rockstar08
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 11,096
- Reaction score
- -16
- Country
- Location
Oh my God...not this again...this is why I have problem with you nationalists of all backgrounds. I'm off.
Not a Ummah lover like you
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh my God...not this again...this is why I have problem with you nationalists of all backgrounds. I'm off.
The credit goes to USA and Russia, some to Europe, Sunni and Shiite sectarianism is entering berserker mode.Stop giving credit to Iran my friend, trust me I know my people very well. This is not a fear of Iran. They can deal with Iran if they have political willingness to do so. Iran has no popular support in the region, only Shia's support it. We don't like Iran and see as sectarian country which has committed grave misdoings against the Sunni people. Iran wouldn't have gotten to where it was today had US not paved the way for it.
Announcing the creation of a 'military coalition' alone is not much more than good PR for the Saudis.
What really needs to be looked at are the details - how the 'coalition' defines 'terrorism' and 'fighting terrorism', what the process of ' determining that the definition of terrorism is being met' is, how the coalition determines that there is 'justification for military action by the coalition' and whether participation in any military effort (once the coalition has agreed that there is justification for military action under its rules) is 'binding' upon member States.
Even if the internal mechanisms of the 'coalition' become clear, how does the coalition ensure that military action by the coalition against another State is in accordance with the requirements of the UN Charter? Depending upon the substance of this 'coalition', NATO might offer lessons on structure, but I highly doubt this 'coalition' is going to be even remotely close to NATO in terms of the requirements placed upon member States.
The GCC States need to stop funding and supporting (directly or indirectly) Daesh, Al Nusra and end funding for extremist scholars, madrassas and mosques and support an end to Blasphemy laws and anti-Ahmadi laws to counter the argument you refer to.Or maybe to counter the argument that terrorism is islamic.
I agree, it's a PR gimmick. Have the Saudis and GCC ended funding for Daesh or Al Nusra or thousands of extremist scholars, mosques and madrassas around the world?I don't see it coming anytime soon, its just a stunt. 34 countries and who will invest ? Probably 2,3 or 4 ? Till when??
All these countries, well except for Turkey and Pakistan, are not capable of being self sufficient. They can't produce fighter jets, tanks, bombs, guns, or as a mater of fact, can't even train their armies.
Islamic Coalition my butt, I explained what it is about in the other main thread. If the governments of UAE and Egypt are taking part in it then it voids the Islamicness of it completely.
Pakestan and Turkey are building their own plans...hh.All these countries, well except for Turkey and Pakistan, are not capable of being self sufficient. They can't produce fighter jets, tanks, bombs, guns, or as a mater of fact, can't even train their armies.
Saudis are gone bezerk !! Pakistan must not join. We may consider if Iran is also part of it.
What about Yemen ?Prince Muhammad: The coalition will not work in Iraq and Syria without coordinating with the legitimacy or the international community.
How is the cold blooded massacring of innocent Shia, Yazidi and Sunnis by groups like Daesh, TTP, Lashkar-E-Jhangvi, Jundullah etc part of the process of 'resolving Palestine'?All militant organisations will keep coming if you don't resolve issue of Palestine.
Pakestan and Turkey are building their own plans...hh.
Turkey supports terrorism in Egypt ,Syria and Iraq.
Pakestan ....are the drones attacks by US that violate your land still going on or not.....so don't be so showy..
AQ Khan had also provided bomb and centrifuge designs to the Libyans and centrifuge designs to the NoKo's - Iran wasn't the only source of information against him and because of the Libyan and NoKo discoveries Pakistan was in fact cooperating with the IAEA about AQ Khan's other activities.Why? So Iran can backstab Pakistan again like when they handed over Pakistani centrifuge designs to the US which resulted in Pakistani Atomic scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan taking the fall for the military.
My thoughts exactly.What are goals and scope of this coalition? Or it's like OIC to arrange tea parties and issue statements?
I doubt think Iran will complain too much. Still, Pakistan needs to be careful, Iran is an immediate neighbor, KSA is a far off entity.Saudis are gone bezerk !! Pakistan must not join. We may consider if Iran is also part of it.