What's new

SC judge urges Article 6 proceedings against President Alvi, Imran and others

Bhai SM kae elawa bi awaam haen.

As per the rigged 2018 elections, 70% of the electorate is represented in this Unity Govt.
If you are so sure then why need all the state machinery in bi elections? Also why do you need 14 parties mix achar to form the government? Why not go into elections and see how much awam is behind you.
Yeh chooran kahin or ja ker bacho.
 
Bhaijan Fauj bi buri, Adlia bi buri, siasatdan bi buray, awam bi khota khor, afsar bi kharaab etc etc. Koi rah gaya to baten add karleta hon. :enjoy:
So why kyn nikala by nawaz sharif on judges? then calling name of army,? then dirty video by maryam nawaz blakemail?

No one going to beleif on tabbar as i told you already.

Lohar court is the clear example.
 
So why kyn nikala by nawaz sharif on judges? then calling name of army,?
He was and still is right on that issue, never wanted to come to power now.
dirty video by maryam nawaz blakemail
The dirty videos are with ..... that blackmail judges.
No one going to beleif on tabbar as i told you already.
Dont need to convince your baradari.
Lohar court is the clear example.
It's abused as and when it suits PTI, not all the time.
 
He was and still is right on that issue, never wanted to come to power now.

The dirty videos are with ..... that blackmail judges.

Dont need to convince your baradari.

It's abused as and when it suits PTI, not all the time.
do one thing come pakistan ask people who is chor lol second lohar court is famous already

Pakistan ranks 130 out of 139 countries in adherence to rule of law (thenews.com.pk)
 
1657809186288.png



Replace G with L and voila... Perfect depiction of your Mian Khotta Shareef.
 
Says they violated sacred trust, played fraud on constitution
View attachment 861731
On July 13, the Supreme Court of Pakistan issued the detailed verdict of the suo moto case regarding the rejection of the no-confidence motion against the then prime minister Imran Khan by the then Deputy Speaker Qasim Khan Suri.

The court declared the ruling passed by then deputy speaker Suri on April 3, 2022, to reject the vote of no-confidence, the subsequent actions of former prime minister Imran Khan and incumbent President Dr Arif Alvi as an infringement of the fundamental rights of the opposition parties and the public at large apart from overstepping jurisdictional bounds.

Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, who retired on Wednesday, urged the parliament to determine if the acts of President Arif Alvi, Imran Khan,, former NA speaker Asad Qaiser, former deputy speaker Suri and former federal law minister Fawad Chaudhry “attract Article 6 of the Constitution” for violating the sacred trust of exercising by derailing the process of the no-confidence motion pursued against Imran Khan.


“This sacred trust was violated amongst others by the President, PM, the Speaker, the Deputy Speaker and the Law Minister as the elected representatives of the people were prevented from voting on the resolution and for such blatant transgression of the Constitution there must be consequences and the law must take its course,” Justice Miankhel observed.

“Whether the stated acts attract Article 6 of the Constitution is also left open to be determined by the Parliamentarians as to whether they leave open the doors for such unconstitutional acts or take suitable measures to stop such like mess in future,” he added.

Justice Miankhel also noted that the acts from “rejection of resolution by the Deputy Speaker till the dissolution of National Assembly by the President were not performed in the ordinary course of business but the same were result of premeditation and deliberations in order to defeat the resolution of vote of no confidence while playing fraud on the Constitution.”

Similarly, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel observed that “the conduct of the Deputy Speaker is evident of the fact that he had already decided to reject the resolution” which was drafted before the start of the proceedings in the House.

He noted that the ruling that Suri gave was “with the name and designation of the Speaker National Assembly, Asad Qaiser, who was even not present in the House.”

Justice Mandokhel said that the ruling of the deputy speaker was pre-planned and deprived the Parliamentarians of their constitutional right for a vote of no confidence against the PM.

“The Deputy Speaker did not provide the right to reply the allegations leveled by the Federal Minister for Law and Parliamentary Affairs, which undermined the authority and sovereignty of the Parliament, and has lowered its dignity as well. His act was, therefore, not only beyond the mandate of the Constitution, but is also based on mala fide, which cannot be termed as procedural irregularity, rather it was an act, ultra vires the Constitution.”

It's not hard to be MAULA JATT every day, but the consequences are always dear.
View attachment 861743

Still, the world remembers the trial and judgment of ZA Bhutto's case. Just check the history for your 'foolish enlightenment'.

Go by the justice, most judges in Pakistan deserve to be tried under article. All 'Nazriya-E-Zaroorat', 'Nazriya-E-Khidmat', and 'Nazriya-E-Mafadaat' were/are the summersaults and products of this justice system in Pakistan.

I didn't see anyone talking about the implementation of article 6 when a 'k@nj@r' party attacked the SC or did any? Kindly enlighten the forum if there is any.

THOSE WHO LIVE BY FOOLISHNESS DIE BY THE FOOLISHNESS.
 
Replace G with L and voila
I was talking about IK, if L suits you I don't mind. :lol:

Still, the world remembers the trial and judgment of ZA Bhutto's case. Just check the history for your 'foolish enlightenment'.

Go by the justice, most judges in Pakistan deserve to be tried under article. All 'Nazriya-E-Zaroorat', 'Nazriya-E-Khidmat', and 'Nazriya-E-Mafadaat' were/are the summersaults and products of this justice system in Pakistan.

I didn't see anyone talking about the implementation of article 6 when a 'k@nj@r' party attacked the SC or did any? Kindly enlighten the forum if there is any.

THOSE WHO LIVE BY FOOLISHNESS DIE BY THE FOOLISHNESS.

Clouds of trouble hover over President Arif Alvi following Supreme Court’s verdict

PML-N Senator Dr Afnan UIIah Khan drafts resolution for impeachment
SAMAA WEB DESKabout 4 hours ago

<p>President of Pakistan Dr Arif Alvi. Photo: APP</p>

President of Pakistan Dr Arif Alvi. Photo: APP
Pakistan Muslim League – Nawaz (PML-N) Senator Dr Afnan UIIah Khan on Thursday drafted a resolution in the Senate for the impeachment of President Dr Arif Alvi.
The development comes on the heels of the detailed verdict of the Supreme Court in which Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel - in a special note - urged action against former prime minister Imran Khan, President Alvi, and others under Article 6.
“The Supreme Court of Pakistan in its recent historic detailed judgment outlines that Imran Khan, Arif Alvi, Qasim Suri, and Fawad Chaudhry blatantly transgressed the constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan when they didn’t allow the voting on the no-confidence motion,” the draft read.

“There must be severe consequences for this blatant transgression and the law must take its course. Therefore, the senate of Pakistan should immediately initiate article 6 proceedings against Imran Khan, Arif Alvi, Qasim Suri, and Fawad Chaudhry,” Senator said in the resolution draft.
“The House also calls upon the Government to initiate impeachment proceedings against Arif Alvi as he is an alleged traitor and should not occupy the honorable position of the President of Islamic Republic of Pakistan.”
However, the resolution has only been drafted yet and not submitted to the Senate Secretariat.
 
I just got round to reading the judgement itself...and nowhere does it remotely indicate that the judge 'urged' article 6 proceedings, as written in the article headline.

Samaa took quite some liberty with the headline.

No wonder Nadeem Malik was also spouting nonsense today.
 
So basically this confirms that Pakistan is NOT a democratic country. This dysfunctional democracy is nothing but a joke. Everything is run by 2/3 generals/military rulers be it Parliament, EC, bureaucracy, SC, spineless CJ and other judges. Establishment controls everything from behind and pulls strings but doesn't want to come to the foreground because the world usually deals with Civilian Govt only.

The million dollar question is, when and how these generals/military rulers will be held accountable for the sins they've committed and the corruption they've done? When any court in Pakistan will trial them for high treason cases? Not sure if it will get materialized in my lifetime.
 
I just got round to reading the judgement itself...and nowhere does it remotely indicate that the judge 'urged' article 6 proceedings, as written in the article headline.

Samaa took quite some liberty with the headline.

No wonder Nadeem Malik was also spouting nonsense today.
Bhai violation of the constitution invokes article 6.
1657825605893.png
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom