Sale of F-16 jets to Pakistan should not be of concern to India: US

[The Eagle]

You dont need to concern about that .Because your foreign policy is India centric .But for us we have different problem.
Our estalishments wont trust Pakistan

You forgot something here, it is not us to concern always but India is. India knows about our policy being India centric, is just the Indian thoughts that are not missing a single chance to oppose anything mentioning Pakistan or it can be called the feeling of insecurity unnecessarily otherwise India wouldn't the purchasing whatever is called weapon. Only a trustworthy will trust someone. These are just 8 F-16s for war against terrorism so it does not concerns India at all. So it is US-PAK deal, India shouldn't have any concern and that is what replied by US.

 

[SrNair]

You forgot something here, it is not us to concern always but India is. India knows about our policy being India centric, is just the Indian thoughts that are not missing a single chance to oppose anything mentioning Pakistan or it can be called the feeling of insecurity unnecessarily otherwise India wouldn't the purchasing whatever is called weapon. Only a trustworthy will trust someone. These are just 8 F-16s for war against terrorism so it does not concerns India at all. So it is US-PAK deal, India shouldn't have any concern and that is what replied by US.

Simple .We will always oppose if US gives you any advance stuff like this at the expense of US taxpayers money .If that was your own money .MEW wouldnt even care about that .

 

[Sipahi]

Simple .We will always oppose if US gives you any advance stuff like this at the expense of US taxpayers money .If that was your own money .MEW wouldnt even care about that .

Believe me that it will be the same response,

They are paying us CSF which is annual route tax, from which they are taking their food, equipments to afghanistan. You are more then welcome to provide them route and take all the 836 million USD, if you have one.

So technically that is our money and the rants about US tax money are irrelevent here.

 

[SrNair]

Believe me that it will be the same response,

They are paying us CSF which is annual route tax, from which they are taking their food, equipments to afghanistan. You are more then welcome to provide them route and take all the 836 million USD, if you have one.

So technically that is our money and the rants about US tax money are irrelevent here.

Or we have right to demand this money because we are allowing the donor nation to use our sovreign land for war in our neighbourhood .Good .
Sorry we dont need such money .We wont stoop to that level.

 

[Sipahi]

Or we have right to demand this money because we are allowing the donor nation to use our sovreign land for war in our neighbourhood .Good .
Sorry we dont need such money .We wont stoop to that level.

India voted in UN for WOT and you are equally responsible for Afghan destruction.

If China or US or even Bangladesh, use your road or air space, will India not charge them ??? You will let them go just like that ???

We have every right to demand from them because they are using our infrastructure.

We had suspended the route when US forces attacked Pakistani checkpost and the same was closed for 8 months till US apologize and then the route resume.

 

[Khafee]

You dont need to concern about that .Because your foreign policy is India centric .But for us we have different problem.
Our estalishments wont trust Pakistan.

Actually its the other way around, and King NaMo has proved that. In nearly every other foreign trip, if not every trip, he has been whining about Pakistan, either directly or indirectly.

Secondly, All the way from the Defence minister & the External Affairs minister, to the presstitutes, the whole country has been going nuts over 8 jets. Extremely pathetic, I must say.

So you claiming anything else reflects extremly badly on you. It would be best or you to resign from this thread, because the more you talk, the more you are undermining, your credibility. Best to call a spade, a spade, and quit!

 

[The Eagle]

Simple .We will always oppose if US gives you any advance stuff like this at the expense of US taxpayers money .If that was your own money .MEW wouldnt even care about that .

I can see there a pain indeed in India but all we can do is an advice to stop wasting Indian's taxpayers money for lobbying as it wouldn't help at all or either keep it on as India is on the right path, rather to care US money without any concern that India has been replied as well. Though F-16s are coming and are free.

 

[Khafee]

@Khafee @Neutron I might not have clear Idea, but can you please tell me that if India stop buying Arms and high tech systems from US, what will be the implications.

Thanks in advance.

@Maarkhor @The Eagle

Nothing, India will be the one loosing NOT the US.

 

[mingle]

Nothing, India will be the one loosing NOT the US.

I don't think they buy any high tech from US they mostly buy from Israel then France bulk Russia .they use these tenders for political gimmicks yanks knows that so they hit the nail right on head .

 

[Khafee]

I don't think they buy any high tech from US they mostly buy from Israel then France bulk Russia .they use these tenders for political gimmicks yanks knows that so they hit the nail right on head .

From what I have understood with my conversations with the Americans, "relationships, are more important than money".

 

[mingle]

From what I have understood with my conversations with the Americans, "relationships, are more important than money".

I agree with u but Indians play tricks with them I mean they buy which is not high tech but use as leverage againest Pak who dealing with yanks since it born .

 

[Khafee]

I agree with u but Indians play tricks with them I mean they buy which is not high tech but use as leverage againest Pak who dealing with yanks since it born .

Two sides to this. Congress and the Pentagon.

The Pentagon makes the final call, irrespective of what armchair generals & keyboard warriors like to fantasize here.

And we all know about what the Pentagon's preference is in South Asia

 

[Blue Marlin]

Two sides to this. Congress and the Pentagon.

The Pentagon makes the final call, irrespective of what armchair generals & keyboard warriors like to fantasize here.

And we all know about what the Pentagon's preference is in South Asia

what if congress says no hypotheticaly speaking.

 

[Khafee]

what if congress says no hypotheticaly speaking.

1) Then the Congressmen & Senators who are from Lockheed's constituency can expect a lot of heat.

2) They have to come up with a very valid reason for refusing an "INS" cert.

3) On the basis of an "INS" cert. the President can give the go ahead to the sale, if he wants to.

 

[Blue Marlin]

1) Then the Congressmen & Senators who are from Lockheed's constituency can expect a lot of heat.

2) They have to come up with a very valid reason for refusing an "INS" cert.

3) On the basis of an "INS" cert. the President can give the go ahead to the sale, if he wants to.

your firsto=point is the stronest reason why it will go through. dont mess with lm and it's f16's !

whats an ins cert?