jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
Well, it is one thing to have you tell a guy "This is a rifle, shoot everything that come thru this door" and to ask a guy to go on complex manoeuvre.Most of the time, soldiers are just doing nothing during war.
Ukrainians already have a lot of territorials which they can't do much with, besides giving then an AK, and telling them "wait for Russians to come"
Soldiers need to be fed, supplied, and trained in use of heavy armaments, know at least basics of tactics, and driven around in some semblance of an armoured vehicle.
A single man with nothing, but small arms can only help holding cities, and only fighting similar very lightly prepared forces.
That's why Russian decision to dilute their best forces with conscripts to draw impressive size numbers spectacularly backfired.
In the military, we have a concept called "Combat Effectiveness" Which mean the actual firepower a unit can spend is directly proportion to how many people in that unit needs their hand hold. Traditionally for every wounded soldier, 2 guys have to pull from combat duty to take care of them, and if you have more wounded then you can handle, then your unit would become combat ineffective.
That's the same as any Territorial Defence Force, for every single guy who hold an AK pointing at a door, there have to be 1 or 2 guys that constantly look over them. Which make the effectiveness decrease. That is why General Mobilisation is very flown upon in any professional military.