What's new

SC acquits Aasia Bibi in blasphemy case

she admited it multiple times to doing it
stop defending a farce judgement

We number well beyond the majority. We, the sane people of Pakistan, don't have time to come out on the streets because we are busy with our lives and are actually useful to society unlike these Mullahs who have nothing in their life, who think it is okay to curse, riot, and use violence. Don't take our inability to take out time and resources because we have actual lives to come out on the street as us not existing.
 
.
Even the Mullah brigade don't believe and follow Quran & Sunnah, If they were doing so then we wouldn't have been in this mess.
just because some scholars dont follow it does not mean that its part of islam to not follow it
Islam stays Islam
 
.
why is that libtards who have no knowledge of islam tell others what islam is?
everytime they do this they misquote and misinterpret hadiths and verses.
just stop

I am no libtard, if you got evidence, bring it. Why is it that you don't quote the relevant verses and hadiths WITH THEIR CONTEXTS if you are so truthful!

I have studied Islamiat in great detail from multiple tutors, kindly don't lecture me on this, thanks.
 
.
Citation needed here, show us evidence that she said such a thing then we will go next phase, the evidence must be absolute leaving no doubt otherwise it does not permit such a huge punishment. Next up, the points you have mentioned are minor and they flow forward and back in Pakistani politics, nothing new. As for democratic system, that's your opinion, it works well for many states, it can work well for us too.
Sir if you think this is a just normal decision then sir you are taking it lightly and wrongly ,this decision will lead to Black swan effect, asiya admitted it before trial court her 164 crp statement is there in trial court, her video was there on social media before it was deleted, her video with salman taseer was suggesting her stance, later that video vanished, the judges from lower court to the high court were not insane that they held up with her punishment, secondly supreme Court is silent about her confession but proactive on technicalities, why this technical issue always comes before this CJP , see pnama verdict, NSs suspension of punishment by high court, closing of Hudaibiya paper cuse on technical grounds a day before and announcement of assiya,s case today, and before that topi darama of IG suspension SP suspension etc ,
 
Last edited:
. .
We number well beyond the majority. We, the sane people of Pakistan, don't have time to come out on the streets because we are busy with our lives and are actually useful to society unlike these Mullahs who have nothing in their life, who think it is okay to curse, riot, and use violence. Don't take our inability to take out time and resources because we have actual lives to come out on the street as us not existing.
no you dont
you libtards number only a few thousand families
stop lying
you will be lynched on the street anywhere in paksitan if you express your degenerate views
 
.
Have you ever thought why? Because in Islam, you cannot award someone Capital Punishment unless there is absolute doubtless proof. Even the concept of four witnesses cannot work in todays age like it used to back in that time; let me give you context, back in the time, even when four witnesses were drawn, it was made sure that they were absolutely pious, known to be truthful and trustworthy, and had NO past accounts of Islamic law or general society discipline breaking. That was the standard. Therefore, mere words or four unknown witnesses are not enough to appropriate Capital Punishment as an award to someone.

A Muslim who goes to the mosque five times a day is considered honest and pious. Let's apply the same logic then. Why should we believe a non-Muslim woman is speaking the truth post fact? Where is your 'level of proof' when you take her words for granted?

But you have shown your true nature by stating that the concept of four witnesses no longer works. Did you hear this from a valid religious scholar? Do you think the Creator of the Universe did not know (Ma'aaz Allah) what the situation will be 1400 years later? You have just destroyed your own position as someone whose words could be given merit. You are yourself on shaky grounds regarding the feasibility of Islam, you need to first go and learn Islam yourself before calling to question its teachings.
 
.
Sir if you think this is a just normal decision then sir you are taking it lightly and wrongly ,this decision will lead to Black swan effect, asiya admitted it before trial court her 164 crp statement is there in trial court, her video was there on social media before it was deleted, her video with salman taseer was suggesting her stance, later that video vanished, the judges from lower court to the high court were not insane that held up with her punishment, secondly supreme Court is silent about her confession but proactive on technicalities, what this technical issue always comes before this CJP , see pnama verdict, NSs suspension of pinispunis by high court, closing of Hudaibiya paper cuse on technical grounds a day before and announcement of assiya,s case today, and before that topi darama of IG suspension SP suspension etc ,

They say that what gets to social media, stays on there, so I am not buying this crap that it surfaced social media but 'was removed', bull crap, so many people view it, it gets shared, saved and propagated within seconds.

Again, more words, nothing of value to actually prove that she admitted.
 
.
for greater interest of Pakistan that not matter we should focus on choosing that option which is good for Pakistan as a whole.Nation come above individuals.Consider if terrorist take control of building in which there are innocent then army not think of saving those innocent and not wait for terrorists but kill them though ordinary people may be killed to save rest of public
For greater interest of state kill innocent right good going
 
. .
Dude, is there a fucking video or something, maybe recording or news article which cites this.

You don't know meaning of Citations, Proof or Evidence. You can't rely on words, the world has changed, sinless people don't exist like in the 7th century where society was interconnected and you could verify the degree of a person is truthful too.

If she has admitted, then need video, recording, news article and something of that sort, anything else will not suffice, specially your words.

How about you bring a quote from a valid scholar, or an authentic religious text that 'the rules for evidence have changed'.
 
. . .
no you dont
you libtards number only a few thousand families
stop lying
you will be lynched on the street anywhere in paksitan if you express your degenerate views

Funny you call me a libtard, Alhumdulillah I have many friends who are hafiz-e-Quran, I am a devout follower, and I read the Quran weekly.

Only sick people like you can think that Punishment on the basis of allegation alone is enough, specially in this day and age when liars, jealousy and corrupt retards like you are everywhere.
 
.
Funny you call me a libtard, Alhumdulillah I have many friends who are hafiz-e-Quran, I am a devout follower, and I read the Quran weekly.

Only sick people like you can think that Punishment on the basis of allegation alone is enough, specially in this day and age when liars, jealousy and corrupt retards like you are everywhere.
you are twisting words again

forgot to add,you are clearly confused about your religion
you follow some tenets but refuse to follow others
fix yourself before talking abojt islam
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom