ResurgentIran
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2013
- Messages
- 3,813
- Reaction score
- -4
It would be just a weapons sale and that too to SA we are not sending our troops to Syria or delivering our weapons directly to Syrians .
Besides Iran for past 3-4 decades sided with India and even today is the only source for Indian access to afghanistan via chabahar , when Iran doesnt address our concerns we should answer her in the same plate. On the other hand Iran is actively supporting and arming Asad's regime which lost its credibility after killing thousands of Syrians .
What a bunch of nonsense. Iran is not a party to the Pakistan-India conflict. It has been trying to build up neutral stance and good relations with both India and Pakistan.
And thats what Pakistan should do as well in Iran-Saudi regional conflict, instead of actively taking a side (whether its in Syria or elsewhere)
Being neutral is the most responsible policy, especially since Iran is your direct bordering neighbour and Saudi Arabia is not. I understand Pakistanis have spiritual affinity to Saudi Arabia. But I have never understood this indulgence towards the House of Saud, which is a godless decadent tribe and family.
I can counter your "Chah Bahar" argument with the IP pipeline agreement Iran had with Pakistan. Iran was trying to help your economy and energy security, and spent a lot of work building that pipeline on its side of the border.
In the end it was Pakistan that failed to live up to its commitments in IP gas pipeline project.
Take a careful look at yourself before blaming Iran for relations with India.
The IP pipeline was of MUCH greater significance than Chah Bahar, and in the end it was you that pulled away.
Do you what's funny? It is in Iran's strategic interests to have a strong Pakistan, because its a buffer state against India. We dont view things in a sectarian manner.
Although if Pakistan actively takes side with Saudi Arabia against Iran, then reciprocally our sense of interests will also change.
Last edited: