What's new

SAARC Reads Riot Act To Pakistan, Asks It To Pay Outstanding Contribution For SAU Or Get Out

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
Its awful that out of 8 members in SAARC only one nation fails to find $7 million dollars.

Pakistan wants to be treated seriously in this region it needs to stand up and be counted by paying up.

SAARC was set for the south Asian countires to promote trade and regional stability BUT Pakistan seems to want to take part but not pay a penny.
 
. .
Its awful that out of 8 members in SAARC only one nation fails to find $7 million dollars.

Pakistan wants to be treated seriously in this region it needs to stand up and be counted by paying up.

SAARC was set for the south Asian countires to promote trade and regional stability BUT Pakistan seems to want to take part but not pay a penny.

Pakistan is no longer in part of south asia. it has drifted and became part of middle east through CPEC.
 
.
And what are Indian contributions/commitments to Pakistan through SAARC?
If Pakistan pays this contribution, will he be able to send students there? and what are the living conditions awaiting them there in a declared enemy state by both sides? Does not make sense, does it?
 
Last edited:
.
And what are Indian contributions/commitment to Pakistan through SAARC?
If Pakistan pays this contribution, will hebe able to send students there? and what are the living conditions awaiting them there in a declared enemy state by both sides? Does not make sense, does it?

You are debating about ROI and if it makes sense or not? That should have been done before you gave a commitment.

Now India has a reason to kick Pakistan out of SAARC. Pakistan has to pay and stay put until India finds another reason to kick Pakistan out.
 
Last edited:
.
You are debating about ROI and if it makes sense or not? That should have been done before you gave a commitment.

Now India a reason to kick Pakistan out of SAARC. Pakistan has to pay and stay put until India finds another reason to kick Pakistan out.
Commitments are made in peace and through peace, when there is conflict they do not hold anymore.. bu you have not answered my question, all that you seem to long for is kicking Pakistan out of SAARC which power is not between your hands.. Pakistan will have nothing to lose if it decides to leave it, not for ~$8 million, but for the principle of logic..
 
.
Commitments are made in peace and through peace, when there is conflict they do not hold anymore.. bu you have not answered my question, all that you seem to long for is kicking Pakistan out of SAARC which power is not between your hands.. Pakistan will have nothing to lose if it decides to leave it, not for ~$8 million, but for the principle of logic..

If Pakistan does not loose anything by being out of SAARC why is it not leaving even after the humiliation of cancelling the SAARC summit in Pakistan? The reason is simple. Pakistan is in SAARC not for cooperating with other South Asian nations but to ensure South Asian nations do not cooperate with India.

Hence India will find every excuse to kick Pakistan out of SAARC which would result in SAARC becoming a functioning organization again.

It is in Pakistan's interest to keep negating all such excuses that India would find. In this case Pakistan has no other option but to pay. Whether Pakistan uses the facilities in India or not is immaterial.
 
.
.
If Pakistan does not loose anything by being out of SAARC why is it not leaving even after the humiliation of cancelling the SAARC summit in Pakistan? The reason is simple. Pakistan is in SAARC not for cooperating with other South Asian nations but to ensure South Asian nations do not cooperate with India.

Hence India will find every excuse to kick Pakistan out of SAARC which would result in SAARC becoming a functioning organization again.

It is in Pakistan's interest to keep negating all such excuses that India would find. In this case Pakistan has no other option but to pay. Whether Pakistan uses the facilities in India or not is immaterial.
"Pakistan is in SAARC not for cooperating with other South Asian nations but to ensure South Asian nations do not cooperate with India."
This has no logic to it, it is an argument for the sake of it..How can Pakistan, a member of SAARC wants to ensure South Asian nations do not cooperate with India?
The mather is; would there be a SAARC University in Pakistan where India commits to around $10 million to it, if the answer is yes than it should be a project of SAARC too, Pakistan needs it more than India does..
 
.
I think if we had promised them, we should live up to the promise and pay...We should fulfill our promise regardless of politics among South Asian nations..

This was during a time when Pakistan was trying to promote peace. But ever since India has threatened to cut our water supply off and launch it's Cold Start Doctrine, plans have changed.

Never vote against Pakistan? Let's recollect why they didn't end up in last saarc meet? Nepal in paticular warned Pakistan on terrorism right before the cancellation of the meet. No one needs to vote you out. Ur just not invited anymore if you don't pay. That's what riot act means.

Guys watch out for this guy. He will entice you into an argument calling you names. When you retaliate he will delete all his messages and report you. This one is a true troll and Anti-Pakistani.

South Asian Agency for regional cooperation.
Pretty ignorant for a admst.

South Asian Association! Obviously not as ignorant as you.

What is Pakistan? :D

Pakistan is the country that will return India to the former Princely States. :D

We shouldn't give these backstabbing instigators a penny until the Kashmir issue is resolved.
 
.
SAARC is a dead horse and it never had any utility so Pakistan should not pay a single penny to these idiots...We are part of middle east and establish our relations with nations at our level ... and stay away from idiots and tell them to get lost.
 
Last edited:
.
SAARC is a dead horse and it never had any utility so Pakistan should not a single penny to these idiots...We are part of middle east and establish our relations with nations at our level ... and stay away from idiots

SAARC has been obeying India like a lap dog so they should ask India to pay up..we dont need to spend on a dead horse...
 
.
Screenshot (153).png
 
.
"Pakistan is in SAARC not for cooperating with other South Asian nations but to ensure South Asian nations do not cooperate with India."
This has no logic to it, it is an argument for the sake of it..How can Pakistan, a member of SAARC wants to ensure South Asian nations do not cooperate with India?
The mather is; would there be a SAARC University in Pakistan where India commits to around $10 million to it, if the answer is yes than it should be a project of SAARC too, Pakistan needs it more than India does..

What do you say about this?

Pakistan throws spanner in SAARC road connectivity plans again
INDIA Updated: Mar 13, 2016 13:36 IST
default_author.png

saarc-summit_a09fe312-e8e5-11e5-93e5-5c9d844984a6.jpg

Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the 18th SAARC summit, held in Kathmandu from November 26 to 27, 2014. The 19th edition of the event will be held in Islamabad this year.(File Photo/HT)


Ahead of meetings to set the agenda for the next SAARC summit, Pakistan has decided to take it slow on an ambitious project to boost road connectivity in the subcontinent – showing yet again how issues between India and its neighbour continue to hold up the regional integration blueprint.

The motor vehicle pact aims to allow free movement of vehicles, both passenger and cargo, within member countries of SAARC (or the South Asian Association for Regional Corporation). However, both India and Pakistan have been taking turns to stall it at crucial junctures.

The SAARC nations – comprising India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Maldives and Sri Lanka – will meet in Kathmandu from March 14 to chalk out plans for the upcoming summit in Islamabad. The motor vehicle pact, however, will not be part of the agenda.


  • Pakistan had reportedly told India last month that it wanted the SAARC transport ministers’ postponed, so it could have some more time to consider it. “The sixth meeting of the SAARC inter-governmental group of transport was scheduled for February 15-16 in Kathmandu. This was to be followed by the transport ministers’ meeting, and we had given our consent. But now, Pakistan has requested that the meeting be postponed. This will further delay the signing of the connectivity pact,” said the source.

    Pakistan had earlier refused to sign the motor vehicle pact at the Kathmandu summit in November 2014.

    Founded in 1985, the eight-member SAARC remains one of the least integrated groupings in the world. Less than 5% of the region’s global trade takes place among member countries, and barely 10% of the region’s commerce is conducted in the SAARC Free Trade Area. “As the forum works on the basis of consensus, Pakistan’s request for postponement will again hold back new initiatives of the grouping,” an official said.

    With Pakistan delaying the motor vehicles pact, India had looked at boosting regional connectivity with its eastern neighbours – Nepal, Bhutan and Bangladesh – through a landmark agreement in June last year. But the deal, which paves the way for free movement of passengers as well as cargo through the four countries, is yet to become operational because its protocol is being finalised by member countries.
How SAARC satellite project fell prey to India-Pakistan rivalry
WORLD Updated: Mar 23, 2016 14:36 IST
20161122_DLI-VK-MN_Jayanth%20Jacob-004-khfG-U102103771319FsH-250x250@HT-Web.jpg

Jayanth Jacob
Hindustan Times
37th-saarc-council-pokhara-ministers-meeting-in_37958030-f0cd-11e5-ac5f-8ebef762d494.jpg

External affairs minister Sushma Swaraj at the 37th SAARC council of ministers meeting in Pokhara. (File Photo/PTI )

The deliberations held by South Asian countries at the Idyllic Nepalese town of Pokhara last week have yet again showed how India-Pakistan rivalry continues to impede the cause of regional integration.

After scuttling a long-awaited motor vehicle agreement, Pakistan clamped down on the SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) satellite project – a venture that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had announced at the 2014 Nepal SAARC summit as India’s gift to South Asia.

“SAARC is not a forum for taking up bilateral issues anymore. It doesn’t discuss issues like Kashmir. It has, instead, become a forum where bilateral nagging issues between India and Pakistan stall regional projects and ideas,” a South Asian diplomat said on the condition of anonymity.

The satellite project was meant to help countries in the fields of education, health and emergency communication during disasters. Pakistan, however, felt that it could be an attempt by India to access information on its vital installations and resources.

An Indian official involved with the project said that the allegation was unwarranted. “One can raise a political objection to anything. This is exactly what has happened here. It’s not as if countries like Bangladesh or Sri Lanka didn’t raise what they thought were genuine concerns. We engaged them on these issues and allayed their doubts. Pakistan was simply not interested in the project.”

  • “As Pakistan has decided to opt out of the satellite project, it cannot be called a SAARC satellite. It will be a South Asia satellite,” said external affairs ministry spokesperson Vikas Swarup.

    Thanks to the issues between India and Pakistan, two of its largest economies, SAARC remains one of the least integrated groupings in the world. The intra-regional trade in goods of the association – founded in 1985 – accounts for 5% of the total trade, as opposed to 26% among ASEAN (South East Asian) countries. Less than 10% of the region’s commerce is conducted in the SAARC Free Trade Area.

    The SAARC satellite project is the second in recent times to have gone the sub-regional way, after being projected as a signature venture for the subcontinent.

    After Pakistan refused to join the South Asian road connectivity initiative under the SAARC rubric, India bypassed the neighbouring country by forming a separate pact with Bangladesh, Bhutan and Nepal.

    The Pokhara talks were held in the run-up to the SAARC summit in Islamabad later this year
http://www.hindustantimes.com/world...pak-rivalry/story-wCiUSzx41DDJgeeO4TZNjM.html
 
Last edited:
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom