Muammar Gaddafi and his comrades were revolutionaries. Would you also declare Napoleon Bonaparte as an "illegal coupmaker" ? Or Hazrat Muhammad ?
Napoleon certainly grabbed power in a military coup.
So did Gaddafi, and that does not make him snything but a dictator.
And wasn't NATO's regime change plan for Libya and Syria illegal coupmaking ?
NATOs actions in Libya and Syria are legal, since they rely on UNSC resolutions.
Rapist ? This Libyan girl in mid-2011 doesn't think so and she is defiant against Obomba, Sarkozy, Cameron and so on :
One girl can only tell of her own experience.
It does not invalidate witnesses.
A young woman has revealed how she was raped, beaten, abused and even urinated on by Muammar Gaddafi.
www.iol.co.za
You must have gotten you idea from NATO false propaganda. Please read
this article on Pravda for a nice analysis of a crooked NATO book about that subject :
Pravda is not known for ”truth”.
How can you consider NATO-supported Al Qaeda and "Muslim" Brotherhood "his own people" ? Was it that girl in that vid who murdered him ?
NATO does not support Al-Qaeda nor the ”Muslim Brotherhood”. Turkey is a known Muslim Brotherhood supporter, but acts on their own, outside NATO.
Thief ? OTOH King Idris, the man he replaced as the main leader, that one was a thief. Gaddafi used the oil sales to bring comfort, welfare and prosperity to Libyans ( and helped revolutionaries elsewhere like Nelson Mandela ).
He also was the spider in the web for terrorist and ordered several terrorist attacks.
In 2011 there was no homelessness in Libya because decades ago he had vowed that his own parents would live in a tent until all Libyans had a fixed house. This was unlike Western government leaders whose own countries had homelessness but still they attacked Libya where there was none.
You call him a thief but he used the oil sales again to build the biggest water delivery project in the world called
Great Man-Made River project :
That did not stop him from killing anyone opposing his dictatorship, which is the issue.
In doing the above the Libyan system did not have a water tax. You in the West do and I in India do. Water in the Libyan Jamahiriya was considered a human right that should be exchanged in lieu of money.
I am not aware of any water tax, unless you think of VAT which is applied on most merchandise.
There are other examples but Libya was a true democracy unlike countries in the West and those who follow their model. Please read that post I linked you day before yesterday on the topic of democracy. Thiefs are Western governments, stealing people's monies and spending those on building and buying weapons and spending on transnational criminals and propping up criminal governments.
So if there is no compulsory requirement should it mean that those countries that are members should become subordinate to the whims and fancies of NATO governments ?
In Sweden people vote for the parliament, and parliament approves tax levels and budgets. That is how it is supposed to be done, so no stealing going on.
1. Russia opposed the NATO resolutions on Libya and Syria. China did not because China is a selfish society, not Communist. China is not helping Russia in Syria and Ukraine.
If Russia had opposed the resolutions, they would have vetoed them and there would not have been any resolution.
There are no ”NATO” resolutions in the UNSC. Any resolution needs a majority of votes and no veto.
Any of the three permanent members which are also NATO members can stop a resolution. None of them can force the UNSC to adopt a resolution.
2. NATO killed one million North Koreans in the three year Korea War and you call the Libyan forces and Gaddafi as criminals ? We need not remind you of Iraq.
NATO was not participating in the Korean War.
The Korean War was the United Nations fighting the North Koreans and China with support by the Soviet Union.
This was a war started by North Korea.
.
