What's new

Saudis ‘So Unhappy' With Obama They Sent Emissaries to China, Russia Seekin

Cheetah786

PDF VETERAN
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
9,002
Reaction score
-3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Iraq yesterday, NBC’s Tom Brokaw said the Saudi Arabian monarchy is “so unhappy with the Obama administration for the way it pushed out President Mubarak of Egypt” that it has sent senior officials to the Peoples' Republic of China and Russia to seek expanded business opportunities with those countries.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates “will face some tough questions in this region about the American intentions going on now with all this new turmoil, especially in an area where the United States has such big stakes politically and economically.”

“And a lot of those questions presumably will come from King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia,”

NBC

Saudis are so unhappy with the Obama administration for the way it pushed out President Mubarak of Egypt that it sent high level emissaries to China and Russia to tell those two countries that Saudi Arabia now is prepared to do more business with them.”


Cant wait for the Americans to bring democracy in Arabia
 
. .
(Reuters) - Defense Secretary Robert Gates visited Saudi Arabia, the world's top oil exporter and a major buyer of U.S. arms, on Wednesday to reaffirm U.S. support for a country that is a regional anchor of U.S. security policy.

Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said Gates would discuss unrest sweeping the region with the elderly King Abdullah during his brief visit to the Gulf kingdom, the latest in a series of visits to Middle Eastern nations in recent weeks.

Saudi Arabia, which sits on more than a fifth of world oil reserves, has not seen the same degree of popular protests that have toppled Arab leaders in Tunisia and Egypt and have others battling for their political lives.

But the kingdom is dealing with internal pressures of its own as Saudi Shi'ites complain of discrimination and authorities scramble to find jobs for millions of young people.

Last month, hundreds of Shi'ites protested peacefully in the kingdom's oil-producing east in support of Shi'ites in Bahrain and political freedoms.

King Abdullah announced $93 billion in social handouts in March, the second benefits package to be unveiled within a month, as part of the government's efforts to stave off the kind of unrest that has gripped neighboring Bahrain, Yemen and Oman, and to strengthen the pillars of Saudi family rule.

With critics accusing President Barack Obama of failing to chart a clear course for dealing with uprisings across the Arab world, especially in Libya, a senior defense official told reporters traveling with Gates the Saudi visit would reflect the administration's "pragmatic" approach to the unrest in the region -- supporting reform but not pushing precipitous change.

"We've been consistent about the set of principles that we stand for. We also have real strategic partnerships in this part of the world," the official said on condition of anonymity.

"We are going to continue to make sure that our partners understand we're not abandoning them - while we continue to have a frank conversation with them about these reforms."

In Saudi Arabia, the official said, discussions would center on political change across the region rather than Saudi Arabia's own internal situation.

King Abdullah has started some cautious reforms but encountered resistance from Saudi's powerful religious elite.

"It's important for us to work closely and to share views with our partners in the region, so we're looking for the king's perspective," the defense official said.

Saudi Arabia's decision last month to send troops to nearby Bahrain in a bid to help contain Shi'ite unrest there came as a surprise to U.S. officials just after Gates had left the tiny island kingdom during another Middle East visit.

IRANIAN ROLE

Shi'ite Iran is also certain to be a focus of the talks.

"Clearly whenever (Gates) visits the Saudis and anyone else in the region, Iran will be a major focus of the conversation, both in terms of the regional threat they pose in pursuit of their nuclear program, their ballistic missile program -- also lately in the role they've been playing to try to exploit the unrest in the region to their advantage," Morell told reporters.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad accused his arch foe the United States and other western nations on Monday of fomenting unrest in his ally Syria and across the Arab Middle East to secure Israel's position.

Iran, which has crushed its own opposition protests at home, has welcomed uprisings in the region as an "Islamic awakening" against despotic rulers.

U.S. officials say Iran has not had an active role in triggering the recent Arab uprisings but warn it could try to increase its influence across the region at a delicate moment.

"The longer this crisis drags out, the more opportunities there will be for Iran to meddle in a way that is not in our interest and not in Saudi Arabia's interest," the defense official said.

(Editing by Nick Macfie and Elizabeth Fullerton)

Defense Secretary Gates, Saudi king to discuss Mideast unrest | Reuters
 
. . . .
let's ask what people want.

i am sure they would prefer democracy in their nation.
 
. .
How would it be better if they all democratically think "We need destroy Israel"?

Are you serious you think dictators are better for the future of middle east?there could be a Islamic revolution likes Iran cause peoples are fed up with dictators and then you will have all mullahs that will be anti Israel.
 
.
Are you serious you think dictators are better for the future of middle east?

there could be a islamic reveloution like iran cause people are fed up with dictators and then you will have all mullahs that will be anti israel.
Think about it this way, since the beginning of Israel every single Muslim country(Except Iran and Turkey at the day) have been fed by their leaders stories about big bad Israel, and they themselves passed down that hatred to their children and so on and so on.
These dictators knew first hand never to mess with Israel from past experiences but their people never stopped wanting Israel to be destroyed, so they are the people that will elect a leader willing to realize their life long dreams.
At least with the dictators we knew who we were up against and they knew Israel was a country not to be trifled with, so they stopped warring with us and were afraid of us. The people thought they were cowards and might try to initiate a new war through a democratically elected leader.
Democracy is not the solution here, end to hatred is. And no such end is in anyone`s sight.
 
.
Think about it this way, since the beginning of Israel every single Muslim country(Except Iran and Turkey at the day) have been fed by their leaders stories about big bad Israel, and they themselves passed down that hatred to their children and so on and so on.
These dictators knew first hand never to mess with Israel from past experiences but their people never stopped wanting Israel to be destroyed, so they are the people that will elect a leader willing to realize their life long dreams.
At least with the dictators we knew who we were up against and they knew Israel was a country not to be trifled with, so they stopped warring with us and were afraid of us. The people thought they were cowards and might try to initiate a new war through a democratically elected leader.
Democracy is not the solution here, end to hatred is. And no such end is in anyone`s sight.

I agree with you about the hatred part but you see this is what the problem is most hatred in Muslim countries against Israel is created by un educated mullahs who directly or indirectly are supported by the same dictators.

on one hand these dictators tell the world we can control these extremists and on the other they support and create the same fundos behind the scene.

As far as the war goes i would be more afraid of the dictators who will do any thing and i mean any thing to stay in power including killing there own people same people can start a war to please there people hatred towards Israel.

democratically elected governments will have to work hard to create more opportunities for there people including creating employment (empty hands are devils play ground) or get ready to be kicked out in the next election.
 
.
I agree with you about the hatred part but you see this is what the problem is most hatred in Muslim countries against Israel is created by un educated mullahs who directly or indirectly are supported by the same dictators.

on one hand these dictators tell the world we can control these extremists and on the other they support and create the same fundos behind the scene.

As far as the war goes i would be more afraid of the dictators who will do any thing and i mean any thing to stay in power including killing there own people same people can start a war to please there people hatred towards Israel.

democratically elected governments will have to work hard to create more opportunities for there people including creating employment (empty hands are devils play ground) or get ready to be kicked out in the next election.

That is totally false. Look at India for a counterexample.
 
.
Think about it this way, since the beginning of Israel every single Muslim country(Except Iran and Turkey at the day) have been fed by their leaders stories about big bad Israel, and they themselves passed down that hatred to their children and so on and so on.
These dictators knew first hand never to mess with Israel from past experiences but their people never stopped wanting Israel to be destroyed, so they are the people that will elect a leader willing to realize their life long dreams.
At least with the dictators we knew who we were up against and they knew Israel was a country not to be trifled with, so they stopped warring with us and were afraid of us. The people thought they were cowards and might try to initiate a new war through a democratically elected leader.
Democracy is not the solution here, end to hatred is. And no such end is in anyone`s sight.

even your prime minister says that they want a more DEMOCRATIC midle east.

and by that said, do you really think arabs are that stupid?

"they will elect someone who wants to kill israel", what a stupid comment, do we elect people in turkey just to DESTROY Greece then?

there is other things those arabs cares about to you know, not just israel. what about their future! now they have a chance and your saying NO DONT LET THE HATEFULL DICTATORS GO, LET THEIR PEOPLE SUFFER INSTEAD OF OURS, what kind of human are you?
 
.
even your prime minister says that they want a more DEMOCRATIC midle east.

and by that said, do you really think arabs are that stupid?

"they will elect someone who wants to kill israel", what a stupid comment, do we elect people in turkey just to DESTROY Greece then?

there is other things those arabs cares about to you know, not just israel. what about their future! now they have a chance and your saying NO DONT LET THE HATEFULL DICTATORS GO, LET THEIR PEOPLE SUFFER INSTEAD OF OURS, what kind of human are you?

Practical. I care about my country and friends of my country, why should i care about my enemies? I`m no bleeding heart that wishes a better life for the people that hate me. That being said, cheetah does have a point. Maybe if they have a better life from democracy, they won`t be quick to wage war.
 
.
saudi Arabia is such a joke lol
They're always reacting to things around them. You never see them taking a lead on anything. Always responding to things around them and when they fall behind, they start pointing fingers.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom