What's new

Saudi-led Islamic military alliance: counterterrorism or counter Iran?

In the End...whatever they are right or wrong..; it's their choice. and tbh, they already hve problems in their countries... with terro... they will not spend any more "support" to fight someone else mess...

Then they should, first and foremost, not criticize the others who are members. That's #1. #2, don't expect any form of support in return. They can laugh all they want about it, but if and when the time comes where their country is embroiled in some major dilemma, they'll need to remember that they're not a priority.

As for this alliance... I..myself doubt it's meaning and his capacity to answer problems...when even btw them they are not entirely alligned...

And this will help that cause, hence the term "alliance." It has to start somewhere.

Many Question is still needed to be answered... Are they going to fight by sending boots where tero is? Will thisnew group be used in Yemen to continue their mess? Will they help funding states of this alliance to buy new equipment or else to help them fight it in thir own lands alone? or is it just a political stunt...saying " Here we are? and you? Where are you and with who?"

It's all of the above. If you look through history, alliances go a long way in creating coalitions and pacts of support for member nations. The support comes in all forms, from money to intel to military assistance to economic assistance to diplomatic assistance and so on and so forth. There are only benefits to something like this.

I have my share of opinion on it also...

As you can see also..; the alliance is quite centric... where are the north central Asian countries? per exemple? or Indonesia? etc...

Someone has to be the base, and who is more qualified than the custodians of the center of Islam? That's how the world works and in this case, besides being the custodians of Islam's holiest sites, the current country with the most clout and outreach in the region is Saudiya and it's only right that it leads the parade. But if you look at the appointing of the alliance's leader, what does that tell you? It's on the right track. Raheel Sharif is not an Arab, but a Muslim, and Pakistan is not an enemy of Iran by any means, quite the opposite. So the twisting of "agenda-basing" and Saudi-centric is completely unfounded. This is the new version of the Arab Republic but instead of limiting it to a nationality based organization, it's based on Muslim nations which is the best thing possible to unite us all. This is the biggest difference (among many others) in what Nasser tried to do and failed miserably because he only wanted an Arab unity, whereas a Muslim one makes complete sense and why it will be very successful.

There will always be negatives about everything, but in this case, the positives completely outweigh the negative. I can see why some would doubt the intentions, but to completely ignore the obvious is simply crazy.

And most countries have not the logictics, neither equipment to take part on any fronts outside of their lands.. like Tunisia per exemple... she doesn't have enought for hers let alone to send away...

And that's the whole point! It gives what it can and when it's in need, the countries that have the logistic capabilities come to its aid. It's not that complicated walahi!

But i think the most important point is the lack of Doctrine and Ideology behind it... and Fighting Terrorism is not one of them... it' s just a result of smthing/someone... but not that "Smthing/one"

How can you say terrorism is not one of them? That's crazy bro what do you base that on? It's the #1 thing about this whole alliance. This thing just formed and already we're judging not only its intentions but the results? It will take a little time just like anything else.
 
.
Saudi Arabia leading an alliance to fight terrorism is like Hitler leading an alliance to fight SS. Nonetheless, as soon as member states (those independent, stronger ones like Pakistan, Turkey) smell that this 'alliance' wants something other than fighting 'terrorism', e.g. targeting Iran, they will scatter around in no time. Except these few major countries, almost all others are very poor nations mostly bribed by Saudis to join the group, which are no relevant.

I am sure even Turkey and Pakistan are on this "alliance" just on paper, maybe on small issues they will show "solidarity" however they would never trade ties with Iran over Saudi Arabia or any Arab nation. Saudis are doomed and who knows if they will be around in 50 or 100 years, Iran on the other hand will be.
 
.
Yet they're always touting their assistance in 1967 and 1973, why the change of heart and policy?

Nearly half a decade.
Too many years for any country to be stagnant.
Does not work.
Policies change with the times.
 
.
Iran was invited to join, wasn't it? Why didn't it?
You should also know that Egypt and the majority of the member countries don't stand against Iran. Egypt has conflicted with Saudiya on that matter quite a bit, and that includes its stand on Syria as well.

So the idea that this entire thing is formed to counter Iran is frankly silly.
Because it's a cover. It was formed in 2015 by singling out the "Islamic State" (IS) as a disease tarnishing the name of Islam so my Q is what they have done regarding fighting of terrorism?
 
.
Then they should, first and foremost, not criticize the others who are members. That's #1. #2, don't expect any form of support in return. They can laugh all they want about it, but if and when the time comes where their country is embroiled in some major dilemma, they'll need to remember that they're not a priority.



And this will help that cause, hence the term "alliance." It has to start somewhere.



It's all of the above. If you look through history, alliances go a long way in creating coalitions and pacts of support for member nations. The support comes in all forms, from money to intel to military assistance to economic assistance to diplomatic assistance and so on and so forth. There are only benefits to something like this.



Someone has to be the base, and who is more qualified than the custodians of the center of Islam? That's how the world works and in this case, besides being the custodians of Islam's holiest sites, the current country with the most clout and outreach in the region is Saudiya and it's only right that it leads the parade. But if you look at the appointing of the alliance's leader, what does that tell you? It's on the right track. Raheel Sharif is not an Arab, but a Muslim, and Pakistan is not an enemy of Iran by any means, quite the opposite. So the twisting of "agenda-basing" and Saudi-centric is completely unfounded. This is the new version of the Arab Republic but instead of limiting it to a nationality based organization, it's based on Muslim nations which is the best thing possible to unite us all. This is the biggest difference (among many others) in what Nasser tried to do and failed miserably because he only wanted an Arab unity, whereas a Muslim one makes complete sense and why it will be very successful.

There will always be negatives about everything, but in this case, the positives completely outweigh the negative. I can see why some would doubt the intentions, but to completely ignore the obvious is simply crazy.



And that's the whole point! It gives what it can and when it's in need, the countries that have the logistic capabilities come to its aid. It's not that complicated walahi!



How can you say terrorism is not one of them? That's crazy bro what do you base that on? It's the #1 thing about this whole alliance. This thing just formed and already we're judging not only its intentions but the results? It will take a little time just like anything else.

I understand your view and share some.
But as we are and where we are... we can't say for sure with our current knowledge and position the true meaning of such alliance... And let's not be blind to it either... they are not doing it for others... they are doing it to gain a supportive power. So that's why there is many Question to it.

As for Terrorism... yes it is meant for it... but Terro is not an ideology from thin air... it's a consequence of a political move... and le'ts say Terrorism is over in 10-15 years... what will be of this alliance? removed? or will be methamorphosing to something else?

Look per exemple what is happening in Yemen... not speaking about the Houthis..;but about the Saudi let coalition... KSA support HAdi groups who are also made of Ex-AQ and armed Islamist... Somthing UAE do not agree with... So we are in this perverted circle of "the enemy of my enemy is my "temporary" friend"...

As for A pakistani General appointed to this alliance...well let's not fall into the simple minded observer... this alliance need Pakistan and his support and mostly their powerfull army on their side, so appointing a Pakistani general who also happen to be a Competent one is one those strategic moves and win-win.

As for Algeria... She had fought alone for decades Terros...all alone...with no help... and they did great...
"You are always better served by yourself"
Same for Tunisia...we fought it alone... and they are almost gone...
Same goes for Egypt... I'm pretty sure ,she doesn't need foreign boots to help her... she just need time and work to achieve what she desire.

The Only one to benefit from this alliance...are the one who made it...

ps: if they happan to make an alliance in the same ideology of NATO..; well At this moment I can understand... But it seems they ar eusing terro escuse to hide a Nato like ambition... toward an "enemy"

Ps2: In the End, I should be clear... i'm not agaisnt it, I may have Questions about it, but if it could help why not... but as of today, I have my doubt.
In french we say " L'hopital qui se fout de la Charité" I think the English version is "It's the pot calling the kettle black"
 
.
Iran and Terrorism are Two Sides of the Same Coin
The founder of terrorism are the Saudis they are champions of the world

Saudi-led Islamic military alliance: counterterrorism or counter Iran?

A Saudi-formed Islamic counterterrorism alliance raises questions over whether it will work, what it will do and its ultimate goal. It appears to be aimed at Iran as much as at extremists.

41537483_303.jpg


Saudi Arabia's powerful Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on Sunday convened the first summit of the Islamic Military Counterterrorism Alliance, with top defense officials from some 40 Muslim countries attending.

Saudi Arabia announced the alliance in December 2015 to fight "terrorism," singling out the "Islamic State" (IS) as a disease tarnishing the name of Islam.

In opening remarks in Riyadh on Sunday, Prince Mohammed said the alliance would "work together to support the military, financial, intelligence and political efforts of every member state" to battle terrorism and extremist ideology.

"The biggest danger of this terrorism and extremism is the tarnishing of the reputation of our beloved religion. ... We will not allow this to happen," he said.

The alliance initially had 34 members, but now includes 41 countries, according to the Saudi government. It has taken no action so far. From the beginning, it was unclear what the alliance would do or whether it would be able to wield any real power.

Now that IS has been largely defeated in Syria and Iraq, those questions remain, as does the question of the alliance's goals. The Saudis insist it is a work in progress.

41538417_401.png



Saudi Arabia leading the fight against extremism?

The United States has long urged Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries to take a more proactive role countering terrorism and extremist ideology.

For the young crown prince, who has consolidated control over the country, the alliance is a way to show himself as the Arab world's leader at a time when the United States' leadership in the region is in question.

"This alliance is a clear signal to the Arab-Islamic world that Saudi Arabia still wants to set the main agenda in regional policy and, of course, another instrument of containing Iran," said Sebastian Sons, an associate fellow at the German Council of Foreign Relations.

Saudi Arabia is a member of the US-led coalition against IS, but its role has been marginal. It has instead become bogged down in a war in Yemen against Houthi rebels it says are backed by Iran.

Some critics dismiss the alliance as a propaganda exercise, likening Saudi Arabia's leadership role to having the fox watch over the hen house.

It has been pointed out that Saudi Arabia's Wahhabi ideology ultimately gave birth to violent extremist groups, including al-Qaida and IS.

Arab Gulf oil wealth has funneled billions of dollars around the globe to promote a puritanical and ultraconservative form of Sunni Islam at odds with mainstream Sunnism.

However, the 32-year-old crown prince has sought to create an image of himself as a modernizer to lead a transformation in the kingdom.

"Saudi Arabia wants to present itself as a leading country in the fight against extremism and terrorism in order to get away from its image as a sponsor of radicalism," Sons said. "In this regard, the fight against terrorism is a main pillar of the political agenda of Muhammad bin Salman in portraying himself as a modern, mainly secular leader of a 'new Saudi Arabia.'"

But the Saudi regime remains repressive, rights groups say, which leads to the question whether its role in a counterterrorism alliance is illogical and may backfire.

Contributing to these concerns, Saudi Arabia this month passed a new counterterrorism law with vague and broad definitions of terrorism, Human Rights Watch said.

Under the new legislation, criticism of the king and the crown prince has been criminalized as "terrorism," as well as other nonviolent acts, the human rights organization said.

These changes coincide with the crown prince's purge to consolidate his control.




Divided alliance

There is also the question of whether a diverse set of countries can agree on anything, let alone act together and coordinate.

While it is a simple step to name al-Qaida and IS as enemies, the alliance's member states hold differing views on groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood, the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah and the Palestinian militant group Hamas.

Qatar was originally part of the alliance, but was absent at the first summit. Saudi Arabia and its Arab allies cut ties and have isolated Qatar over alleged terrorism support and ties to Iran. But other alliance members, such as Turkey, have come to Qatar's aid.

Qatar is also strategically vital to the US as the forward headquarters of US Central Command, which is responsible for military operations in the Middle East.

Raheel Sharif, Pakistan's former army chief, was appointed commander-in-chief of the alliance. But Sharif's involvement in the grouping has been controversial in his country due to Islamabad's proximity to and ties with Tehran.

Is Iran the real target?

Alliance members belong to the Sunni-majority or Sunni-led countries, which could deepen the Shiite-Sunni divide across the Middle East.

Notably, the alliance excludes Saudi Arabia's archrival Shiite Iran, which has backed the Syrian government's fight against foreign-backed rebels and IS. Syria is also not a member.

It also doesn't include Iraq, which is led by a Shiite government and whose army, alongside Iran-backed militia, have largely defeated IS on the battlefield with US support.

The Sunni nature of the alliance fuels the perception that it is directed against Iran during a time when Riyadh and Tehran are fighting for influence in the Middle East, including in Yemen, Syria and Lebanon.

"The definition of extremism in Saudi propaganda is that Iran is the terrorist. Thus, every anti-extremism measure is directed to roll back Iran's influence in the region and to demonize the Islamic Republic as the main sponsor of terrorism," Sons said.
No because most of these countries have relations with iran

This Sunni alliance goal to fight against Sunni terrorism because if they fight against Shia or iran it will be a sectarian war
 
.
I am sure even Turkey and Pakistan are on this "alliance" just on paper, maybe on small issues they will show "solidarity" however they would never trade ties with Iran over Saudi Arabia or any Arab nation. Saudis are doomed and who knows if they will be around in 50 or 100 years, Iran on the other hand will be.

Since when has a nobody troll like you any say in what Turkey and Pakistan values?

1) Pakistan's economic and military cooperation with KSA is many times bigger than their cooperation with Iran and that has been the case for decades. The largest Pakistani diaspora in the world is located in KSA and the GCC. Millions upon millions of Pakistanis are dependent on the remittances that derive from this community. I am not even talking about the other over 20 Arab countries. Only a complete ignorant clown would even attempt to make it sound like Iran is more important for Pakistan than the entire Arab world. Let alone just 1 Arab country in the form of KSA.

According to a recent poll in Pakistan, the Pakistani people (PDF is no representation) look at China and KSA as their closest allies and partners.

2) Last time I checked Turkey has been desperate to have cordial ties with most Arab countries, especially economically. Without bothering to check the statistics I am 100% sure that the GCC-Turkey trade is bigger than the Turkey-Iran trade and if that is not the case surely the Arab world - Turkey trade is bigger than the Turkey-Iran trade.

3) Everyone knows that you are a inferiority ridden Arab-obsessed troll but your last statement is hilarious even for your standards. The notion of Arabia is several millennia older than the notion of Iran. The earliest known civilizations and entities native to Arabia are similarly several millennia older than the oldest counterparts in Iran. Human presence in Arabia predates Iran by almost 20.000 years.

4) Yes, the by far largest state in the Middle East, the most ethnically/religiously stable/homogenous, the richest (per capita considering population and size - lightyears ahead of your supposed country Turkey for instance let alone Iran, LOL), a G-20 major economy member state (the only in the region alongside Turkey), one of the most influential on all fronts, is doomed. In a alternative universe. There is a bigger change of Iran's borders changing once again than KSA's.



PDF.:lol:

Brother @Gomig-21 is spot on as usual. Nobodies crying on a forum while 85% of all Muslim-majority nations have joined. If this Islamic Military Alliance is such a horrible thing why has something similar not been created before? Why is it always KSA that needs to lead? All that crying and double standards.

Look per exemple what is happening in Yemen... not speaking about the Houthis..;but about the Saudi let coalition... KSA support HAdi groups who are also made of Ex-AQ and armed Islamist... Somthing UAE do not agree with... So we are in this perverted circle of "the enemy of my enemy is my "temporary" friend"...

Unfounded bull****.

Iran and Terrorism are Two Sides of the Same Coin

Definitely. Hence why they have been sanctioned, isolated and orchestrated from the international community. Everywhere where there is Iranian Wilayat al-Faqih Mullah influence there is chaos. Why is that?

Saudi Arabia leading an alliance to fight terrorism is like Hitler leading an alliance to fight SS. Nonetheless, as soon as member states (those independent, stronger ones like Pakistan, Turkey) smell that this 'alliance' wants something other than fighting 'terrorism', e.g. targeting Iran, they will scatter around in no time. Except these few major countries, almost all others are very poor nations mostly bribed by Saudis to join the group, which are no relevant.

An Iranian talking about terrorism. A funny world. The ground realities speak for themselves.

Iran was invited to join, wasn't it? Why didn't it?
You should also know that Egypt and the majority of the member countries don't stand against Iran. Egypt has conflicted with Saudiya on that matter quite a bit, and that includes its stand on Syria as well.

So the idea that this entire thing is formed to counter Iran is frankly silly.

Because the major sponsor of terrorism in the region is not interested in such alliances as that would crush all of their influence as it would mean the end of the terrorist groups that they are supporting in Yemen, Lebanon, Iraq, Syria and elsewhere openly. Hence no longer any proxy groups to control and influence. So even if say Mauritania had created an Islamic Military Alliance, they would not have joined. It is just an excuse.

The founder of terrorism are the Saudis they are champions of the world

It's time to change those flags and admit your real identity as an Iranian.

KSA is the champion of leading the region on most fronts today. As for terrorism it is 1 billion times bigger in Iraq alone. From Saddam Hussein to ISIS to Shia terrorist militias. The list is endless. Barking from failed and envious entities.

Citizens in KSA and the GCC should realize that our supposed "brothers and sisters" and fellow "Muslims" are nothing more than mostly parasites who want but who are not useful for anything. They are envious and hateful individuals who do not wish us the best. It is time to stop bothering about their problems and concentrate 100% on our own affairs and to work with real and useful partners. Ethnicity and religion should have no role in foreign policies, especially economical. No need to continue to kid yourself. Let them burn each other as usual. We should no longer care.
 
Last edited:
.
Unfounded bull****.

You can believe it if you want... but facts are here... UAE has problem with Hadi's around support... Whatever you like it or not... they ar enot betting on the same horse... UAE want a good part of his supporters to be out..;and are qualified as Ex-Aq ( or whatever def you want to put on it)... and Hadi group is fully supported by KSa... since tbh they need them to continue the fight on grounds.
It's not like, I'm saying UAE and KSA have problems... only on this "supporting" Hadi thingy...
 
.
You can believe it if you want... but facts are here... UAE has problem with Hadi's around support... Whatever you like it or not... they ar enot betting on the same horse... UAE want a good part of his supporters to be out..;and are qualified as Ex-Aq ( or whatever def you want to put on it)... and Hadi group is fully supported by KSa... since tbh they need them to continue the fight on grounds.
It's not like, I'm saying UAE and KSA have problems... only on this "supporting" Hadi thingy...

Unfounded bullshit cannot be taken seriously. Find prove of KSA apparently supporting AQAP or quit spreading bullshit on this already bullshit infested forum.

KSA is the country in the world alongside the US that has done the most to fight AQAP. That's a fact. Bullshit on the other hand is not.
 
.
Since when has a nobody troll like you any say in what Turkey and Pakistan values?

1) Pakistan's economic and military cooperation with KSA is many times bigger than their cooperation with Iran and that has been the case for decades. The largest Pakistani diaspora in the world is located in KSA and the GCC. Millions upon millions of Pakistanis are dependent on the remittances that derive from this community. I am not even talking about the other over 20 Arab countries. Only a complete ignorant clown would even attempt to make it sound like Iran is more important for Pakistan than the entire Arab world. Let alone just 1 Arab country in the form of KSA.

According to a recent poll in Pakistan, the Pakistani people (PDF is no representation) look at China and KSA as their closest allies and partners.

2) Last time I checked Turkey has been desperate to have cordial ties with most Arab countries, especially economically. Without bothering to check the statistics I am 100% sure that the GCC-Turkey trade is bigger than the Turkey-Iran trade and if that is not the case surely the Arab world - Turkey trade is bigger than the Turkey-Iran trade.

3) Everyone knows that you are a inferiority ridden Arab-obsessed troll but your last statement is hilarious even for your standards. The notion of Arabia is several millennia older than the notion of Iran. The earliest known civilizations and entities native to Arabia are similarly several millennia older than the oldest counterparts in Iran. Human presence in Arabia predates Iran by almost 20.000 years.

4) Yes, the by far largest state in the Middle East, the most ethnically/religiously stable/homogenous, the richest (per capita considering population and size - lightyears ahead of your supposed country Turkey for instance let alone Iran, LOL), a G-20 major economy member state (the only in the region alongside Turkey), one of the most influential on all fronts, is doomed. In a alternative universe. There is a bigger change of Iran's borders changing once again than KSA's.



PDF.:lol:

Brother @Gomig-21 is spot on as usual. Nobodies crying on a forum while 85% of all Muslim-majority nations have joined. If this Islamic Military Alliance is such a horrible thing why has something similar not been created before? Why is it always KSA that needs to lead? All that crying and double standards.



Unfounded bull****.



Definitely. Hence why they have been sanctioned, isolated and orchestrated from the international community. Everywhere where there is Iranian Wilayat al-Faqih Mullah influence there is chaos. Why is that?



An Iranian talking about terrorism. A funny world. The ground realities speak for themselves.



Because the major sponsor of terrorism in the region is not interested in such alliances as that would crush all of their influence as it would mean the end of the terrorist groups that they are supporting in Yemen, Lebanon, Iraq, Syria and elsewhere openly. Hence no longer any proxy groups to control and influence. So even if say Mauritania had created an Islamic Military Alliance, they would not have joined. It is just an excuse.



It's time to change those flags and admit your real identity as an Iranian.

KSA is the champion of leading the region on most fronts today. As for terrorism it is 1 billion times bigger in Iraq alone. From Saddam Hussein to ISIS to Shia terrorist militias. The list is endless. Barking from failed and envious entities.

Citizens in KSA and the GCC should realize that our supposed "brothers and sisters" and fellow "Muslims" are nothing more than mostly parasites who want but who are not useful for anything.
Shia militias are not terrorists they fight the terrorism don't believe your bigoted sectarian media

Saudi goal from forming this alliance is to cover the ideology that they spread in the past few years just like if iran fight against its own Shia allies in the region
the reason because all the world noticed that these terrorists are produced of the saudi religious education
 
.
Shia militias are not terrorists they fight the terrorism don't believe your bigoted sectarian media

Saudi goal from forming this alliance is to cover the ideology that they spread in the past few years just like if iran fight against its own Shia allies in the region
the reason because all the world noticed that these terrorists are produced of the saudi religious education

Shia militias are definitely terrorists by all accounts. From Hezbollah cultists to Houthi cultists to numerous Shia militias in Iraq who are led by traitors and who have taken part in mass-murders themselves. No different to Daesh other than doing it more silently. Local reports confirm all this. I can post first-hand accounts by locals or documentaries made by serious media (local as non-local) about this.

Anyway enjoy the growing influence of those monkeys and the new marriage law. KSA is moving the other way. Thank God.

Last time I checked Daesh is led by native Iraqis and most of the fighters are locals too. This is the failure of your beloved Al-Maliki. Stop blaming your failures on others when they have nothing to do with it. So around 2000 Saudi Arabians (there are more Russians alone) out of 30 million joining, mostly teenagers who are used as cannon fodder, changes nothing.

More bullshit. Islam itself is from KSA and all its major sects.

Not worshipping graves and supposed "saints" has nothing to do with terrorism. It is the most sane thing to do even if you were an atheist or an agnostic. Where in the Qur'an or Sunnah does it state that you have to worship graves or people made up of flesh and blood? Nowhere. "We" (sane Muslims) have all the arguments on our side while you have none.

KSA is the most important anti-terrorism partner of the world community in the region and has been recognized as such for well over 1 decade now. You know nothing.
 
.
Unfounded bullshit cannot be taken seriously. Find prove of KSA apparently supporting AQAP or quit spreading bullshit on this already bullshit infested forum.

KSA is the country in the world alongside the US that has done the most to fight AQAP. That's a fact. Bullshit on the other hand is not.
Where did I say that KSA support AQ in yemen? I said Hadi HAD on his ranks ex-AQ... Try to take the critics where it is... and keep it out of being personal...
AND yes UAE have problems with some of Hadi support...
 
.
Where did I say that KSA support AQ in yemen? I said Hadi HAD on his ranks ex-AQ... Try to take the critics where it is... and keep it out of being personal...
AND yes UAE have problems with some of Hadi support...

I don't waste my time on empty bullshit rumors that have nothing to do with the reality.

You keep blabbering about Hadi while he is not important. The key is to liberate all of Yemen (almost 90% has been liberated already) from a terrorist cult (Houthis) and a cancer (Ali Abdullah Saleh) so we can prevent Yemen from turning into a long-term problem next to our borders (another Afghanistan basically). Normality must return so Yemenis can have a chance to built a successful society.

BTW reading too much Al-Jazeera manure is harmful.
 
.
Shia militias are definitely terrorists by all accounts. From Hezbollah cultists to Houthi cultists to numerous Shia militias in Iraq who are led by traitors and who have taken part in mass-murders themselves. No different to Daesh other than doing it more silently. Local reports confirm all this. I can post first-hand accounts by locals or documentaries made by serious media (local as non-local) about this.

Anyway enjoy the growing influence of those monkeys and the new marriage law. KSA is moving the other way. Thank God.

Last time I checked Daesh is led by native Iraqis and most of the fighters are locals too. This is the failure of your beloved Al-Maliki. Stop blaming your failures on others when they have nothing to do with it. So around 2000 Saudi Arabians (there are more Russians alone) out of 30 million joining, mostly teenagers who are used as cannon fodder, changes nothing.

More bullshit. Islam itself is from KSA and all its major sects.

Not worshipping graves and supposed "saints" has nothing to do with terrorism. It is the most sane thing to do even if you were an atheist or an agnostic. Where in the Qur'an or Sunnah does it state that you have to worship graves or people made up of flesh and blood? Nowhere. "We" (sane Muslims) have all the arguments on our side while you have none.

KSA is the most important anti-terrorism partner of the world community in the region and has been recognized as such for well over 1 decade now. You know nothing.
dude they just Invented contracted marriage
so you can get married to nice iraqi lady for month or year hahahaha
what a clones
 
.
I don't waste my time on empty bullshit rumors that have nothing to do with the reality.

You keep blabbering about Hadi while he is not important. The key is to liberate all of Yemen (almost 90% has been liberated already) from a terrorist cult (Houthis) and a cancer (Ali Abdullah Saleh) so we can prevent Yemen from turning into a long-term problem next to our borders (another Afghanistan basically). Normality must return so Yemenis can have a chance to built a successful society.

BTW reading too much Al-Jazeera manure is harmful.
that's quite childish of you...
Anyway...
Best regards
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom