925boy
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2016
- Messages
- 6,010
- Reaction score
- -31
- Country
- Location
Time to shut down your PDF propaganda...
But Iran hit ISIS in Syria and Kurdish group in Northern Iraq within the past year with precise ballistic missiles and they hit accurately so Iran has demonstrated precision strikes 100s of kilometers away. Are you living in 2019 or 1990? Iran can successfully strike 100s of kilometers away, not just "30km in Persian Gulf". All regional countries know this.Persian gulf is hardly 30km. This means even artillery fire can block it completely. So, there is limited scope for any naval engagement even if Iran doesn't have good military.
And its good enough to land precise BMs in Israel(few regional centers that can be hit numerously and precisely) and regional countries (probably most consistently within 1500km from Iran though). You are grossly under estimating Iran's capabilities, but its because you actually dunno what they are. you just talk sophisticated, but you're just stating outright lies.Iranian ballistic missiles are good enough to wipe out oil installation of Saudi Arabia, UAE and other GCC countries.
Iran can do more than disrupt oil in PG. why such a limited understanding of a complex issue? Open your mind and consider ALL the factors at play. You act as though Iran(for eg) doesnt have ground forces spread over the ME.This means that if Iran is attacked, it can ensure that 50% of the world oil exports is disrupted.
US can pay for oil disruption(afterall, it wont happen for a long time) more than dead US soldiers. thats what you are ignoring.This is a big price which none is willing to pay. Petroleum ia needed on regular and continuous basis and can't be allowed to be disrupted.
no one is talking about Nuclear warheads or weapons. BMs without nuclear warheads are useless? what planet are you living in? this makes no sense. If Iranian ballistic missiles strikes are useless and inprecise, then tell me why Trump now wants Iranian BM development, types, numbers and usage to be included in new "negotiations "btwn US and Iran? the reality contradicts what you're saying here.Secondly, Iran doesn't have big enough nuclear warheads to attach on BM. This means that even if Iran has BM, it isn't really useful.
Go sit down with your propaganda BS. Iran has received(at least)newer BM tech from Russia or/and China. For common sense sake, Iran already has Multiple re-entry vehicle technology and already has BMs(sejjil for ex) that ABM systems cant intercept(and even if they do, they cant intercept most or intercept them consistently).Iran, however, can have missile technology like Styx missile (used by India in 1971 war against Karachi) which can target installations precisely.
Open your mind and open your scope- Iran isn't called/gunning for regional hegemon position to only have strength and dominance in the PErsian gulf. Iran has influence in multiple regional countries outside Persian gulf, so you really need more education.Considering the proximity of Iran to the oil facilities of GCC, these missiles are good enough to destroy these targets.
No, its dead US soldiers thats preventing US, thats why US didnt strike after recent provocations. US and Israel prefer to fight countries that cant do much damage to US aka kill US soldiers. US knows it cant attack IRan without risk to US soldiers lives, and thats whats deterring US.It is the importance of oil supply that is preventing USA from attacking Iran. It is not the fear of Iranian prowess that keeps USA from attacking