What's new

Russia Welcomes China Peace Plan, Says It Is Open to Talks

Who said I love mass murder ? You are ignoring who is the original culprit of the problem, NATO, becos you resides there.
That’s the problem because you believe too much to propaganda shit. You should change the perspective and look from other side of the fence.

If you live next to a hooligan like Russia with a psychopath like Putin then you will seek protection.

Finland and Sweden get panicked that’s why they run into the NATO. You can argue the Nato expands into Finland and Sweden. Yes, that’s true, but why?

If Vietnam has Russia as neighbor we would join the Nato, too. 100 percent.
Or you think we wait until they come raping our women? Because we harass the Russian speaking people in Vietnam?

Ukraine is not in the NATO why Russia attacks Ukraine? That’s not logical.
 
.
No party is being completely transparent here

China says they are offering a plan for a just peace. What they really want is for the fighting to end and their ally Putin to be able to save face and continue to stay in power in Russia without having to support him militarily and risk further western sanctions on an already bruised Chinese economy.

Russia says it welcomes the Chinese plan. What Putin really means is that his battered army and economy need a breather and he needs to be able to present a victory to the Russian people to maintain the legitimacy of his regime.

Zelensky says he sees positives in the Chinese plan. What he really wants is for China to not start supplying weapons to Russia and, if possible, to convince Putin to vacate occupied Ukranian territory .

The West says China is not a honest broker and only Ukraine will decide under what terms it will make peace. While they would like to see the war end soon, they don't mind Russian military capacity being degraded without the involvement of NATO boots on the ground and would love to see the Russian people turn on Putin and a more pro-Western government in Moscow.
 
.
That’s the problem because you believe too much to propaganda shit. You should change the perspective and look from other side of the fence.

If you live next to a hooligan like Russia with a psychopath like Putin then you will seek protection.

Finland and Sweden get panicked that’s why they run into the NATO. You can argue the Nato expands into Finland and Sweden. Yes, that’s true, but why?

If Vietnam has Russia as neighbor we would join the Nato, too. 100 percent.
Or you think we wait until they come raping our women? Because we harass the Russian speaking people in Vietnam?

Ukraine is not in the NATO why Russia attacks Ukraine? That’s not logical.
I am talking about Ukraine war, it happened becos NATO wants to expand into Ukraine, dont be selective. Believe in what you want to believe.
 
Last edited:
.
A very interesting article on NY Times today. What is a bit shocking to me is that many Recommended comments to the article are saying to leave China alone in case of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan.


A major war in the Indo-Pacific is probably more likely now than at any other time since World War II.

The most probable spark is a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. President Xi Jinping of China has said unifying Taiwan with mainland China “must be achieved.” His Communist Party regime has become sufficiently strong — militarily, economically and industrially — to take Taiwan and directly challenge the United States for regional supremacy.

The United States has vital strategic interests at stake. A successful Chinese invasion of Taiwan would punch a hole in the U.S. and allied chain of defenses in the region, seriously undermining America’s strategic position in the Western Pacific, and would probably cut off U.S. access to world-leading semiconductors and other critical components manufactured in Taiwan. As president, Joe Biden has stated repeatedly that he would defend Taiwan.

But leaders in Washington also need to avoid stumbling carelessly into a war with China because it would be unlike anything ever faced by Americans. U.S. citizens have grown accustomed to sending their military off to fight far from home. But China is a different kind of foe — a military, economic and technological power capable of making a war felt in the American homeland.

As a career strategic analyst and defense planner, including for Australia’s Defense Department, I have spent decades studying how a war could start, how it would play out and the military and nonmilitary operations that China is prepared to conduct. I am convinced that the challenges facing the United States are serious, and its citizens need to become better aware of them.

The military scenario alone is daunting: China would probably launch a lightning air, sea and cyber assault to seize control of key strategic targets on Taiwan within hours, before the United States and its allies could intervene. Taiwan is slightly bigger than the state of Maryland; if you recall how quickly Afghanistan and Kabul fell to the Taliban in 2021, you start to realize that the takeover of Taiwan could happen relatively quickly. China also has more than 1,350 ballistic and cruise missiles poised to strike U.S. and allied forces in Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and American-held territories in the Western Pacific. Then there’s the sheer difficulty the United States would face waging war thousands of miles across the Pacific against an adversary that has the world’s largest navy and Asia’s biggest air force.

Despite this, U.S. military planners would prefer to fight a conventional war. But the Chinese are prepared to wage a much broader type of warfare that would reach deep into American society.

Over the past decade, China has increasingly viewed the United States as mired in political and social crises. Mr. Xi, who likes to say that “the East is rising while the West is declining,” evidently feels that America’s greatest weakness is on its home front. And I believe he is ready to exploit this with a multipronged campaign to divide Americans and undermine and exhaust their will to engage in a prolonged conflict — what China’s military calls enemy disintegration.

Over the past two decades, China has built a formidable cyberwarfare capability designed to penetrate, manipulate and disrupt the United States and allied governments, media organizations, businesses and civil society. If war were to break out, China can be expected to use this to disrupt communications and spread fake news and other disinformation. The aim would be to foster confusion, division and distrust and hinder decision making. China might compound this with electronic and probably some physical attacks on satellites or related infrastructure.



These operations would most likely be accompanied by cyber offensives to disrupt electricity, gas, water, transport, health care and other public services. China has demonstrated its capabilities already, including in Taiwan, where it has waged disinformation campaigns, and in serious hacking incidents in the United States. Mr. Xi has championed such subterfuge as a “magic weapon.”

China could also weaponize its dominance of supply chains and shipping. The impact on Americans would be profound.

The U.S. economy is heavily dependent on Chinese resources and manufactured goods, including many with military applications, and American consumers rely on moderately priced Chinese-made imports for everything from electronics to furniture to shoes. The bulk of these goods is transported aboard ships along sea lanes increasingly controlled by Chinese commercial interests that are ultimately answerable to China’s party-state. A war would halt this trade (as well as American and allied shipments to China).

U.S. supplies of many products could soon run low, paralyzing a vast range of businesses. It could take months to restore trade, and emergency rationing of some items would be needed. Inflation and unemployment would surge, especially in the period in which the economy is repurposed for the war effort, which might include some automobile manufacturers switching to building aircraft or food-processing companies converting to production of priority pharmaceuticals. Stock exchanges in the United States and other countries might temporarily halt trading because of the enormous economic uncertainties.

The United States might be forced to confront the shocking realization that the industrial muscle instrumental in victories like that in World War II — President Franklin Roosevelt’s concept of America as “the arsenal of democracy” — has withered and been surpassed by China.

China is now the dominant global industrial power by many measures. In 2004 U.S. manufacturing output was more than twice China’s; in 2021, China’s output was double that of the United States. China produces more ships, steel and smartphones than any other country and is a world leader in the production of chemicals, metals, heavy industrial equipment and electronics — the basic building blocks of a military-industrial economy.

Critically, the United States is no longer able to outproduce China in advanced weapons and other supplies needed in a war, which the current one in Ukraine has made clear. Provision of military hardware to Kyiv has depleted American stocks of some key military systems. Rebuilding them could take years. Yet the war in Ukraine is relatively small-scale compared with the likely demands of a major war in the Indo-Pacific.

So what needs to be done?

On the military front, the United States should accelerate programs already underway to strengthen and disperse American forces in the Western Pacific to make them less vulnerable to attacks by China. At home, a concerted effort must be made to find ways to better protect U.S. traditional and social media against Chinese disinformation. Supply chains of some critical goods and services need to be reconfigured to shift production to the United States or allied nations, and the United States must pursue a longer-term strategic drive to restore its dominance in global manufacturing.

Building a stronger deterrence by addressing such weaknesses is the best means of averting war. But this will take time. Until then, it is important for Washington to avoid provocations and maintain a civil discourse with Beijing.

The high-altitude balloon that drifted across the United States this month was seen by many Americans as a shocking Chinese breach of U.S. sovereignty. It may turn out to be child’s play compared with the havoc China could wreak on the American homeland in a war.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And while many highly Recommended comments are for avoiding a conflict with China, this one is intriguing.



It would be very difficult to rescue Taiwan from a powerful military located so close to its shores. So the USA and our allies should plan on a different approach. For a start: Cancel all debts owed China from the US and our allies. Confiscate or Blockade all Chinese vessels and aircraft leaving the South China Sea, especially oil tankers. Cancel all visas for Chinese citizens, including university students, going to the US, Canada, Europe and other friendly countries. And more could be done to severely punish China from a distance. Stopping trade with the West would destroy China’s economy. Do the Chinese people really want to return to the way they lived in the 1970’s just to satisfy the ego of their leader? They were poor and isolated back before they improved relations with the global economy. A war with Taiwan would destroy the very prize they seek and cause massive unemployment at home. And a war would do nothing to prepare the country for the serious challenges ahead to deal with very real problems with their water resources.
 
.
I am talking about Ukraine war, it happened becos NATO wants to expand into Ukraine, dont be selective. Believe in what you want to believe.
You start a war because a country wants to join a military alliance?
When will China start war against Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Philippines, Thailand? They are in the US alliance.
Maybe against Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore too? Because they may want to join the US alliance too.
You should seek a doc. Your brain may have a defect.
 
.
A very interesting article on NY Times today. What is a bit shocking to me is that many Recommended comments to the article are saying to leave China alone in case of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan.


A major war in the Indo-Pacific is probably more likely now than at any other time since World War II.

The most probable spark is a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. President Xi Jinping of China has said unifying Taiwan with mainland China “must be achieved.” His Communist Party regime has become sufficiently strong — militarily, economically and industrially — to take Taiwan and directly challenge the United States for regional supremacy.

The United States has vital strategic interests at stake. A successful Chinese invasion of Taiwan would punch a hole in the U.S. and allied chain of defenses in the region, seriously undermining America’s strategic position in the Western Pacific, and would probably cut off U.S. access to world-leading semiconductors and other critical components manufactured in Taiwan. As president, Joe Biden has stated repeatedly that he would defend Taiwan.

But leaders in Washington also need to avoid stumbling carelessly into a war with China because it would be unlike anything ever faced by Americans. U.S. citizens have grown accustomed to sending their military off to fight far from home. But China is a different kind of foe — a military, economic and technological power capable of making a war felt in the American homeland.

As a career strategic analyst and defense planner, including for Australia’s Defense Department, I have spent decades studying how a war could start, how it would play out and the military and nonmilitary operations that China is prepared to conduct. I am convinced that the challenges facing the United States are serious, and its citizens need to become better aware of them.

The military scenario alone is daunting: China would probably launch a lightning air, sea and cyber assault to seize control of key strategic targets on Taiwan within hours, before the United States and its allies could intervene. Taiwan is slightly bigger than the state of Maryland; if you recall how quickly Afghanistan and Kabul fell to the Taliban in 2021, you start to realize that the takeover of Taiwan could happen relatively quickly. China also has more than 1,350 ballistic and cruise missiles poised to strike U.S. and allied forces in Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and American-held territories in the Western Pacific. Then there’s the sheer difficulty the United States would face waging war thousands of miles across the Pacific against an adversary that has the world’s largest navy and Asia’s biggest air force.

Despite this, U.S. military planners would prefer to fight a conventional war. But the Chinese are prepared to wage a much broader type of warfare that would reach deep into American society.

Over the past decade, China has increasingly viewed the United States as mired in political and social crises. Mr. Xi, who likes to say that “the East is rising while the West is declining,” evidently feels that America’s greatest weakness is on its home front. And I believe he is ready to exploit this with a multipronged campaign to divide Americans and undermine and exhaust their will to engage in a prolonged conflict — what China’s military calls enemy disintegration.

Over the past two decades, China has built a formidable cyberwarfare capability designed to penetrate, manipulate and disrupt the United States and allied governments, media organizations, businesses and civil society. If war were to break out, China can be expected to use this to disrupt communications and spread fake news and other disinformation. The aim would be to foster confusion, division and distrust and hinder decision making. China might compound this with electronic and probably some physical attacks on satellites or related infrastructure.



These operations would most likely be accompanied by cyber offensives to disrupt electricity, gas, water, transport, health care and other public services. China has demonstrated its capabilities already, including in Taiwan, where it has waged disinformation campaigns, and in serious hacking incidents in the United States. Mr. Xi has championed such subterfuge as a “magic weapon.”

China could also weaponize its dominance of supply chains and shipping. The impact on Americans would be profound.

The U.S. economy is heavily dependent on Chinese resources and manufactured goods, including many with military applications, and American consumers rely on moderately priced Chinese-made imports for everything from electronics to furniture to shoes. The bulk of these goods is transported aboard ships along sea lanes increasingly controlled by Chinese commercial interests that are ultimately answerable to China’s party-state. A war would halt this trade (as well as American and allied shipments to China).

U.S. supplies of many products could soon run low, paralyzing a vast range of businesses. It could take months to restore trade, and emergency rationing of some items would be needed. Inflation and unemployment would surge, especially in the period in which the economy is repurposed for the war effort, which might include some automobile manufacturers switching to building aircraft or food-processing companies converting to production of priority pharmaceuticals. Stock exchanges in the United States and other countries might temporarily halt trading because of the enormous economic uncertainties.

The United States might be forced to confront the shocking realization that the industrial muscle instrumental in victories like that in World War II — President Franklin Roosevelt’s concept of America as “the arsenal of democracy” — has withered and been surpassed by China.

China is now the dominant global industrial power by many measures. In 2004 U.S. manufacturing output was more than twice China’s; in 2021, China’s output was double that of the United States. China produces more ships, steel and smartphones than any other country and is a world leader in the production of chemicals, metals, heavy industrial equipment and electronics — the basic building blocks of a military-industrial economy.

Critically, the United States is no longer able to outproduce China in advanced weapons and other supplies needed in a war, which the current one in Ukraine has made clear. Provision of military hardware to Kyiv has depleted American stocks of some key military systems. Rebuilding them could take years. Yet the war in Ukraine is relatively small-scale compared with the likely demands of a major war in the Indo-Pacific.

So what needs to be done?

On the military front, the United States should accelerate programs already underway to strengthen and disperse American forces in the Western Pacific to make them less vulnerable to attacks by China. At home, a concerted effort must be made to find ways to better protect U.S. traditional and social media against Chinese disinformation. Supply chains of some critical goods and services need to be reconfigured to shift production to the United States or allied nations, and the United States must pursue a longer-term strategic drive to restore its dominance in global manufacturing.

Building a stronger deterrence by addressing such weaknesses is the best means of averting war. But this will take time. Until then, it is important for Washington to avoid provocations and maintain a civil discourse with Beijing.

The high-altitude balloon that drifted across the United States this month was seen by many Americans as a shocking Chinese breach of U.S. sovereignty. It may turn out to be child’s play compared with the havoc China could wreak on the American homeland in a war.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And while many highly Recommended comments are for avoiding a conflict with China, this one is intriguing.



It would be very difficult to rescue Taiwan from a powerful military located so close to its shores. So the USA and our allies should plan on a different approach. For a start: Cancel all debts owed China from the US and our allies. Confiscate or Blockade all Chinese vessels and aircraft leaving the South China Sea, especially oil tankers. Cancel all visas for Chinese citizens, including university students, going to the US, Canada, Europe and other friendly countries. And more could be done to severely punish China from a distance. Stopping trade with the West would destroy China’s economy. Do the Chinese people really want to return to the way they lived in the 1970’s just to satisfy the ego of their leader? They were poor and isolated back before they improved relations with the global economy. A war with Taiwan would destroy the very prize they seek and cause massive unemployment at home. And a war would do nothing to prepare the country for the serious challenges ahead to deal with very real problems with their water resources.

The comment is from someone who has no understanding of how the world works.

For starters, debts are not cancelled in this way. There is no singular debt. It is an accumulation of many forms of debt between varying parties, existing on different levels. Most of those would have dramatic consequences for simply "cancelling". More consequences than a person telling their mortgage provider that they will no longer be paying any interest or principle on their debt to the bank.

Secondly, the US already lost its Trump era trade war with China. Trade is always a two way street and cancelling visas for Chinese students helps China retain talent and reduce brain drain. It also helps China minimize capital flow from China to the US.

The USA loses by banning Chinese people from entering USA because Chinese migrants who work and pay taxes there, contribute to US industry and technology sectors while taking away from China. If China can actually stop this from happening without major upset to citizens, it would lol. The only downside to sudden stop is excessive unemployment until businesses and startups are given time to begin. Which of course would happen. China would be an economy of 500 million productive people instead of let's say 450 million if the 50 million going overseas and bringing often tens to hundreds of thousands of USD equivalent with them. China gains some if this were to happen. Just short term employment spikes.

Absolutely moronic comment from those you expect such idiocy from. Can only lol at how poorly the average westerner understands the basics of ... literally everything.

As for war proposal. Others have it right in my opinion. This is to avoid unnecessary sanctions and Russia drawing out the war without total win.

China probably prefers Russia to win over this war to drag out. But who knows. Many countries including China, USA, and India have benefited from this war dragging out, in different ways. WRT China and India, mostly economical. But Russia losing has potential instability in Russian politics and future leadership that could present as longer term future problem for China wrt having an unfriendly border if Russia were to collapse and change politically after Putin.
 
Last edited:
.
You start a war because a country wants to join a military alliance?
When will China start war against Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Philippines, Thailand? They are in the US alliance.
Maybe against Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore too? Because they may want to join the US alliance too.
You should seek a doc. Your brain may have a defect.
its you Viets that are sick coming with all these wild and laughable views and claims on the forum.

NATO wants to expand into Ukraine into the heart of Russia, threatening the security of Russia and thats unacceptable to Russia with good reason. No matter how you like to spin it, NATO threatens Russia in the first place and Ukraine is asking for war and thats what it got from Russia.

And dont talk nonsense of the remote countries to China in Asia. As I told you for Vietnam, if you have military alliance with US and let them use bases in Vietnam to threaten China, China will no doubt act resolutely even meaning go to war with your country just as in 1979 war and the Korean war in Korea. If you dont believe, you can try it and see what happens and see who are the fools with brain defects from tropics that cant think logically and need to see doctors.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom