What's new

Saudi-led Islamic military alliance: counterterrorism or counter Iran?

ashok321

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
17,942
Reaction score
4
Country
Canada
Location
Malaysia
Saudi-led Islamic military alliance: counterterrorism or counter Iran?

A Saudi-formed Islamic counterterrorism alliance raises questions over whether it will work, what it will do and its ultimate goal. It appears to be aimed at Iran as much as at extremists.

41537483_303.jpg


Saudi Arabia's powerful Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on Sunday convened the first summit of the Islamic Military Counterterrorism Alliance, with top defense officials from some 40 Muslim countries attending.

Saudi Arabia announced the alliance in December 2015 to fight "terrorism," singling out the "Islamic State" (IS) as a disease tarnishing the name of Islam.

In opening remarks in Riyadh on Sunday, Prince Mohammed said the alliance would "work together to support the military, financial, intelligence and political efforts of every member state" to battle terrorism and extremist ideology.

"The biggest danger of this terrorism and extremism is the tarnishing of the reputation of our beloved religion. ... We will not allow this to happen," he said.

The alliance initially had 34 members, but now includes 41 countries, according to the Saudi government. It has taken no action so far. From the beginning, it was unclear what the alliance would do or whether it would be able to wield any real power.

Now that IS has been largely defeated in Syria and Iraq, those questions remain, as does the question of the alliance's goals. The Saudis insist it is a work in progress.

41538417_401.png



Saudi Arabia leading the fight against extremism?

The United States has long urged Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries to take a more proactive role countering terrorism and extremist ideology.

For the young crown prince, who has consolidated control over the country, the alliance is a way to show himself as the Arab world's leader at a time when the United States' leadership in the region is in question.

"This alliance is a clear signal to the Arab-Islamic world that Saudi Arabia still wants to set the main agenda in regional policy and, of course, another instrument of containing Iran," said Sebastian Sons, an associate fellow at the German Council of Foreign Relations.

Saudi Arabia is a member of the US-led coalition against IS, but its role has been marginal. It has instead become bogged down in a war in Yemen against Houthi rebels it says are backed by Iran.

Some critics dismiss the alliance as a propaganda exercise, likening Saudi Arabia's leadership role to having the fox watch over the hen house.

It has been pointed out that Saudi Arabia's Wahhabi ideology ultimately gave birth to violent extremist groups, including al-Qaida and IS.

Arab Gulf oil wealth has funneled billions of dollars around the globe to promote a puritanical and ultraconservative form of Sunni Islam at odds with mainstream Sunnism.

However, the 32-year-old crown prince has sought to create an image of himself as a modernizer to lead a transformation in the kingdom.

"Saudi Arabia wants to present itself as a leading country in the fight against extremism and terrorism in order to get away from its image as a sponsor of radicalism," Sons said. "In this regard, the fight against terrorism is a main pillar of the political agenda of Muhammad bin Salman in portraying himself as a modern, mainly secular leader of a 'new Saudi Arabia.'"

But the Saudi regime remains repressive, rights groups say, which leads to the question whether its role in a counterterrorism alliance is illogical and may backfire.

Contributing to these concerns, Saudi Arabia this month passed a new counterterrorism law with vague and broad definitions of terrorism, Human Rights Watch said.

Under the new legislation, criticism of the king and the crown prince has been criminalized as "terrorism," as well as other nonviolent acts, the human rights organization said.

These changes coincide with the crown prince's purge to consolidate his control.




Divided alliance

There is also the question of whether a diverse set of countries can agree on anything, let alone act together and coordinate.

While it is a simple step to name al-Qaida and IS as enemies, the alliance's member states hold differing views on groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood, the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah and the Palestinian militant group Hamas.

Qatar was originally part of the alliance, but was absent at the first summit. Saudi Arabia and its Arab allies cut ties and have isolated Qatar over alleged terrorism support and ties to Iran. But other alliance members, such as Turkey, have come to Qatar's aid.

Qatar is also strategically vital to the US as the forward headquarters of US Central Command, which is responsible for military operations in the Middle East.

Raheel Sharif, Pakistan's former army chief, was appointed commander-in-chief of the alliance. But Sharif's involvement in the grouping has been controversial in his country due to Islamabad's proximity to and ties with Tehran.

Is Iran the real target?

Alliance members belong to the Sunni-majority or Sunni-led countries, which could deepen the Shiite-Sunni divide across the Middle East.

Notably, the alliance excludes Saudi Arabia's archrival Shiite Iran, which has backed the Syrian government's fight against foreign-backed rebels and IS. Syria is also not a member.

It also doesn't include Iraq, which is led by a Shiite government and whose army, alongside Iran-backed militia, have largely defeated IS on the battlefield with US support.

The Sunni nature of the alliance fuels the perception that it is directed against Iran during a time when Riyadh and Tehran are fighting for influence in the Middle East, including in Yemen, Syria and Lebanon.

"The definition of extremism in Saudi propaganda is that Iran is the terrorist. Thus, every anti-extremism measure is directed to roll back Iran's influence in the region and to demonize the Islamic Republic as the main sponsor of terrorism," Sons said.
 
. . . . . .
Hey, @Ceylal , why isn't Algeria part of the ENTIRE Islamic alliance?

Its not obligatory for any Sunni Muslim nation to join such an alliance. Particularly when the Algerian national policy collides head on with alliance on the principled stand of Algerian Military = No wars outside our borders.
 
. . .
Saudi Arabia leading an alliance to fight terrorism is like Hitler leading an alliance to fight SS. Nonetheless, as soon as member states (those independent, stronger ones like Pakistan, Turkey) smell that this 'alliance' wants something other than fighting 'terrorism', e.g. targeting Iran, they will scatter around in no time. Except these few major countries, almost all others are very poor nations mostly bribed by Saudis to join the group, which are no relevant.
 
.
Its not obligatory for any Sunni Muslim nation to join such an alliance. Particularly when the Algerian national policy collides head on with alliance on the principled stand of Algerian Military = No wars outside our borders.

Yet they're always touting their assistance in 1967 and 1973, why the change of heart and policy? This is also a different form of war. It's not territorial or political which is what that silly policy of theirs is all about. It's about joining in defeating the evil disease that has plagued all Arab & Muslim countries, including theirs! There is also great emphasis on the symbolism of being partners in defeating evil cretinism. You stay out of that says a lot about you.

Algeria and GCC is like Fire and Water... or Oil and water...
Algeria has a politic of non-intervention...

So much for brotherhood, right? The point is, in case you missed it, is that the member quoted is always bitching about all the other Arab countries being traitors and what's his doing now?
 
. .
Saudi Arabia leading an alliance to fight terrorism is like Hitler leading an alliance to fight SS. Nonetheless, as soon as member states (those independent, stronger ones like Pakistan, Turkey) smell that this 'alliance' wants something other than fighting 'terrorism', e.g. targeting Iran, they will scatter around in no time. Except these few major countries, almost all others are very poor nations mostly bribed by Saudis to join the group, which are no relevant.

LOL, so Oman was bribed, UAE was bribed as well....
look your pathetic country refused to join the first Islamic Coalition which's mainly formed to counter Terrorism and preferred to stay alone and continue its devastating role in the region by supporting Terrorists.
 
.
Saudi Arabia leading an alliance to fight terrorism is like Hitler leading an alliance to fight SS. Nonetheless, as soon as member states (those independent, stronger ones like Pakistan, Turkey) smell that this 'alliance' wants something other than fighting 'terrorism', e.g. targeting Iran, they will scatter around in no time. Except these few major countries, almost all others are very poor nations mostly bribed by Saudis to join the group, which are no relevant.

Iran was invited to join, wasn't it? Why didn't it?
You should also know that Egypt and the majority of the member countries don't stand against Iran. Egypt has conflicted with Saudiya on that matter quite a bit, and that includes its stand on Syria as well.

So the idea that this entire thing is formed to counter Iran is frankly silly.
 
.
So much for brotherhood, right? The point is, in case you missed it, is that the member quoted is always bitching about all the other Arab countries being traitors and what's his doing now?

Well... Some in the GCC back in the days were supporters of the islamic gov... that after losing the elction..perperted Mass killing and till this day are active... I don't say it's directly funded by them...but back int he days they supported that gov...
As for Brotherhood... well... Giving your money and maybe life to protect a group of ppl who till this day supported directly or inderectly via ideologies or money those who killed thousands of ppl... is questionable...
As for Some Arab countries being traitors...that is questionable also... Those GCC are not angels either ..Quite the opposite. ( neither a good part of this alliance either)

In the End...whatever they are right or wrong..; it's their choice. and tbh, they already hve problems in their countries... with terro... they will not spend any more "support" to fight someone else mess...

As for this alliance... I..myself doubt it's meaning and his capacity to answer problems...when even btw them they are not entirely alligned...

Many Question is still needed to be answered... Are they going to fight by sending boots where tero is? Will thisnew group be used in Yemen to continue their mess? Will they help funding states of this alliance to buy new equipment or else to help them fight it in thir own lands alone? or is it just a political stunt...saying " Here we are? and you? Where are you and with who?"

I have my share of opinion on it also...

As you can see also..; the alliance is quite centric... where are the north central Asian countries? per exemple? or Indonesia? etc...

And most countries have not the logictics, neither equipment to take part on any fronts outside of their lands.. like Tunisia per exemple... she doesn't have enought for hers let alone to send away...

But i think the most important point is the lack of Doctrine and Ideology behind it... and Fighting Terrorism is not one of them... it' s just a result of smthing/someone... but not that "Smthing/one"
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom