What's new

SAUDI ARABIA PATENTED ISLAM

Sorry Muslims are Muslims because follow Islam. You can't separate them you need to stop coming up with hilarious thing.

Where did I say they are not Muslims? There is subtle but fundamental differance in having a country for Muslims and a country for Islam.

You didn't reply to his post there, instead of refuting any of what he claimed, you side tracked the conversation. :rolleyes:

Answer one question, Why haven't land reforms taken place in Pakistan till date?

How is one answer to the question you posit going to prove anything? Many countries have failed to implement land reforms. Others saw communism reforming everything. Others still followed the middle path etc.
 
.
Patent means owning the rights....Now other muslims country have to bought licence from them?
 
.
Where did I say they are not Muslims? There is subtle but fundamental differance in having a country for Muslims and a country for Islam.



How is one answer to the question you posit going to prove anything? Many countries have failed to implement land reforms. Others saw communism reforming everything. Others still followed the middle path etc.
No Sir their isn't the moment you say you want to make country for Muslims you would be stupid to assume that question of Islam will never rise. You can't separate both that is not going to happen and never gonna work.
 
.
No, I know on the surface both statements appear to be two faces of the same coin but there is a differance, a fundamental differance.

1. To keep it simple a country for "Muslims" will focus on the improvement of "those Muslims" as such that are behind the cause - howsoever defined. . Such a country will in effect focus on the said body of Muslims and extend their social, economic development as it's primary goal. This falls more within the meaning of state as defined by the Westphalian model.

2. However if a country is for "Islam" then it primarily becomes a religious state and citadel of Islam that advances Islam and Islamic cause. In this case it's responsibility is NOT just to the Muslims that live within it's borders but equally also ALL Muslim all over the Islamic world. In this it will proceed and act in the interest of the Islam and the Islamic world. The said state will be as animated as in the cause of all of the Islamic world. One simple corollery of this is every Muslim in the entire Islamic world would have right to move to this state. This could be concieved as a proto caliphate.

Pakistan falls in category 1 however other states like Isreal fall ( for Jews ) in category 2 as you will notice it will allow any Jew from anywhere on earth to move to Isreal. The applicant for Isreali citizenship could be black, white, brown, yellow speak any language be from anywhere and they have to prove is they are Jew and they will be allowed inside.

Pakistan on the other hand does not allow any Muslim from the entire Islamic world to move to Pakistan thus it falls in category 1. I hope you understood my point.
 
Last edited:
.
Where did I say they are not Muslims? There is subtle but fundamental differance in having a country for Muslims and a country for Islam.
Pakistan is a country created to be the fortress of Islam, only country in the World to do so. If it had been for Muslims only, then why did Jinnah want it to be secular ?
How is one answer to the question you posit going to prove anything? Many countries have failed to implement land reforms. Others saw communism reforming everything. Others still followed the middle path etc.

Try answering my questions, don't side step. These are genuine questions Pakistan needs to answer before it can move forward.
 
.
How is one answer to the question you posit going to prove anything? Many countries have failed to implement land reforms. Others saw communism reforming everything. Others still followed the middle path etc.

It was in context with @nForce post #24, particularly to the point, "Pakistan was created mainly to appease the elites and landlords within Muslim society who simply could not take the idea that they will have to compete on a common ground, no preferential treatments."
 
.
And stop twisting history. Pakistan was created for emancipated Muslims from the legacy of British Raj
Not true. Pakistan was created as Muslims of Indian Subcontinent hated Pagan culture and feared an adulteration in their religion/culture by living in a Hindu majority country. Now don't start creating your own history.
 
.
The reason for the creation of India was to make profit for some middle class English merchants.

Shots fired lol. In all honesty though India is here because of the Brits, Pakistanis fought for Pakistan, Indians didn't had to do anything, they got a huge diverse part of sub continent gift packed by Brits to them. Today Europeans see India as nothing other then a cheap labour for call centres and pawn against China. That's it. That is the value of India in front of the British ruling elite.
 
.
Shots fired lol. In all honesty though India is here because of the Brits, Pakistanis fought for Pakistan, Indians didn't had to do anything, they got a huge diverse part of sub continent gift packed by Brits to them. Today Europeans see India as nothing other then a cheap labour for call centres and pawn against China. That's it. That is the value of India in front of the British ruling elite.
:rofl: Oh .. It just means we Indians are worthless people. So why are Pakistanis so worried about India after all we are just some bunch of cowardly people. Since Pakistanis fought heroically for freedom it just means the whole of Indian sub Continent belongs to the brave Pakistanis not to cowardly Indians like me who did nothing. I say you Pakistanis must immediately invade India and make it an Islamic land. After all your heroic Muslim league leaders in 1940's wanted to make the newly created Pakistan a platform to destroy the Pagans and wanted to make whole of South Asia Islamic and united as a single entity.
 
Last edited:
.
common man lets think

Democrite.JPG
 
.
Not true. Pakistan was created as Muslims of Indian Subcontinent hated Pagan culture and feared an adulteration in their religion/culture by living in a Hindu majority country. Now don't start creating your own history.
It does look like tipana boy talking..!:astagh:
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom