Shankranthi
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2013
- Messages
- 2,586
- Reaction score
- -53
That's NOT TRUE according to Science and Facts.
Why Indians are so prolific at misappropriating credits for ancient achievements.
STOP being culture thieves.
https://www.indiatimes.com/news/ind...history-facts-that-will-shock-you-235071.html
Sanskrit Was First Spoken In Syria, Not India
https://daily.bhaskar.com/news/JM-MYTH-sanskrit-roots-syria-india-5351484-PHO.html
This Place Was The First To Record 'Sanskrit' And Not India!
https://scroll.in/article/737715/fa...irst-place-sanskrit-was-recorded-it-was-syria
Fact check: India wasn't the first place Sanskrit was recorded – it was Syria
.
1. The name "Syria" itself comes from the name of the Indian god of Sun "Surya".
2. Oldest books in Sanskrit are the Vedas, Ramayana and the Surya Siddhartha.
3. You only provide evidence that sanskrit was used in Syria and even Egypt and that is well known since the names of the king was "Dasaratha", same as the name of the king of Ayodhya and father of Rama. His daughter married the king of Egypt.
4. These are only the oldest surviving manuscripts in sanskrit. Ramayana OTOH gives details of Indian geography and is FAR FAR OLDER. I will provide the proof in the subsequent post.
I'm not arguing the content, I showed the origin of the texts is doubtful, most likely foreign sources translated locally.
To make that claim you need to prove that "foreign sources" existed before 15,000 years back.