Scientific evidence that Hindu civilization is more than 15,000 years old

[Shankranthi]

I for a fact know that most rivers of the world are explicitly mentioned in the Vedas.

Belief comes in when you say that it has remained unadulterated for 15000 years. Logic dictates otherwise

And your "facts" would be wrong.

All of the rivers mentioned in the Vedas flow in India and some in pakistan.

 

[El Sidd]

And your "facts" would be wrong.

All of the rivers mentioned in the Vedas flow in India and some in pakistan.

The river Danube and even Siberian rivers are mentioned in the Vedas.

Honey you should attend more classes before going international.

 

[Shankranthi]

I have a question.

If the concept of marriage comes from Abrahamic religion, then why Indians (Hindu people) do marriage?

Is marriage a human/social concept, or a divine religious concept?

Some person with well knowledge of anthropology or history can tell it.

lol. Are you really a bangladeshi ?

Rama married Sita.

And he was way before even abraham was born.

Better still all the rishis in the Vedas are married.

 

[untitled]

Yes. Sanskrit has remained unchanged because it cannot change. I

What is the Sansikirit word for a positron?

a divine religious concept?

Who was the first Prophet?

 

[Shankranthi]

The river Danube and even Siberian rivers are mentioned in the Vedas.

Honey you should attend more classes before going international.

This is a complete list of ALL rives mentioned in the Vedas,

Northwestern Rivers (western tributaries of the Indus):

• Trstama
• Susartu
• Anitabha (listed once, in 5.53.9, with the Afghan rivers Rasa (Avestan Rangha/Raŋhā), Kubha, Krumu, Sarayu (Avest. Harōiiu)
• Rasa (on the upper Indus) (often a mythical river, Avestan Rangha, Scythian Rha)
• Svetya (Gilgit)
• Kubha (Kabul), Greek Kophēn
• Krumu (Kurrum)
• Mehatnu (along with the Gomati and Krumu)
• Suvastu (Swat)
• Gauri (Panjkora)
• Kusava (Kunar)

The Indus and its minor eastern tributaries:

• Sindhu (Indus)Sushoma (Sohan)
• Arjikiya (Haro)

Central Rivers (rivers of the Punjab):

• Vitasta (Jhelum)
• Asikni (Chenab)
• Parusni (Ravi)
• Vipas (Beas)
• Sutudri (Sutlej)
• Marudvrdha

East-central Rivers (rivers of Haryana):

• Sarasvati
• Drsadvati, Apaya (RV 3.23.4, Mahabharata Apaga.)

Eastern Rivers:

• Asmanvati (Assan)
• Yamuna
• Ganga
• Sarayu in Uttar Pradesh
• Gomati or Adi Ganga in Uttar Pradesh (Gomti)
• Gandaki
• Silamavati
• Urnavati
• Yavyavati (Zhob river)

THIS is the Map of those rivers,

Plenty of Russian Rivers have Sanskrit / Hindu names, but they are not mentioned int he Vedas.

E.g.

1. River Sita
2. River Moksha
3. River Maya
4. River Kuma
5. River Ravan
6. River Shiva
7. Rive Upa

etc.

It only points to its Hindu past, not the origin of Vedas in russia.

 

[El Sidd]

This is a complete list of ALL rives mentioned in the Vedas,

Northwestern Rivers (western tributaries of the Indus):

• Trstama
• Susartu
• Anitabha (listed once, in 5.53.9, with the Afghan rivers Rasa (Avestan Rangha/Raŋhā), Kubha, Krumu, Sarayu (Avest. Harōiiu)
• Rasa (on the upper Indus) (often a mythical river, Avestan Rangha, Scythian Rha)
• Svetya (Gilgit)
• Kubha (Kabul), Greek Kophēn
• Krumu (Kurrum)
• Mehatnu (along with the Gomati and Krumu)
• Suvastu (Swat)
• Gauri (Panjkora)
• Kusava (Kunar)

The Indus and its minor eastern tributaries:

• Sindhu (Indus)Sushoma (Sohan)
• Arjikiya (Haro)

Central Rivers (rivers of the Punjab):

• Vitasta (Jhelum)
• Asikni (Chenab)
• Parusni (Ravi)
• Vipas (Beas)
• Sutudri (Sutlej)
• Marudvrdha

East-central Rivers (rivers of Haryana):

• Sarasvati
• Drsadvati, Apaya (RV 3.23.4, Mahabharata Apaga.)

Eastern Rivers:

• Asmanvati (Assan)
• Yamuna
• Ganga
• Sarayu in Uttar Pradesh
• Gomati or Adi Ganga in Uttar Pradesh (Gomti)
• Gandaki
• Silamavati
• Urnavati
• Yavyavati (Zhob river)

THIS is the Map of those rivers,

Plenty of Russian Rivers have Sanskrit / Hindu names, but they are not mentioned int he Vedas.

E.g.

1. River Sita
2. River Moksha
3. River Maya
4. River Kuma
5. River Ravan
6. River Shiva
7. Rive Upa

etc.

It only points to its Hindu past, not the origin of Vedas in russia.

Ok i was wrong.

You are right.

 

[Srinivas]

The Surya Siddhanta describes rules to calculate the motions of various planets and the moon relative to various constellations, diameters of various planets, and calculates the orbits of various astronomical bodies.[6][7] The text asserts, according to Markanday and Srivatsava, that the earth is of a spherical shape.[5] It treats earth as stationary globe around which sun orbits, and makes no mention of Uranus, Neptune or Pluto

Is that a FACT?

No in that case it would have been called bhu siddantha.

 

[Shankranthi]

What is the Sansikirit word for a positron?

I will make it better, the word "Atom" itself has come from the sanskrit word for the smallest particle known, "Anu".

It was proposed by Acharya Kanada born in Gujarat and he proposed his atomic theory in his book Vaisekia Sutra.

The same guy from who Newton copied his now three laws of Motion.

• वेगः निमित्तविशेषात कर्मणो जायते |
  Translation : Change of motion is due to impressed force.
  (The law stated that an object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.)
• वेगः निमित्तापेक्षात कर्मणो जायते नियतदिक क्रियाप्रबन्धहेतु |
  Translation : Change of motion is proportional to the impressed force and is in the direction of the force.
• वेगः संयोगविशेषविरोधी |
  Translation : Action and reaction are equal and opposite.

 

[Enigma SIG]

I will make it better, the word "Atom" itself has come from the sanskrit word for the smallest particle known, "Anu".

It was proposed by Acharya Kanada born in Gujarat and he proposed his atomic theory in his book Vaisekia Sutra.

The same guy from who Newton copied his now three laws of Motion.

• 
  
  
  • वेगः निमित्तविशेषात कर्मणो जायते |
    Translation : Change of motion is due to impressed force.
    (The law stated that an object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.)
  • वेगः निमित्तापेक्षात कर्मणो जायते नियतदिक क्रियाप्रबन्धहेतु |
    Translation : Change of motion is proportional to the impressed force and is in the direction of the force.
  • वेगः संयोगविशेषविरोधी |
    Translation : Action and reaction are equal and opposite.

Alright I just stopped reading the thread right there.
Any peer reviewed journals to back your "scientific" claims?

 

[AdeelMian]

Alright I just stopped reading the thread right there.
Any peer reviewed journals to back your "scientific" claims?

Yaaaar waise dunya ki ajeeb o ghareeb tareen kisam ki qom hia yeh yani k demaaagh ki M.... laga dy inho nay oye chhaity koi punga kero humaray sath hum nay tum ko maarna hai

 

[Shankranthi]

Alright I just stopped reading the thread right there.
Any peer reviewed journals to back your "scientific" claims?

Plenty, though I doubt you would have heard of them either.

These are the other books on the topic,

1. Ravanabhasya
2. Bharadvajavrtti
3. Padarthadharmasamgraha

Another peer review and commentary called the Dasapadarthasastra can be found only in chinese translation now.

Then there is Vyomavati , also Sridhara’s Nyayakandali,

Then there is Udayana’s Kiranavali (10th century) and Śrivatsa's Lilavati (11th century).

Then there is Sivaditya’s Saptapadarthi which also belongs to the same period.

Then we have Samkara Misra’s Upaskara on Vaiśeṣika Sutra which also an important work.


Which one would you like to Read ?

 

[Enigma SIG]

Plenty, though I doubt you would have heard of them either.
These are the other books on the topic,

1. Ravanabhasya
2. Bharadvajavrtti
3. Padarthadharmasamgraha

Another peer review and commentary called the Dasapadarthasastra can be found only in chinese translation now.
Then there is Vyomavati , also Sridhara’s Nyayakandali,
Then there is Udayana’s Kiranavali (10th century) and Śrivatsa's Lilavati (11th century).
Then there is Sivaditya’s Saptapadarthi which also belongs to the same period.
Then we have Samkara Misra’s Upaskara on Vaiśeṣika Sutra which also an important work.
Which one would you like to Read ?

No I don't want to read "peer reviews/commentaries" or what you call them from the same source. Are there western commentaries accepting your POV?

 

[untitled]

I will make it better, the word "Atom" itself has come from the sanskrit word for the smallest particle known, "Anu".

Disagree. The words Anu and Atom have completely different etymologies

There is a reason I asked specifically asked about positron

 

[Shankranthi]

No I don't want to read "peer reviews/commentaries" or what you call them from the same source. Are there western commentaries accepting your POV?

lol..... how are these from the "same source" ? they are from different sources, written by his peers and other scholars of the ages.

His best peer review comes from Newton who plagiarized his work under the cover of colonialism

Disagree. The words Anu and Atom have completely different etymologies

There is reason I asked specifically asked about positron

Judge your yourself what is a positron,

In the Vaisesika Sutra there are nine classes of substances, some of which are non-atomic, some atomic, and others all-pervasive. The non-atomic ground is provided by the three substances of ether (akasa), space (dik), and time (kala), which are unitary and indestructible; a further four, earth (pṛthvi), water (apas), fire (tejas), and air (vayu) are atomic composed of indivisible, and indestructible atoms (aṇu); self or consciousness (atman), which is the eighth, is omnipresent and eternal; and, lastly, the ninth, is the mind (manas), which has atomic dimensions.

Let the basic atoms of pṛthivi, apas, tejas, and vayu be represented by P, Ap, T, and V, respectively. The eternality of the atoms is true only under normal conditions, and during creation and destruction, the atoms arise in a sequence starting with akasa and absorbed in the reverse sequence in the end of the world.

The sequence of evolution of the elements is given as V→T→Ap→P.

The V and T atoms are without mass, whereas P and Ap atoms have mass.

It is significant that consciousness is listed before mind, suggesting that it is the medium through which mind’s apprehensions are received. The atoms of earth, water, fire and air are different and this difference arises out of the different ways the fundamental atom of materiality combines with itself in different arrangements.

In other words, Kanada foresaw the emergence of chemistry from physics.

 

[untitled]

His best peer review comes from Newton who plagiarized his work under the cover of colonialism

Britain wasn't even a colonial power in his lifetime