India's Kakrapar-1 achieved critical in
1995, and was unplugged soon after due to a major accident and re-plugged earlier this year.
However , that India led the world to field such a
minor technology at a time
is very different from that India led the world in its tech. "
the early pioneer of the technology was U.S. physicist Alvin Weinberg at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee,
who helped develop a working nuclear plant [ read
THE FIRST] using liquid fuel in the
1960s. " ( source:
Thorium - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
Therefore, it is correct to say that the US developed the technology and India used it ( by collaborating with [read begging] the US researchers and /or with other means) firstly in a large trial.
This is because in nuclear field, as well as in all other major technology fields, India is decades and more away behind world leaders. It is, thereof, impossible that India leads here or there. Illogical and hence impossible.
Therefore whether India was the first to field such a thing or not has no significance. To claim that India was the first ( with the sinuation that it leads the rest of the world in the tech as we meant in above discuss context) is similar as to claim that Somalia desert fielded world's first QED Accelerator ( presumablely researched by the US /UK scientists instead of Somali pirates ? ) or as to claim that Porto Rico fielded the world's biggest (hence the "first", too) telescope, or world's deep-sea oil drill was first used in the shore of Indonesia ( "who got the tech to have done that?" ) , which has no meanng in either case, surely.
As for your world-leading Hot Air technology, one thing puzzles me that is your operational "AHWR" as
expected as your LCA , or as
expected as your Arjunk?