What's new

Saudi Arabia has paid $500M toward the cost of US troops in country

dBSPL

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 2, 2018
Messages
7,661
Reaction score
28
Country
Turkey
Location
Turkey
Saudi Arabia has paid $500M toward the cost of US troops in country

By Barbara Starr, CNN Pentagon Correspondent
Updated 0003 GMT (0803 HKT) January 17, 2020


Washington (CNN) -- Saudi Arabia has paid the US approximately $500 million to begin to cover the cost of US troops operating in the country, according to a US official.
191012050207-us-troops-saudi-arabia-syria-iran-middle-east-chance-lklv-nr-vpx-00004103-large-169.jpg

The payment was made in December last year. President Donald Trump asserted last week in an interview with Fox News that Saudi Arabia had "already deposited $1 billion in the bank."
Earlier this week the Pentagon could not confirm that any payment had been made.
This is not the first time the Saudis have contributed to cover US military costs. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and other Gulf states paid $36 billion towards the costs of the Gulf War in 1990-91.

Bilateral talks are ongoing over precisely what expenses will be covered by the Saudis. That decision will lead to a final calculation on what the US believes the Saudis owe.

"Consistent with the President's guidance to increase partner burden-sharing, the Department of Defense has engaged Saudi Arabia on sharing the cost of these deployments, which support regional security and dissuade hostility and aggression. The Saudi government has agreed to help underwrite the cost of these activities and has made the first contribution," said Cmdr. Rebecca Rebarich, Pentagon spokeswoman. "Discussions are ongoing to formalize a mechanism for future contributions that offset the cost of these deployments."
The US has deployed thousands of additional US troops and missile defense batteries to Saudi Arabia in response to what Pentagon officials have said is an increased threat from Iran.
The Saudi funds are to cover the overall costs of deploying troops, as well as fighter jets and Patriot missile defense batteries to protect Saudi oil installations from Iranian missile and drone attacks. The deployments began after what the Saudis said were Iranian attacks on oil facilities in September 2019.
The Saudi embassy in Washington did not respond to CNN's request for comment.
The US and several European nations blamed Iran for a missile attack that targeted Saudi energy facilities temporarily affecting the country's ability to produce oil.
The military buildup has come despite Trump repeatedly claiming that he wants to reduce the US military commitment in the Middle East, a pledge that he cited when he ordered the reduction of US troops in Syria, a move that received broad bipartisan opposition in Congress, as many lawmakers see it as an abandonment of America's partner in the fight against ISIS, the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces.


Barr and Pompeo shift justification for Iran strike from 'imminent' threat to deterrence

"In response to elevated threats in the Middle East over the past eight months, the Department of Defense has deployed U.S. military forces to the region to enhance U.S. defenses and augment Saudi air and missile defense of critical military and civilian infrastructure," Rebarich said.
The ongoing discussions with the Saudis are aimed at formalizing a mechanism for future payments to offset the costs of deployments. But the Pentagon is insisting that future payments will not necessarily lead to the deployment of additional forces or taking on additional military missions.
Separately Saudi Arabia has partially reimbursed the US for the cost of aerial refueling operations that the US military provided to Saudi warplanes, according to the US official.
The US stopped providing aerial refueling to Saudi jets participating in its campaign against Houthi rebels in Yemen in November of 2018.
In December of 2018 the US military said it was seeking a $331 million reimbursement from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates after discovering it had failed to properly charge the Saudi-led coalition fighting in Yemen for aerial refueling services.
The US official said payments were made last year with the full amount likely to be paid soon.

CNN's Ryan Browne contributed to this report.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/16/politics/saudi-arabia-us-troops-payment/index.html
 
.
Yes,one most pay ones yearly tribute to ones overlord,or ones protection money to ones gangster "protector",because if one does not,then "unpleasant" things may happen.
One would`ve thought that the ongoing huge purchases of weapons by saudi and the other persian gulf states,weapons that they dont need and cant use,would`ve been payback enough for the us,but thats the thing with gangsters,it doesnt matter if they`re small time street thugs or a street thug wearing an expensive tailored suit sitting at a desk in a presidents office,the one thing that they all have in common is that they`re all very,very greedy.......especially if they`ve got some nice fat pigeons like the saudis and co to pluck.
 
.
Yes,one most pay ones yearly tribute to ones overlord,or ones protection money to ones gangster "protector",because if one does not,then "unpleasant" things may happen.
One would`ve thought that the ongoing huge purchases of weapons by saudi and the other persian gulf states,weapons that they dont need and cant use,would`ve been payback enough for the us,but thats the thing with gangsters,it doesnt matter if they`re small time street thugs or a street thug wearing an expensive tailored suit sitting at a desk in a presidents office,the one thing that they all have in common is that they`re all very,very greedy.......especially if they`ve got some nice fat pigeons like the saudis and co to pluck.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protectorate
 
.
Well if they need protection they need to pay for it.

Thats one thing ill rather support trump on, oh and btw NATO needs to start carrying some of that burden as well. Enough freeloading!
 
.
@Slav Defence

Brother, here we have another example of the behaviour that I was talking about from that individual.

A thread created based on a mere rumor that the Pentagon has already denied.

“Earlier this week the Pentagon could not confirm that any payment had been made.”

The KSA-USA relationship is that of equals. KSA has had a large trade surplus with the US each year in the past 40 years. The US has hosted over 1 million Saudi Arabian residents in the past 30 years. Leading US firms are present in KSA and vice versa. KSA has huge stocks in leading US firms, property and there is ever growing ToT on numerous fields such as technology, military, science etc. Counter-terrorism and intelligence is another important field of cooperation.

Anyway this is ironic coming from a user that flags a country flag (Turkey) that hosts a US base, pays 2.5% of its GDP annually to NATO (another name for the US which runs this club) and which owes its entire existence after WW2 to the US for saving it from becoming a USSR republic or satelite state.

We all remember Brunson, Gulen sitting nicely in the US, open support to SDA and YPG next to the Turkish border and the crippling US sanctions that ruined the vulnerable Turkish economy overnight.

On the other hand we all saw how KSA handled 9/11, Kashhoggi etc. in comparison. Or even our deal with Russia on the S400 with the Americans being quite. Or our strategic relationship with China. List is very long.



Not sure whether to cry or laugh.

Yes,one most pay ones yearly tribute to ones overlord,or ones protection money to ones gangster "protector",because if one does not,then "unpleasant" things may happen.
One would`ve thought that the ongoing huge purchases of weapons by saudi and the other persian gulf states,weapons that they dont need and cant use,would`ve been payback enough for the us,but thats the thing with gangsters,it doesnt matter if they`re small time street thugs or a street thug wearing an expensive tailored suit sitting at a desk in a presidents office,the one thing that they all have in common is that they`re all very,very greedy.......especially if they`ve got some nice fat pigeons like the saudis and co to pluck.

Another genius in action with his fairytale stories and desperate projecting.

@Slav Defence

Well if they need protection they need to pay for it.

Thats one thing ill rather support trump on, oh and btw NATO needs to start carrying some of that burden as well. Enough freeloading!

You are confusing KSA for Japan and South Korea or Qatar. There has never been any such payments nor will there be unless KSA will be buying military equipment such as THAAD and other strategic weapons.

Actually Trump not many days ago called for enlarging NATO to incorporate KSA etc. That shows how out of touch he is given that KSA has no such interest.

 
.
.
giphy.gif

I suspect that the donald may just disagree with you on that score my friend.:omghaha:

The economic relations, relations on the ground, the US not acting against KSA interests and a huge sector of the American public complaining about KSA influence in the US and US foreign policy toying the Saudi Arabian line begs to differ.


Using your logic, no ally/partner of the US is an equal partner.


But you continue the moronic trolling. I can assure you that nobody in KSA cares nor the actual facts on the ground.
 
.
You are confusing KSA for Japan and South Korea or Qatar. There has never been any such payments nor will there be unless KSA will be buying military equipment such as THAAD and other strategic

Nope im not, japan was the classic case of checkbook Diplomacy, underwriting part of the 1991 war.

Ksa paid 30 billion plus in war costs, and hell yeah they should have, we saved their asses from Saddam, you dont wanna pay, then fucking do your fighting yourself, although its not something you can do, so just pay us we will fight your wars..

Sad but true sigh..
 
.
Nope im not, japan was the classic case of checkbook Diplomacy, underwriting part of the 1991 war.

Ksa paid 30 billion plus in war costs, and hell yeah they should have, we saved their asses from Saddam, you dont wanna pay, then fucking do your fighting yourself, although its something you can do, so just pay us we will fight your wars..

Sad but true sigh..

1990-1991 was 30 years ago and if you recall it was to liberate small Kuwait not KSA which no regional country can conquer (lol) nor could 30 years ago when KSA was 100 times weaker. Might as well talk about year 1250 when Arabs controlled a landmass streching from Southern France to Western China.

KSA is not fighting any wars other than a role on the sidelines in Yemen where US support WAS (no longer the case after KSA took everything over) limited to logistics.

And let us not pretend that the US was not the one to initiate the Gulf War. It would have occured either way and KSA and Kuwait contributed an overall small sum compared to what the potential war damages would have costed. This is called being smart.

Similar to Trump likely throwing a fist should KSA invade Qatar tomorrow morning.....
 
.
Wth? @ArabianEmpires&Caliphates

CNN entered this news a few hours ago. It also still continues to broadcast on international channel. What exactly do you want from us? Should we present to a delegation from KSA before the share here? Or Should all content containing KSA be banned in PDF? Then you're going to tell us tales in Aliice wonderland, which has nothing to do with a defense forum? Whatever we write against KSA, you always attack racially and slander us as trolls. Sorry but this is not the MBS's forum. Please be reasonable. If you see something wrong in this news, please correct so.
 
.
Okay, i hear a lot of excuses, but lets start from 1991, 30 years ago you needed USA help and gave us your airbases and ground support to invade iraq.

More recently we had to save your asses from Iranian houthis getting our own ship attacked in the process(uss Mason btw where I have had the honor of being positioned on).

So dont go 1250 AD on me telling me we did nothing for you, the least of which you could do is repay money for it.
Arabs can smoke a hukkah and ride a camel for all I care, but we are allies in that region and we've saved your asses more than once, so be a little respectful always!



1990-1991 was 30 years ago and if you recall it was to liberate small Kuwait not KSA which no regional country can conquer (lol) nor could 30 years ago when KSA was 100 times weaker. Might as well talk about year 1250 when Arabs controlled a landmass streching from Southern France to Western China.

KSA is not fighting any wars other than a role on the sidelines in Yemen where US support WAS (no longer the case after KSA took everything over) limited to logistics.

And let us not pretend that the US was not the one to initiate the Gulf War. It would have occured either way and KSA and Kuwait contributed an overall small sum compared to what the potential war damages would have costed. This is called being smart.

Similar to Trump likely throwing a fist should KSA invade Qatar tomorrow morning.....
 
.
giphy.gif

I suspect that the donald may just disagree with you on that score my friend.:omghaha:


You should probably do both,laugh at your own naivety for believing in such nonsense while crying at the bitter reality of your own vassalage. :laughcry:
Please back up your comments with authentic reference.
Regards
 
. .
Okay, i hear a lot of excuses, but lets start from 1991, 30 years ago you needed USA help and gave us your airbases and ground support to invade iraq.

More recently we had to save your asses from Iranian houthis getting our own ship attacked in the process(uss Mason btw where I have had the honor of being positioned on).

So dont go 1250 AD on me telling me we did nothing for you, the least of which you could do is repay money for it.
Arabs can smoke a hukkah and ride a camel for all I care, but we are allies in that region and we've saved your asses more than once, so be a little respectful always!

So what? It was in the interests of KSA to remove a hostile actor from Kuwait. All parties won economically, militarily and economically.

What are you blabbering about? No Saudi Arabian ship was attacked.

What are you blabbering about again my Indian friend? We are partners and there is nothing to thank for. The Gulf War was about Kuwait and was a joint operation that would not have went as smoothly without KSA involvement.

And once again events 30 years ago are irrelevant and no longer relevant. Hence the 1250 example.

KSA and the US relationship is doing fine for now. We will see what the future will bring but recent developments are clear, KSA is looking more and more towards China (our largest trade partner and key strategic military ally), Russia, Europe, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Pakistan, Arab world etc.

However I predict that ties will remain close, KSA is far too important for the US to lose it and vice versa.

Wth? @ArabianEmpires&Caliphates

CNN entered this news a few hours ago. It also still continues to broadcast on international channel. What exactly do you want from us? Should we present to a delegation from KSA before the share here? Or Should all content containing KSA be banned in PDF? Then you're going to tell us tales in Aliice wonderland, which has nothing to do with a defense forum? Whatever we write against KSA, you always attack racially and slander us as trolls. Sorry but this is not the MBS's forum. Please be reasonable. If you see something wrong in this news, please correct so.

It seems that you have problems with comprehending English. Let me refresh your memory again.

Earlier this week the Pentagon could not confirm that any payment had been made.”

The KSA-USA relationship is that of equals. KSA has had a large trade surplus with the US each year in the past 40 years. The US has hosted over 1 million Saudi Arabian residents in the past 30 years. Leading US firms are present in KSA and vice versa. KSA has huge stocks in leading US firms, property and there is ever growing ToT on numerous fields such as technology, military, science etc. Counter-terrorism and intelligence is another important field of cooperation.

Anyway this is ironic coming from a user that flags a country flag (Turkey) that hosts a US base, pays 2.5% of its GDP annually to NATO (another name for the US which runs this club) and which owes its entire existence after WW2 to the US for saving it from becoming a USSR republic or satelite state.

We all remember Brunson, Gulen sitting nicely in the US, open support to SDA and YPG next to the Turkish border and the crippling US sanctions that ruined the vulnerable Turkish economy overnight.

On the other hand we all saw how KSA handled 9/11, Kashhoggi etc. in comparison. Or even our deal with Russia on the S400 with the Americans being quite. Or our strategic relationship with China. List is very long.

Anyway no point discussing with kids.
 
.
So what? Not much buddy except that we had to save your asses AGAIN, so a thank you and some billions would be ok :lol:

Oh and that part about no Saudi ship being attacked, that just made me laugh..Of fuckin course you wont be attacked if you dont show up to a fight. Just stay in your bases and we will do the figting for you, given that you keep paying us some of that oil. :lol:

We are allies remember ;)
So what? It was in the interests of KSA to remove a hostile actor from Kuwait. All parties won economically, militarily and economically.

What are you blabbering about? No Saudi Arabian ship was attacked.

What are you blabbering about again my Indian friend? We are partners and there is nothing to thank for. The Gulf War was about Kuwait and was a joint operation that would not have went as smoothly without KSA involvement.

And once again events 30 years ago are irrelevant and no longer relevant. Hence the 1250 example.

KSA and the US relationship is doing fine for now. We will see what the future will bring but recent developments are clear, KSA is looking more and more towards China (our largest trade partner and key strategic military ally), Russia, Europe, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Pakistan, Arab world etc.

However I predict that ties will remain close, KSA is far too important for the US to lose it and vice versa.



It seems that you have problems with comprehending English. Let me refresh your memory again.

Earlier this week the Pentagon could not confirm that any payment had been made.”

The KSA-USA relationship is that of equals. KSA has had a large trade surplus with the US each year in the past 40 years. The US has hosted over 1 million Saudi Arabian residents in the past 30 years. Leading US firms are present in KSA and vice versa. KSA has huge stocks in leading US firms, property and there is ever growing ToT on numerous fields such as technology, military, science etc. Counter-terrorism and intelligence is another important field of cooperation.

Anyway this is ironic coming from a user that flags a country flag (Turkey) that hosts a US base, pays 2.5% of its GDP annually to NATO (another name for the US which runs this club) and which owes its entire existence after WW2 to the US for saving it from becoming a USSR republic or satelite state.

We all remember Brunson, Gulen sitting nicely in the US, open support to SDA and YPG next to the Turkish border and the crippling US sanctions that ruined the vulnerable Turkish economy overnight.

On the other hand we all saw how KSA handled 9/11, Kashhoggi etc. in comparison. Or even our deal with Russia on the S400 with the Americans being quite. Or our strategic relationship with China. List is very long.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom