What's new

Saudi Arabia changes Ottoman ‘Empire’ to ‘occupation’ in school textbooks

bro its not negatives but anger about the miss the industrial revolution,Matbaa issue,burning to rasathane of Takiyyuddin.. etc all of these books mentioned this events

Ultra conservatism not just plagued the Ottoman empire it plagued most Islamic Empires.

Examples can also be seen in China, Korea and Japan.
 
.
infact saudi'z are occupational forces. and divders of muslim empire. real empire was under ottomons though weak but still it was a true muslim empire .

saudiz , syrians , turks, pakistaniz, iraniz, indians these are all nationalists now. no muslims or muslim ummah.

ottomans were the last muslims.

sharifain of Arabia should be made leaders and under their leadership borders between all musim nations should be deleted. and one single Gold currency applied with one single Army and command.

police and instuttions can remain the same. the countries would be like mega states like in united states. while as a whole we would be United States of Islam.

wishful i know but one day By God this will happen. if not by our generation perhaps the next or the one after that. but i hope i can see it with my own eyes. ofcourse alot of false muslims have to die first.

Why would a non-Arab Muslim from a sovereign country go under the leadership of Arabs?
 
. .
What bothers me most is that when there is a dispute among Muslim states, instead of staying impartial, everyone quickly takes sides.

But when it comes to a legitimate cause of Muslims against Mushriks (Like Kashmir) and time to take sides, everyone backs off citing global socio-economic ties and urges for restraint and peace.
 
.
It is not new at all. This is exactly what British fed Arabs to revolt against Ottomans... that they're occupied by an empire. Arab nationalism of the following years was in all parts fed by this hate of Ottomans. They're secular and nationalist, today both of these a dying their natural death. Saudi Arabia has been a patron of Arab nationalism for a long time... So, it is about time they change their books to reflect the propaganda sowed for over a century.
 
.
Yes it belongs to them because Qaaba is in Arabia
Muslims from around the world can visit the place
You saying that a 19th century nomadic group from Riyadh has more say over Ka'ba? Do you even know history? The Sharif of Mecca the actual Quraish left Hijaz due to these guys forcibly taking it over and his sons became kings of both Jordan and Iraq. Only Jordanian kingdom continues to this day. Besides, Saudis only did it to have strong bargaining position with British so they can carve maximum land they can call "Saudi" Arabia...
 
. . . . .
Screw these Anglo Saxon imposed puppets Arabs are joke yes the Turks have their own national interests and policies I may not agree with but these petro oily sheikhs are the worst thing to ever happen to the Modern day Muslim world and Middle East
 
. . .
Makkah and Quresh

I don't care about your opinion nor about your whims and whatever slave mentality you have.. I was gonna give you a hard message but I leave it..

Our prophet didn't care about someone being white brown black red or yellow.. Saying it belongs to all Muslims is right and anything else is batıl falsehood

With your logic others would accept if mecca would fall into the hands of the jews but than I bet you would call to defend it.. But

But not because of it belongs to the Muslims huh? Than things would change and it would temporary belong to the Muslims until the job is done.. The finest art of backstabbing
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom