Our society generally loves Arabs. Until the social problems posed by 4 million Syrian refugees arose, this type issues was not even open to debate.
It is a very primitive example of racism to base the origin of everything and the cause of all good in your nation. I am not someone who has enough time to waste time with this understanding, but I will correct some of your errors.
Arab culture have no damaged while in Turkish rule , from Egypt, Algeria, Levand to Yemen. The Turkish navy prevented the spread of Spanish-Portuguese inhumane reconquista policy into the African-Arab geography. The truth is, for centuries, the Turks have protected your proud culture.
Although our language is different, we did not try to delete your language and names. To say that Osmalıca is an Arabic dialect is an example of blind ignorance, I prefer never even get into that ...
The case is the use of the Arabic alphabet only. Let me give the following summary information about the foreign words entered into Turkish: There are approximately 120 thousand words in the official Turkish dictionary. 13 thousand words of foreign origin. The most important sources of these foreign words are French words with 5253 words, 5467 Arabic words and 1459 Persian words.
The reason why there are so many Arabic words is that we want to preserve the universal terminology of the principles and concepts of Islamic religion. In everyday conversation, more Persian words are used than Arabic.
***
But at the beginning of the story , In the battle of Malazgirt, the Kurds fought with us, but it is not known which Arab overlords jihad with us.
Tuğrul Bey saved the Abbasid caliph from death. While the Buhwayhis wanted to undermine the dignity and honor of the entire Sunni Islamic world, the Arabs found only Turks stands with them. not a single Baduin but turks, and for this reason Tugrul bey has taken the title of the sword of Islam. His descendants carried this precious heritage with honor. Tolunoğulları, or Zengiler, or tons of any other Turkic dynasties at Levand and mezapotamia or Egypt, Turks were able to live in harmony with the Arabs and as required by Islam. That is why the Levant geography and mesopotamia were ruled by the Turks for nearly 1000 years.
Even though we had a different social order, the moral order we brought from Central Asia was consistent with the tolerance of Islam.
Without having sufficient information about the Seljuk period and the migration of Oghuz tribes to Anatolia, all the propositions about the ethnic identity of the region will be inaccurate. I recommend you to read the notes of the 12th century famous Arab traveler Abu'l-Fida about the ethnic identity of Anatolia. He mentions Turkmen obas with 100,000 tents even in Denizli region. Denizli is a plateau region of Aegean region suitable for animal husbandry.
Another source is the 13th-century Marco Polo map. Marco Polo calls Anatolia as Turcomania in his map and states that the dominant ethnic structure is composed of Turks.
***
If we talking about Ottomans , After the its first century, the Ottoman Empire was not a nation-state. Particularly, it was intertwined with the Balkan states, followed by Arabs and Kurds. Fatih Mehmed was called Kayzer because his ancestor Orhan Bey's wife was the daughter of the Eastern Roman Emperor.
Evaluating Ottomans as fake-simulated state , which has spread over 3 continents, which its first ascending is the Balkan region, and ruled for 700 years, is another indicator of your level of knowledge. Not just Ottomans, Turks took Islam to the east and west, to places where the Arab tribes could not even imagine.
After the Arabs expulsion of the Iberian peninsula, (which is the Arabs' biggest success in serving Islam) the Turks prevented the spread of Spanish and Portuguese to Africa.
The Ottoman state became an empire with the 15th century. The Persian influence can be mentioned more than the Arab influence. After the first civil constitutional period(around 19. century), the French influence was dominant.
Even when the Ottoman Empire expanded in the Middle East, it did so by destroying other Turkish states, not the Arab states.
***
This is what Europe in need of new geographical discoveries, starting from the Crusades to the 18th century, which could not cross the Turkish wall from the east or south or west.
This map represents the pinnacle of Islamic civilization. Moreover, even the Kazakh-Kalmuk-Uzbek power in Central Asia is not shown. If you can still live your religion freely, if you have preserved your culture and you have not assimilated like "Latin" America , you owe it to this map. It is only the ignorant words if anyone trying to insult the Turks' about contribution to Islamic civilization. So we must laugh and pass.
, but againg they are acting like lions against Turks pathetic dreamers....
