masud
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2015
- Messages
- 1,748
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
they do have the capability, but only problem is money............They dont have the capabilities/funds to build an aicraft carrier. It's just a dream.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
they do have the capability, but only problem is money............They dont have the capabilities/funds to build an aicraft carrier. It's just a dream.
Even if you have the technology equal or superior to someone else's technology - to gain access to them it means to strengthen your position.russia can built aircraft carier without any one,s help. but can,t built amphibious assault ship without the help from france. what a joke.............
Perhaps because the former Soviet aircraft carriers combines the functionality of a cruiser and an aircraft carrier.Why does the control towers on russian ships look bulky....
Most of the western ships control towers look sleek...
Even the recent Indian made aircraft carrier INS Vikrant looks sleek campared to INS Vikramaditya...
Any reasons?
that,s my motto.....................Even if you have the technology equal to or superior to someone else's technology - gain access to them it means to strengthen your position.
they do have the capability, but only problem is money............
the two are competely different things. Its like saying China can send people into space and build fighter jets by itself, but why hasnt it been able to build a successful operational large commercial plane/jets as of yet??lolrussia can built aircraft carier without any one,s help. but can,t built amphibious assault ship without the help from france. what a joke.............
INS VIKRANT control tower is sleek campared to INS Vikramaditya...
Is it something to worry about?
Or is there a technical reason to have bulky control towers?
The Kiev class is a combination of a cruiser and a carrier. In the Soviet Navy this class of ships was specifically designated as a heavy aviation cruiser rather than just an aircraft carrier.Although the ships were designed with an island superstructure to starboard, with a 2/3 length angled flight deck, the foredeck was taken up with the heavy missile armament. The intended mission of the Kiev class was support for strategic missile submarines, other surface ships and naval aviation; it was capable of engaging in anti-aircraft, anti-submarine and surface warfare.
Isn't it being built since 2004 ? Lel.
Russia orders second Ivan Gren-class landing ship - IHS Jane's 360 (16 October 2014)Ivan Gren , laid down in 2004, will finally be commissioned in 2015 after a troubled build programme
INS VIKRANT control tower is sleek campared to INS Vikramaditya...
Is it something to worry about?
Or is there a technical reason to have bulky control towers?
the two are competely different things. Its like saying China can send people into space and build fighter jets by itself, but why hasnt it been able to build a successful operational large commercial plane/jets as of yet??lol
I think many of you are confusing Russia with the Soviet union/U.S.S.R . They are not the same countries. Why do you think Russia will seek french help/tech transfer and be ready to fork out almost 2 billion dollars of its hard earn cash to buy/purchase mistral and key techs from France? Do you think they did it for charity or just for fun?lool If they can build one themeslef without any need of foreign help, then why did they seek french help in the first place???
Lol@levina ru russian?, just in case russian navy might have taken inspiration from you.
but am a Dravidan and not a Russian.
Now is it my fault that lavina means "avalanche" in Russian???
Now is it my fault that lavina means "avalanche" in Russian???
The warship has been deftly named.