What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.
. .
Thats my favorite russian rocket. It was fired at luhansk region and went full boomerang, destroying its own launch system and nearby staff. Awesome.



@Foinikas @jhungary @F-22Raptor @Corax @zartosht @jamahir @Vergennes @Beast

1. My commiserations to the missile crew.

2. Show me The Sun's vids about NATO-created "Syrian" "moderate" "rebels" trying to fire rockets or guns which then explode on themselves. Or show me the The Sun's posted vids of NATO-supported Ukrainian nationalists / Nazis terrorizing Ukrainian civilians or those in Donbas or the journalists and opposition politicians.
 
.
Ok, it’s a defensive posture by us , Like it or not, Russia has plunged NATO and EU nations back into a "Cold War" in Europe. NATO must permanently station combat-ready NATO forces on the eastern border of NATO countries--just as NATO forces faced down the USSR on the inter-German border until the USSR failed. Failure of NATO to act now to prevent Russian expansion will encourage Russia to follow Ukraine with attempts on the Baltic States or other NATO countries.
There are going to be push back from Russia. That is why we can't back down on Ukraine, whatever we are doing is enough (well, not enough as they need more weapon than what we are sending now) but we also need to draw another red line for Russia not to threaten any of us with weapon of mass destruction. We need to have a clear line what we will do if Russia uses any WMD in Ukraine. And that is up to and including imposing a no fly zone over Ukraine IF Russia cross that line. As I said before, lines need to be drawn and of course we are not going to do anything like that if Russia did not cross that line. But we still need to be prepared and react with posture if said line is crossed.

As I said, we cannot afford to be passive and just let Russia threaten us and we step back every time they do. We need to have clear plan as what we will do if Russia start escalating this in Ukraine near NATO border. Because it will be too late if they get inside NATO border.
 
.
There are going to be push back from Russia. That is why we can't back down on Ukraine, whatever we are doing is enough (well, not enough as they need more weapon than what we are sending now) but we also need to draw another red line for Russia not to threaten any of us with weapon of mass destruction. We need to have a clear line what we will do if Russia uses any WMD in Ukraine. And that is up to and including imposing a no fly zone over Ukraine IF Russia cross that line. As I said before, lines need to be drawn and of course we are not going to do anything like that if Russia did not cross that line. But we still need to be prepared and react with posture if said line is crossed.

As I said, we cannot afford to be passive and just let Russia threaten us and we step back every time they do. We need to have clear plan as what we will do if Russia start escalating this in Ukraine near NATO border. Because it will be too late if they get inside NATO border.

Humans haven't evolved one bit since 200,000 years ago. Their little brain only knows "We will not back down. We must have war." This is what Einstein had to say about this.

“I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” – Albert Einstein.
 
.
1. My commiserations to the missile crew.

2. Show me The Sun's vids about NATO-created "Syrian" "moderate" "rebels" trying to fire rockets or guns which then explode on themselves. Or show me the The Sun's posted vids of NATO-supported Ukrainian nationalists / Nazis terrorizing Ukrainian civilians or those in Donbas or the journalists and opposition politicians.

I love how its going full boomerang and killing its own crew. Wonder if they realized whats going on.
 
.
Thats my favorite russian rocket. It was fired at luhansk region and went full boomerang, destroying its own launch system and nearby staff. Awesome.



@Foinikas @jhungary @F-22Raptor @Corax @zartosht @jamahir @Vergennes @Beast
That's either a launch failure or the seeker mistook the launch pad as target (which I doubt because the missile would have to be higher to be able to do that) most likely it failed after launch and head back down to earth and kaboom, took out the launch pad too.
 
.
Thats my favorite russian rocket. It was fired at luhansk region and went full boomerang, destroying its own launch system and nearby staff. Awesome.



@Foinikas @jhungary @F-22Raptor @Corax @zartosht @jamahir @Vergennes @Beast

Multi-billion dollar US anti missile systems come equipped with the exact same features.

Russian systems come at a fraction of a price and are known for being more reliable then overpriced/over engineered western junk that they can only make a handful of because of the insane price




Ukies and Nato are getting bent over every which way on the military/economic/diplomatic realm. Its good you find some tiny nuggets to sooth your immense butthurt

Its gonna get worse for you, buckle up
 
. .
There are going to be push back from Russia. That is why we can't back down on Ukraine, whatever we are doing is enough (well, not enough as they need more weapon than what we are sending now) but we also need to draw another red line for Russia not to threaten any of us with weapon of mass destruction. We need to have a clear line what we will do if Russia uses any WMD in Ukraine. And that is up to and including imposing a no fly zone over Ukraine IF Russia cross that line. As I said before, lines need to be drawn and of course we are not going to do anything like that if Russia did not cross that line. But we still need to be prepared and react with posture if said line is crossed.

As I said, we cannot afford to be passive and just let Russia threaten us and we step back every time they do. We need to have clear plan as what we will do if Russia start escalating this in Ukraine near NATO border. Because it will be too late if they get inside NATO border.


Sweden has conscription, as does Finland. When mobilised, Sweden's Army is larger than the UK's. Finland operates a similar system, and when mobilised, it's Army is an equivalent size to what Russia's was before it began its war with Ukraine. Both countries active service standing Armies are highly professional and, at present, are hugely better equipped than the Russian Army which is almost literally scraping the barrel of its Inventory
 
.
Multi-billion dollar US anti missile systems come equipped with the exact same features.

Russian systems come at a fraction of a price and are known for being more reliable then overpriced/over engineered western junk that they can only make a handful of because of the insane price




Ukies and Nato are getting bent over every which way on the military/economic/diplomatic realm. Its good you find some tiny nuggets to sooth your immense butthurt

Its gonna get worse for you, buckle up

Worse for me? Are you telling me Lufthansa stopped porsche transfer from 1st class terminal to aircraft in Frankfurt?


Dude we live in different worlds.


That said, let us enjoy those self grilled occupiers.
 
.
Sweden has conscription, as does Finland. When mobilised, Sweden's Army is larger than the UK's. Finland operates a similar system, and when mobilised, it's Army is an equivalent size to what Russia's was before it began its war with Ukraine. Both countries active service standing Armies are highly professional and, at present, are hugely better equipped than the Russian Army which is almost literally scraping the barrel of its Inventory

Western men have decayed so much by now they are unwilling to fight Houthis let alone Russians. :rofl: They don't even know what gender they are anymore.

 
.
Sweden has conscription, as does Finland. When mobilised, Sweden's Army is larger than the UK's. Finland operates a similar system, and when mobilised, it's Army is an equivalent size to what Russia's was before it began its war with Ukraine. Both countries active service standing Armies are highly professional and, at present, are hugely better equipped than the Russian Army which is almost literally scraping the barrel of its Inventory
Sweden can mobilise around 200,000 men out of the 9 millions citizens, they don't have the same conscription they used to have, now it's more or less how you fire your weapon and some basic infantry stuff. Swedish does have a large reserve or home guard component, but that take times to mobilise accord to Försvarsmakten, it will take anywhere from 3 months to 1 year to achieve complete mobilisation.

Note : My wife was a major in Swedish Army

Finland have a bigger and deeper defence force, Finland system is pre-2010 Swedish System (well, similar but not the same) where they assigned conscript into reserve unit and put it there for 1/2, 3/4 or full year of service, and those unit retain their training even after demob (training is voluntary tho) Latest figure points to 80% of Finns 30 years or below have been military trained and about half of those are retained for military service, which bump the reserve to 900,000 men. With mobilisation time between 3 to 6 months. Ready reserve + active personnel made the back bone of Finnish Defence Force, numbering around 200,000 with aim to raise that number to 280,000.

In all, both country combine can present 1.5 million fighting force within 1 year.
 
. .
Most of Ukraine artillery is shorter in range thus inferior to Russia artillery, that says a German general. Germany will deliver 6 more howitzer to Ukraine. That will enable Ukraine artillery to target Russia artillery.


83F695AF-B9BF-4A6C-ACF4-6BFD745724C3.jpeg
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom