Had Pakistan stayed, those two peaks along with the battalion occupying it(there were roughly 3 companies atop two peaks along with artillery) would have been neutralized.

2. So India and Pakistan exchanged the peaks for Peace. India got back all peaks it had before and Pakistan went back. Point 5353 being on the line was not to be occupied by either side.
But there are troops of both sides that regularly meet unofficially.

3. Besides 5353 is a concave enclave - which means, it is surrounded on all sides by Indian peaks. So holding on to 5353 by Pakistan is itself extremely embarrassing.5240, 4251 and 4875

4. Some Indian generals were not happy about this 'unjust' settlement and criticized the HQ for giving into 'politics' calling it a political 'defeat'.

5. Some trolls here picked up this word - 'defeat' and extended it to the entire operation and made a complete fool of themselves.

2842sy.jpg
 
.
every attack in blamed on raw, but pak never provides evidence.

this is getting boring now
 
. . .
BS Pakistan is never hit any indian city after 26/11 even after countless attacks APS to bacha khan university even when Rawalpindi GHQ is targeted do you know why ?? ASK ISI

That Is Because ISI Found A Much Better Way To Screw Indian National Security

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...ingh-isi-pakistan-punjab-police/1/351403.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahom...-Army-plan-leaked-Pakistan-year-ISI-mole.html

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...rested-for-espionage/articleshow/39846897.cms

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...s-ISI-reach-in-India/articleshow/50373496.cms

He was Politician he was Not even Know were to Point 5353 on Map In fact 14 corps captured Point 5070 during 2003 Op Prakram
It is amusing to see point 5353 come up. Neither Indian nor Pakistani Governments are worrying about it. Know why?

1. Because it was exchanged. India got naughty and occupied 6 peaks on and across the LoC. 3 of them surrounding 5353, peak 5240 and 2 other peaks. Pakistan had two peaks inside Indian territory but cut off. Had Pakistan stayed, those two peaks along with the battalion occupying it(there were roughly 3 companies atop two peaks along with artillery) would have been neutralized.

2. So India and Pakistan exchanged the peaks for Peace. India got back all peaks it had before and Pakistan went back. Point 5353 being on the line was not to be occupied by either side.
But there are troops of both sides that regularly meet unofficially.

3. Besides 5353 is a concave enclave - which means, it is surrounded on all sides by Indian peaks. So holding on to 5353 by Pakistan is itself extremely embarrassing.5240, 4251 and 4875

4. Some Indian generals were not happy about this 'unjust' settlement and criticized the HQ for giving into 'politics' calling it a political 'defeat'.

5. Some trolls here picked up this word - 'defeat' and extended it to the entire operation and made a complete fool of themselves.

2842sy.jpg


Wow First You Proudly Say You Won Kargil And When We Expose Your Fake Claims Now You Start Coming Up With Stupid Excuses:disagree::disagree::disagree::rofl::rofl::rofl:

every attack in blamed on raw, but pak never provides evidence.

this is getting boring now



 
. .
All we need to do is blo

Uhoh, he's posting tabloids again. Listen little child, until 1999, 5353 was always with indus 8. Those little hills you mentioned are tiny compared to this one, your own generals said that 5353 was the king peak but at the end of the 1999 war, india had to settle for the handouts of those tiny hills you are so vainly proud of. :lol:
Do elaborate what exactly do you want to "blo" and how are you going to achive it?

All we need to do is blo

Uhoh, he's posting tabloids again. Listen little child, until 1999, 5353 was always with indus 8. Those little hills you mentioned are tiny compared to this one, your own generals said that 5353 was the king peak but at the end of the 1999 war, india had to settle for the handouts of those tiny hills you are so vainly proud of. :lol:
Do elaborate what exactly do you want to "blo" and how are you going to achieve it?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom